Question to a psychologist 

Drahomanov Mikhail Petrovich. Drahomanov Mikhail Petrovich Institute of Master's, Postgraduate and Doctoral Studies

Information taken from open sources. If you want to become a page moderator
.

Kyiv Institute of Public Education (KINO)

Previous titles:

Bachelor, Specialist, Master, other

Skill level:

correspondence, external studies, distance learning, evening, daytime

Form of study:

State diploma

Certificate of completion:

From 5000 to 20600 UAH per year

Cost of education:

University characteristics

general information

Until recently, it was believed that the history of our university dates back to July 15, 1920. When the Kiev Institute of Public Education (KINO) was formally formed, it also bore the name of Drahomanov. But historical and pedagogical investigations of the last decade, in-depth study of relevant archival documents and materials, discussions held, scientific conferences and round tables provide grounds for the assertion that the specified date is formal and falsified. It does not take into account the fact that the creation of CINEMA had deeper historical foundations, personified in the organizational and institutional forms of systematic training of secular teachers in Kyiv, begun back in 1834 by the Pedagogical Institute at the Kiev University of St. Vladimir. The latter gave birth to a number of higher Kyiv pedagogical educational institutions, the continuity and continuity of the evolution of which until 1917 was strictly controlled and ensured by the Ministry of Public Education of the Russian Empire.
In 1920, KINO inherited the premises, teaching staff, libraries and traditions of training teachers of the Kyiv University of St. Vladimir, Kyiv Teachers' Institute, Kyiv Higher Women's Courses, Frebel Institute of Preschool Training, etc. . That is, he became the direct successor to the Pedagogical Institute at the University of St. Vladimir, whose successor today is the National Pedagogical University named after M.P. Dragomanova.
The founding date of the NPU is November 21 (December 4, new style) 1834.
Briefly summarized, the history of the development of our university is as follows:

The actual opening at the Kiev University of St. Vladimir of a “special educational institution” - the Pedagogical Institute;

May 1835 Graduation of the first group of external teachers who were certified at the Pedagogical Institute;

1858 Transformation of the Pedagogical Institute into the Higher two-year pedagogical courses at the University of St. Vladimir

1863 Creation on their basis of an independent educational institution - the Kyiv Higher Pedagogical Courses;

1867 Reproduction of the Higher Pedagogical Courses at the University of St. Vladimir, their cooperation with “external” courses;

1909 Transformation of the Kyiv Higher Pedagogical Courses for Men into the Teachers' Institute;

1920 Incorporation of the University of St. Vladimir, Higher Women's Courses (University of St. Olga), Teachers' Institute and other institutions at the Kiev Institute of Public Education named after P. Drahomanov;

1933 Transformation of the KINO named after M.P. Drahomanov to the Kyiv Pedagogical Institute named after A.M. Gorky (since 1936)

1991 Creation on this basis of the Kyiv State Pedagogical University and returning the name of Drahomanov to it;

1997 Granting the University national status.

Restoring the actual history of the formation and development of higher pedagogical education and its leader, the National Pedagogical University named after M.P. Drahomanov is an urgent need for Ukrainian national revival, the establishment of Ukrainian statehood, the authorized entry of domestic education into the European educational space as a deeply historical, fundamental, high-quality, and, accordingly, competitive education.

See all photos

1 of



Areas of study

  • Biology and ecology
  • Geography and geology
  • Story
  • Culture and art, design
  • Light industry
  • Mathematics
  • Food industry and biotechnology
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Psychology and pedagogy
  • Sociology
  • Transport
  • Tourism and hospitality
  • Physics
  • Physical education and sports
  • Philology and foreign languages
  • Philosophy and religion
  • Chemistry
  • Economics, management, marketing
  • Jurisprudence and jurisprudence
  • Other

Faculties and specialties
Institute of Physics and Mathematics

  • physics (computer science and astronomy);
  • mathematics (computer science, administration of educational computer programs);
  • mathematics (economics, computer science);
  • mathematics (physics, computer science);
  • economic theory (computer science).
  • Institute of Humanitarian and Technical Education
  • information technology;
  • design;
  • design and modeling of clothing;
  • road transport and road safety;
  • management;
  • technology of textile and light industry;
  • technology of food industry and public catering.

Institute of Physical Education and Sports

  • football;
  • practical psychology;
  • tourism;
  • fitness;
  • management;
  • security matter.

Institute of Natural Geographical Education and Ecology

  • chemistry (biology, valeology, ecology);
  • biology (social pedagogy, ecology, valeology);
  • biology (practical psychology, ecology, valeology);
  • biology, chemistry, ecology, valeology;
  • geography (biology, ecology, organizer of tourism and local history work);
  • geography (practical psychology, ecology, organizer of tourism and local history work);
  • geography (English, German, French, ecology, organizer of tourism and local history work);
  • ecology and environmental protection;
  • tourism.

Institute of Historical Education

  • jurisprudence;
  • social science;
  • local history tourism;
  • regional studies;
  • Ukrainian studies;
  • examination of cultural and historical values.

Institute of Philosophical Education and Science

  • practical psychology;
  • social science;
  • religious studies (practical psychology);
  • cultural studies (organization and management of cultural excursion activities);
  • pedagogy of higher education.

Institute of Political Science and Law

  • jurisprudence;
  • political science.
  • Institute of Correctional Pedagogy and Psychology
  • correctional psychopedagogy: speech therapy, technology;
  • speech therapy: preschool and school;
  • defectology, typhlopedagogy: preschool and school practical psychology;
  • defectology, typhlopedagogy and speech therapy;
  • Deaf pedagogy: - Ukrainian language and literature; - practical psychology;
  • psychology (special, medical).
  • Institute of Social Work and Management
  • social pedagogy (practical psychology), social and legal protection;
  • management of organizations (social sphere management, personnel management);
  • management of educational institutions;
  • social work (practical psychology);
  • social work;
  • management in social work;
  • management of a social institution.

Institute of Ukrainian Philology and Literary Creativity named after Andrey Malyshko

  • Ukrainian language and literature (foreign literature, Ukrainian studies);
  • Ukrainian language and literature (foreign literature, literary editing);
  • Ukrainian language and literature (foreign literature, practical psychology);
  • Ukrainian language and literature (foreign literature, history);
  • Ukrainian language and literature (foreign literature, English);
  • Ukrainian language and literature (foreign literature, library science);
  • publishing and editing (Ukrainian language and literature, foreign literature).

Institute of Foreign Philology

  • language and literature (English, German or French);
  • language and literature (English, Ukrainian), translation;
  • language and literature (German, English);
  • language and literature (French, English);
  • language and literature (Italian, English);
  • language and literature (Spanish, English);
  • language and literature (Russian, English), translation;
  • language and literature (Russian, Polish), translation;
  • language and literature (foreign literature, English);
  • translation.

Art Institute

  • music pedagogy and education (artistic culture);
  • music pedagogy and education (practical psychology);
  • music pedagogy and education (church choir director);
  • choreography (artistic culture).

Institute of Pedagogy and Psychology

  • primary education (practical psychology);
  • primary education (foreign language);
  • primary education (fine arts, music);
  • primary education (computer science);
  • practical psychology;
  • psychology;
  • fine arts (practical psychology).

Institute of Sociology of Psychology and Social Communications

  • sociology;
  • psychology.

Institute of Management and Economics of Education

  • management.

Institute of Retraining and Advanced Training

  • document management and information activities.

Institute of Child Development

  • preschool education (speech therapy, primary education, practical psychology, foreign language, family education, human health, law);
  • management of sociocultural activities (tourism, editing, cultural and leisure activities).

Admissions Committee Contacts

Admission conditions

To the application submitted in paper form, the applicant adds:

  • a state-issued document on the previously obtained educational (educational and qualification) level on the basis of which admission is carried out, and an appendix to it, originals or copies at your personal choice;
  • certificate(s) of external independent assessment (for applicants on the basis of complete general secondary education) of personal choice, originals or copies;
  • a copy of the document proving identity and citizenship;
  • medical certificate in form 086-y or a copy thereof;
  • six color photographs measuring 3 x 4 cm;
  • 2 envelopes with stamps from Ukraine;
  • folder with drawstrings (right).

Other documents or copies thereof are submitted by the applicant, if this is caused by special conditions of enrollment in the relevant areas (specialties), established by law, within the time limits specified for accepting documents, no later than the deadline for the Admissions Committee to make the first decision on recommending applicants for enrollment.

General pedagogy, history of pedagogy
- Theory and teaching methods (Ukrainian language)
- Theory and teaching methods (Ukrainian literature)
- Theory and teaching methods (foreign literature)
- Theory and teaching methods (mathematics)
- Theory and teaching methods (biology)
- Theory and teaching methods (physics)
- Theory and teaching methods (computer science)
- Theory and teaching methods (music)
- Theory and teaching methods (technical sciences)
- Theory and teaching methods (labor training, drawings)
- Theory and teaching methods (physical education, health fundamentals)
- Theory and methodology of vocational education
- Theory and methods of education
- Learning Theory
- Political culture and ideology
- Theory and history of political science
- Special psychology
- Social pedagogy
- Pedagogical and developmental psychology
- Aesthetics
The following documents are attached to the application:
- Personal personnel record sheet with autobiography, two 3x4 photographs;
- Detailed plan of doctoral dissertation;
- Scientific report (up to 50 pages). On the topic of doctoral dissertation;
- List of published works;
- Reprints of the main scientific works (monograph, textbook, study guide,
articles, brochures, etc.)
- A copy of the candidate of sciences diploma;
- A copy of the associate professor’s certificate;
- Application from the place of work for admission to doctoral studies;
- Characteristics - recommendation from the place of work indicating the protocol number and date
meetings of the Academic Council of the educational institution;
- A copy of the certificate of assignment of an identification number;
- First page of the passport.

Citizens of Ukraine who have a higher education and a specialist or master’s qualification are accepted into graduate school. citizens
other states can be accepted on the basis of agreements concluded with the university.
Applicants take competitive exams in philosophy, one of the foreign languages ​​in the scope of the current program for higher education
institutions, specialties.
Candidates who have passed a mandatory interview with a future academic supervisor and
received a positive assessment of the submitted abstract on the topic of future scientific work.
The following documents are submitted for admission to graduate school:
1 . Application addressed to the rector of the university.
2. Copy of the passport.
3. Personal personnel record sheet, certified by the seal of the place of work or study, three 3x4 photographs.
4 . A copy of a diploma of graduation from a higher educational institution with a copy of the transcript.
5 . Characteristics from the place of work.
6. Abstract on the chosen scientific specialty.
7. List of published scientific works and inventions.
8 . Extract from the minutes of the meeting of the academic council of the university (faculty) for persons directly recommended for graduate school
after graduation.
9 . Certificate of passing candidate exams (if any candidate exams have been passed).
10 . Medical certificate (form two hundred and eighty-six).
eleven . Certificate from the place of work (indicating the official salary), as well as from the place of permanent residence.
12 . A copy of the certificate of assignment of an identification number.
13 . Extract from the work book for persons working.

Drahomanov, Mikhail Petrovich

Historian and publicist. Genus. in 1841 in a Little Russian noble family. He completed a course at Kiev University and was appointed a geography teacher in the Kyiv anthem. and then allowed to lecture on general history. At this time, he published a number of articles in magazines in defense of the local language in public schools, defending its rights not from the point of view of nationalism, but from a pedagogical point of view, as such Great Russian teachers as Ushinsky, Vodovozov and others had done before. Mr. D. received a master's degree and was sent abroad. Here D. gets acquainted with the Galician parties and has a significant influence on the further development of the Galician social movement. Parts 2-5 of his autobiography (“Remember the Galician-Russians”) are devoted to a detailed description of D.’s Galician relations. Since 1876, D., who went abroad, publishes a lot of brochures of literary societies. and political nature in Russian and Little Russian, publishes articles in Italian, French, German, English magazines, speaking out for regional federalism, against the centralism of the Poles (for example, in the book “Historical Poland and Great Russian Democracy”), against the extremes of Ukrainophilism, in defense of the significance of Russian literature, against ethnographic theories in the spirit of Danilevsky and Dukhinsky. The transition to Bulgaria, where D. occupied the department of history (at the Sofia University), coincides with the time of D.’s final break with narrow Ukrainophilism. From a scientific point of view, D.'s activities in folklore are worthy of attention. While still in Russia, D. published a valuable book: “Little Russian Folk Legends and Stories,” and also together with prof. V. B. Antonovich - “Historical songs of the Little Russian people” (1874-75), awarded the Uvarov Prize. In it, D. owns part of the material and all critical explanations. A continuation of this work was published abroad. D. dealt a strong blow to the outdated methods of nationalist ethnography, which tries to determine the national appearance of a people on the basis of local material alone. - D.’s most important works, besides the above: “The Question of the Historical Significance of the Roman Empire and Tacitus” (1869), “The last menstrel of Ukraine” in “Athenaeum” (1873), “Studi etnografici a Kief” (“Rivista Europea”) , "The struggle for spiritual power and freedom of conscience in the 16th and 17th centuries." ("Otech. Zap." 1875, 2-3); "Galician-Russian writing", preface to the publication of stories" by O. Fedkovich (Kyiv, 1876); "Eastern policy of Germany and Russification" ("Vestn. Evr." 1872, 2-5); "Russians in Galicia" ("Vestn. . Heb.", 1873, 1-2); "Literary movement in Galicia" (ib. 9-10); "Jews and Poles in the South-Western Territory" ("Western Evr.", 1875, 7); “New Celtic and Provençal movement in France” (Western Heb., 1875, 7-8); “Literary and social movement in Galicia” (“Delo” 1882, 10); “Literature is Russian, Great Russian, Ukrainian, Galician” (“Pravda”, Lvov, 1873-74); "On the Question of Little Russian Literature" (Vienna, 1876); "La littérature oukrainnienne... rapport présenté au congrès litteraire de Paris" (1878); the same in Italian. (“Riv. Europ.”) and in Galician-Russian (in “Pravda”). D. took an active part in the compilation of the volume of geography of Reclus, which is dedicated to Ukraine. Many of his ethnographic works were published in the Bulgarian “Collection of People’s Spiritualities, Science and Books” (Sofia).

(Brockhaus)

Drahomanov, Mikhail Petrovich (addition to the article)

Historian and publicist; died 1895

(Brockhaus)

Drahomanov, Michael Petrovich

Famous Ukrainian-Russian figure, historian and publicist (1841-1895). In his article “Jews and Poles in the South-Western Region” (Bulletin of Europe, 1875, No. 7; also 1 volume of collected works, 1909), D. spoke out for the need to abolish all legal restrictions in relation to Jews; however, at the same time, not having a sufficiently complete acquaintance with their economic life, D. accused the Jewish population of exploiting Christians, and in connection with this supported the idea that “the unfavorable aspects of the Jewish question will not be eliminated by the emancipation of the Jews.” - Wed: Brock.-Efron; M. Ratner, “Old thoughts on an old question” (“European World”, 1909, V).

(Heb. enc.)

Drahomanov, Mikhail Petrovich

Outstanding Ukrainian scientist and critic. He came from the small landed nobility of the Poltava province. D.'s father lived in St. Petersburg in his youth and collaborated in Russian almanacs of the 20-30s. last century, in his homeland he collected Ukrainian songs and wrote in Ukrainian.

The Ukrainian environment at home, in Gadyach, and in Poltava, where D. studied at the gymnasium, influenced his further development. While still at the gymnasium, under the influence of his teacher Stronin, he became interested in studying history. In 1859, D. entered Kiev University and took an active part in the work of the student circle, which taught in Sunday schools, and after their ban, trained teachers for village schools (the latter were organized by tsarism in Right Bank Ukraine in order to counter Polish revolutionary propaganda, discovered on the eve of the Polish uprising of 1863). So-called The “student community” studied folklore and was interested in literature. D. belonged to the so-called circle. cosmopolitans and explained it this way: “I myself am Ukrainian by origin, and seeing in Kiev quite a few things that the rest of Russia had no idea about, I largely shared the doubts and ideas of the Ukrainian nationalists, and in many ways they seemed reactionary to me: I I could share their indifference to Russian literature, which I now considered more developed than Ukrainian, and more full of pan-European interests (I found much more politically educational in Kolokol and Sovremennik than in Osnova).

However, he subsequently joined Hromada, approaching it on the basis of pedagogical interests: publishing a series of popular books. But already in 1863, the Minister of Internal Affairs Valuev prohibited the printing of Ukrainian popular and pedagogical books due to the fact that “there was no special Little Russian language, there is no and there cannot be.” In the same year, D. graduated from the university, the next year he defended his dissertation “Emperor Tiberius,” and in 1869 he defended his master’s thesis “The Question of the Historical Significance of the Roman Empire and Tacitus.” In 1865 he was elected by the university council as a full-time associate professor. The denunciation (accusation of Ukrainophilism and separatism) deprived D. of his chair and made him a political emigrant.

In his socio-political views, Drahomanov was a prominent representative of the Ukrainian intelligentsia of the 70s. In the area of ​​the national question, he combined the federalist aspirations of the revolutionary-minded representatives of the then Ukrainian intelligentsia with the vague individualistic cosmopolitanism of the democratic trend. Having broken with the Kyiv Ukrainian community on this basis and speaking out against the centralistic tendencies of the then populism, D. eventually became abroad an exponent of liberal constitutional tendencies, the organ of which was the newspaper “Volnoe Slovo”, which D. edited. This organ of Russian constitutionalists, which was actually published with funds from the “Holy Squad” that was in connection with the third branch, did not find any ground and soon ceased. Despite its only one-year existence, D.'s newspaper influenced the subsequent development of liberal constitutional thought. So the liberal magazine "Liberation" in the 900s. stated that he considers D. his predecessor. On Ukrainian soil, D.'s publication anticipated the influence of the Ukrainian Esefs ("socialist-federalists") - a bourgeois party close to the Cadets. The democratic, federalist theory of D. exerted its influence on the Ukrainian intelligentsia for a long time; there were unsuccessful attempts to consider D. even as one of the predecessors of Ukrainian Marxism. Currently, D.'s theory has outlived its usefulness, although certain aspects of it still influence representatives of the petty-bourgeois Ukrainian intelligentsia.

D. pursued his federalist ideas in articles on the cultural and literary development of small nationalities. In the "Bulletin of Europe" (September and October 1874), censorship cut out his article "Essays on the latest literature in the Little Russian dialect." Articles about Galician literature are also devoted to the promotion of federalism. In Galicia and Bukovina D. had, however, only a small circle of his fans (led by Pavlik and Franco). But no one could deny D.’s significance for the development of all Ukrainian literature. “At that time in Galicia, the “Old Russian” direction dominated in literature. Book heavy, artificial speech, far from the living folk language, was completely incomprehensible to the local population, but the Galician intelligentsia was prejudiced towards the folk language, as well as towards the peasant masses in general ". D. fought against this bookishness and imitativeness, trying to bring literature closer to folk, peasant poetry. In a polemic with Grinchenko (Chaichenko), D. rebelled against the provincial narrow-mindedness, nationalistic narrowness and chauvinism of bourgeois Ukrainian literature and wrote: “in vain Chaichenko wants to restore us against the Russians as a people... all peoples - Russians, or Poles, or Ukrainians - have and our bad and our good in nature. The bad comes more from a small education than from the nature of peoples, and therefore we all - Russians, Poles, and Ukrainians - instead of being at enmity, we need to be enlightened and achieve freedom together" (Correspondence with Pavlik, vol. VII, p. 87). D. did not like scholastic bickering about “literary rights”: these rights and their breadth, in his opinion, are determined by the very fact of the existence in a given language of works of real literary value.

In 1879, his main critical and journalistic work, “Shevcheiko, Ukrainophiles and Socialism,” appeared in the fourth collection of the magazine “Hromada” (Geneva edition of D.). The initial point of view of D.’s work is not historical and literary, but journalistic: it was not so much about Shevchenko, but about whether Shevchenko can be considered a socialist and to what extent his works are suitable for promoting socialism among the Ukrainian masses. D. decisively dissociated himself here from Russian populism; As for Marxism, he did not understand it properly, saying for example: "fears" for the fate of the peasantry. In one letter (to Pavlik), D. himself emphasizes: “The article, Shevchenko, Ukrainophiles and socialism,” in addition to an attempt at a historical rather than dogmatic view of Shevchenko, points out the difference between Shevchenko’s love of Ukraine and modern European socialism and at the same time the difference between this socialism from Russian populism (Bakunism, Lavrism, etc.) and Ukrainian. Like European Social Democrats, the author points to the root of socialism in the urban classes, but does not look down on the peasants and points out the possibility and necessity of attracting them to the urban and factory social movement" (Correspondence with Pavlik, vol. VIII, p. 210).

Explaining Shevchenko’s worldview and activities, D. takes into account the poet’s environment.

Shevchenko D. contrasted his class origin and consciousness with his noble circle, the Ukrainophiles, who put the “national cause” in the first place, and not the question of land.

D.'s scientific work stemmed from his interest in folklore during his time at the university. At first he became interested in the origins of religion and the mythology of the Aryan peoples, then from the ancient world he moved to new peoples, to the legends and oral literature of the Slavs, especially the Ukrainians. The result was collections of Ukrainian folk art (two books of fairy tales and two books of songs, published in 1867). In 1869, Drahomanov, together with the historian V.B. Antonovich, began compiling a set of Ukrainian political songs with historical commentary (the first two volumes were published in Kyiv in 1874 and 1875). In Geneva, D. continues to publish historical songs ("New Ukrainian songs about public affairs", 1881 - conscription, abolition of serfdom, proletarianization of the peasantry, peasant labor, farm labor, the life of factory workers).

Known as a folklorist in the scientific circles of Western Europe, D. occupies an honorable place in the history of Ukrainian literary criticism as a propagandist of the theory of the famous German scientist Benfey ( cm.), the founder of the theory of borrowing, which D. supplemented with Lang's theory (ethnological) and sociological explanations of borrowing.

As a representative of the theory of borrowing, D. condemned the theory of Grimm-Buslaev (comparative mythological). D.'s methodology is a combination of two theories: sociological and comparative. Benfey’s influence was especially evident in D.’s work “About the mangy Bunyak” (“Razvidki”, vol. II, p. 155). From the Buslaev school D. took only the principle of the need to study the mutual influences of oral and book poetry: in the so-called. “folk” among the new European nations, D. argued, there is a lot of “bookish” and very few elements of local, national origin, especially in the sphere of prosaic literature: fairy tales, short stories, anecdotes (“Razvidki”, vol. I, p. 192).

Looking for differences and similarities in the treatment of subjects that wander from people to people, D. emphasized the international content of the artistic word in different national forms. This passion for studying influences led Drahomanov to a conclusion completely opposite to the theory of “originality” of Ukrainian “folk art”: “Much of what we now find in our country and even in the sphere of its illiterate population is not a local product and not “folk” "and a cultural product common to all historical peoples" ("Rozvshchki", vol. I, p. 155). It is necessary to compare plot options, find independently developed details that correspond to the everyday characteristics - geographical, social, moral - of the country and era. All kinds of borrowings are handled differently for known social purposes.

D. explores the “embryogenesis” of a work - the process of its growth and distribution. D.'s methodology outlines the path from a specific fact (chronicle message) to resolving the question: whether this fact was the creation of independent creativity based on a historical event, or borrowed from other peoples. D. tries to explain what folk oral creativity and national retellings are. Feeling the insufficiency of the comparative method, he tried to compensate for it with ethnological and sociological analysis.

D.'s socio-political and scientific ideas are closely related. The publicist and the scientist are combined and merged in him. D. was far from the armchair-professorial conceit and was distinguished by the breadth of his views on scientific work. In one letter we read from him (“Correspondence with Ivan Franko and others,” 1885-1887, pp. 210-211): “First of all, I will say that being scientific is a relative matter. Work can have a “newspaper form” and be more scientific than dissertation. Not everything scholastic is scientific, not everything journalistic is unscientific." The tasks of science were for him inseparable from the questions of life.

D.'s big plan was a plan for the history of Ukrainian literature, which he never implemented. It was necessary to start all over again, and this was beyond the power of even such an educated, talented and active person as D. Death interrupted this work almost at the very beginning.

Nevertheless, the significance of D. for Ukrainian literary criticism is undeniable. He trained a galaxy of young scientists led by Franco. Franco's positivism was already preparing the way for Marxist literary criticism, and only Efremov's populist reaction delayed this process.

Bibliography: I. Drapomaniv and V.B. Antonovich, Historical songs of the Little Russian people, Kyiv, vol. I - II, 1874-1875; Little Russian folk legends and stories, Kyiv, 1876; Political songs of the Ukrainian people of the 18th - 19th centuries, Geneva, 1883; Dragomaniv M., Correspondence, vol. I, Lviv, 1901; Correspondence between Yu. Bachinsky and M. Draromanov, 1894-1895, Lviv, 1902; M. I. Kostomarov, Lviv, 1902; Literary-supra parties in Galicia, Lviv, 1904; Correspondence between M. Drahomanov and N. Kobrynskaya, 1883-1895, Lviv, 1905; Correspondence between M. Drahomanov and T. Okunevsky, 1883-1895, Lviv, 1905; M. A. Bakunin, Kazan, 1906; Memories of meeting Turgenev, Kazan, 1906; Drapomaniv M., Listi up to the 1st century. Frank i inshikh, 1881-1886, seen. Iv. Franko, Lviv, 1906; Shevchenko, Ukrainophiles and socialism, Lviv, 1906; Drahomanov M., Autobiography, "The Past", 1906, June; Rozvitsky Mikhail Drahomanov about Ukrainian folk literature and writing, Lviv, vol. I - IV, etc.; Letters from Kavelin and Turgenev to Herzen; Letters from Bakunin to Herzen and Ogarev. Bibliography of political and historical works by D. cm. in general encyclopedias.

P. Franko, Zhittepis Dragomanova, “Life I Word”, 1891, book. 1; Ogonovsky O., prof., History of Russian Literature, vol. IV, Lviv, 1895; Pavlik M., Mikhailo Petrovich Dragomaniv, 1841-1895, His anniversary, death, autobiography and list of works, Lviv, 1896; Franko i b., Sus-pilno-political views of M. Drahomanov, "Literary-scientific bictnik", 1906, book. 8; Pavlik M., M. Dragomaniv and his role in the government of Ukraine, Lviv, 1907; Kistyakovsky B., M. Drahomanov, Political works, vol. I, M., 1908; Franko, Young Ukraine, Lviv, 1910; Krushelnitsky A., About life M. Dragomanova, L., 1912; Lozinsky M., Ukrainian national nutrition in the works of M. Drahomanov, “Dzvin”, Kiev, 1914; Efremov S., Pamyati M.P. Dragomanova, "Ukrainian Life", 1915, book. 7; Dovbishchenko Ya., Mikhailo Drahomanov, view. 1st, Kharkiv, 1917, view. 2nd, 1919; "Our Passage", 1918, book. 2; "In Memory of Mikhail Drahomanov", collection, Kharkiv, 1920; Krymsky A., Mikhail Petrovich Drahomanov, Obituary, "Ethnographic Review", vol. XXVII; Franko, Drawings of Ukrainian-Russian literature; Efremov, History of Ukrainian writing; Biletsky Leonid, Fundamentals of literary and scientific criticism, vol. I.

V. Koryak.

(Lit. enc.)


Large biographical encyclopedia. 2009 .

National Pedagogical University named after Mikhail Drahomanov- a university with more than 180 years of scientific and educational tradition. Throughout its history, it has established itself at a high international level as a European university. Today we cooperate with hundreds of universities in 50 countries.

Until recently, it was believed that the history of our university dates back to July 15, 1920, when the Kiev Institute of Public Education (KINO) was formally formed, also bearing the name of Drahomanov.But historical and pedagogical research of the last decade, an in-depth study of relevant archival documents and materials, discussions held, scientific conferences and round tables give grounds for the assertion that the indicated date is formal and falsified.It does not take into account the fact that the creation of CINEMA had deeper historical foundations, personified in the organizational and institutional forms of systematic training of Soviet teachers in Kyiv, begun back in 1834 by the Pedagogical Institute at the Kiev University of St. Vladimir.The latter gave rise to a number of higher Kyiv pedagogical educational institutions.

In 1920, KINO inherited the premises, teaching staff, libraries and traditions of training teachers of the Kyiv University of St.Vladimir, Kyiv Teachers' Institute, Kyiv Higher Women's Courses, Frebel Institute of Preschool Training and the like.That is, he became the direct successor to the Pedagogical Institute at the University of St.Vladimir, whose heir today National Pedagogical University named after M.P. Dragomanova.

Faculties and specialties

Faculty of Engineering and Pedagogy

  • Secondary education. Labor Training and Technology
  • Professional education. Food technology
  • Professional education. Technology of light industry products
  • Professional education. Computer techologies
  • Professional education. Service sector
  • Professional education. Woodworking
  • Professional education. Design

Faculty of Foreign Philology

  • Secondary education (language and literature (English)
  • Secondary education (language and literature (Italian)
  • Secondary education (language and literature (Russian)
  • Secondary education (language and literature (German)
  • Secondary education (language and literature (French)
  • Secondary education (language and literature (Spanish)
  • Philology. Germanic languages ​​(translation inclusive)
  • Philology. Romance languages ​​(translation inclusive)
  • Philology. Slavic languages ​​(translation inclusive)

Faculty of Computer Science

  • Secondary education. Computer science
  • Software Engineering
  • Computer Science and Information Technology

Faculty of Historical Education

  • Secondary education. Story
  • History and archeology

Faculty of Correctional Pedagogy and Psychology

  • Special education. Oligophrenopedagogy
  • Special education. Speech therapy
  • Special education. Typhlopedagogy
  • Special education. Deaf pedagogy
  • Special education. Orthopedagogy
  • Psychology. Special, clinical

Faculty of Arts

  • Secondary education. Musical art
  • Choreography
  • Musical art

Faculty of Physical Education and Sports

  • Secondary education. Physical Culture
  • physical Culture and sport
  • Physical therapy, occupational therapy

Faculty of Philosophical Education and Science

  • Design
  • Religious Studies
  • Philosophy
  • Cultural studies

Faculty of Pedagogy and Psychology

  • Preschool education
  • Elementary education
  • Secondary education. Human health
  • Fine arts, decorative arts, restoration
  • Psychology. Practical psychology

Faculty of retraining and advanced training

  • Information, library and archival science

Faculty of Political Science and Law

  • Right
  • Political science

Faculty of Natural Geographical Education and Ecology

  • Secondary education. Chemistry
  • Secondary education. Biology
  • Secondary education. Geography
  • Ecology
  • Tourism

Faculty of Social-Psychological Sciences and Management

  • Social work
  • Social Security
  • Sociology
  • Economy
  • Management
  • Management of sociocultural activities

Psychology faculty

  • Psychology

Faculty of Ukrainian Philology and Literary Creativity named after Andrey Malyshko

  • Secondary education. Ukrainian language and literature
  • Philology. Ukrainian language and literature
  • Journalism. Publishing and editing

Faculty of Physics and Mathematics

  • Secondary education. Mathematics
  • Secondary education. Physics
  • Secondary education. Physics and astronomy
  • Physics and astronomy. Physics
  • Physics and astronomy. Astronomy
  • Mathematics

Evening faculty

  • Secondary education. Human health
  • Special education. Speech therapy
  • Philology. Germanic languages ​​(translation inclusive)
  • Philology. Romance languages ​​(translation inclusive)
  • Psychology

For applicants

Member of the Eurasian Association of Universities since 2011

Rector: Andrushchenko Viktor Petrovich


As a special educational institution for training specialists to work in the teaching rank, NPU named after Drahomanov began its history in 1834 as a structural unit of the University of St. Vladimir. Nowadays it is a recognized leader in pedagogical education in Ukraine, widely known and respected in the educational space of Europe and the world.

The university structure includes 20 institutes, 105 departments, 35 educational centers for pre-university training of students and numerous branches abroad and in our state. The university has a full range of pedagogical specialties and trains specialists in one hundred areas at the educational and qualification levels “bachelor”, “specialist” and “master”. The educational process is based on the latest achievements of science, social and pedagogical practice.
The leadership status of the university is ensured by about 1,500 teaching staff, including almost 280 doctors of science, professors, 650 candidates of science, associate professors, 35 academicians of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and industry academies, 65 honored workers of science and technology, 18 people's and 10 honored artists of Ukraine. Honorary doctors and professors of the university are ex-presidents of Ukraine Leonid Kravchuk, Viktor Yushchenko, President of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine B. Paton, President of the Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine V. Kremen, ex-President of Slovakia Rudolf Schuster, poets I. Drach, B. Oleinik, Minister of Education, Science and Culture of Austria Ezhibet Herer, academicians of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine M. Popovich, P. Tronko, Y. Shemshuchenko and others.

Every year, NPU scientists develop about 520-530 scientific topics that are closely related to the problems of higher and secondary education. The structure of the university includes dozens of research centers, laboratories, groups, about 200 scientific circles and 530 problem groups are actively functioning.

Over the 175 years of its existence, the M. Drahomanov National Pedagogical University has become a recognized center of international educational and scientific relations. An extensive system of cooperation has been established with leading educational institutions from more than 50 countries, and cooperation with foreign partners is being actively developed within the framework of more than 80 relevant agreements. Today, foreign students from 26 countries study at the university.

The university is a powerful center for the physical, artistic and aesthetic education of young people. University teams are winners of all-Ukrainian and international Olympiads and tournaments. The university is proud of its song and theater groups: the People's Men's Chapel "Cranes", the People's Choir "Barvinok", the People's Women's Choir "Lybid", the folk song ensemble "Zolotoe Pereveslo", the vocal ensemble "Kupava", the pop-vocal ensemble "Malvy", the "Babylon" theater, the "Most" theater-studio, a ballroom dance studio and others.

Under the leadership of V. Andrushchenko, the Drahomanov NPU has become the largest pedagogical educational institution, which quite naturally confirms its leadership status and continues to increase its intellectual and material capabilities.

© 2007-2019 Eurasian Association of Universities

All rights reserved

publicist, historian, literary scholar, folklorist, economist, philosopher, community activist

Mikhailo Petrovich Drahomanov was born on the 18th spring of 1841 in Gadyachi in Poltava region. The fathers, the nobles, the commanders of the Cossack elders, were sanctified people, and seemed to be liberal for their time. “I needed to ask my father, who developed my intellectual interests, so that I would not have moral discord and struggle...” - Mikhailo Petrovich later thought. From 1849 to 1853, the young man began his studies at the Gadyatsky District School, where, among other disciplines, he studied history, geography, language arts, and was immersed in the ancient world. Having continued his learning, the industrious lad at the Poltava Gymnasium. There were hours of accumulation of knowledge, expansion of the field of interests, accumulation of new political currents. M. Drahomanov defeated the investors with his superordinate directness, practicability, and enlightenment. His sister Olga (the latest letter of Olena Pchilka, mother of Lesya Ukrainka) guessed that “books... Mikhailo, having read in the gymnasium, such power and such authors, that many students of secondary schools in recent times... were delighted bi, feel what's between them the authors were the same... as Shloser, Macaulay, Prescott, Guizo." In the spring of 1859, M. Drahomanov entered the Faculty of History and Philology of Kiev University. Here he has a much wider and greater ability to fully develop his underworld illumination, to become more and more vividly aware of those civil and political processes that have gradually arisen in the troubled student who cares? The University of these times was one of the most important centers of scientific, cultural and community life. A significant contribution was made to the trustee of this deposit, the renowned surgeon M. Pirogov, who “having allowed de facto academic freedom in Kiev, I am going to Europe.” M. Drahomanov tried to understand and organically follow the process of starting with practical huge work, as political sentiments were awakened by the dark situation. We will mark the beginning of the rise of M. Drahomanov as a political and civil activist, becoming his protrusion over the Shevchenko line near Kiev, when the ashes of the great Kobzar were transported to the Chernechoya Mountain. The words spoken by a young promo member: “Everyone who goes to serve the people puts on the crown of thorns,” turned out to be prophetic. In 1863, the family of M. Drahomanov became a member of the Community. This information was considered as a form of awakening the awareness of the national intelligentsia to the knowledge of Ukrainian literature, history, culture, folk customs, and law. Later in the 70s. New, young communities appeared, in the statutes of which there was already provisions about the “independent political establishment” of Ukraine with “elected people’s governments.” Since the mid-60s, M. Drahomanov’s development as a scientist has been closely interconnected with his journalistic activity. In fact, in these works by M. Dragomanov - historical, ethnographic, philological, sociological - there is a shift in emphasis on the political background of the said diet. In 1871, the Kiev University placed M. Drahomanov at the border. Instead of the planned two fates, the young exercises tried at least three there, having seen Berlin, Prague, Viden, Florence, Heidelberg, Lviv in one hour. Galicia has a special place in the political and journalistic activity of M. Drahomanov. He was one of the first who wanted to awaken the Galician huge life, to bring a rave of witness. M. Drahomanov's trip abroad was incredibly rewarding for the young scientist. You can now critically look back and evaluate your reconstruction, presenting them with the final leading European evidence. The onset of reaction, the re-introduction of pressure against the revival of manifestations of Ukrainian culture forced M. Drahomanov to leave the cordon and become a political emigrant. In the spring of 1875, Mikhailo Petrovich, through Galicia and the Ugorshchina, destroyed until the end of the day with the intention of creating the center of a national political thought there, starting the publication of a Ukrainian newspaper. The progressive community-political collection “Community” by M. Drahomanov was created in Geneva in the spring of 1876. Five volumes of the collection were published. The main theme of "Community" is the collection of the most important materials for the development of Ukraine and its people, its spiritual endeavors and aspirations for freedom and equality in the midst of the light. From the other half of the 80s. M. Dragomanova to request a number of wired sights of Galicia before the return. The formation and development of radical movements in Western Ukraine, according to the testimony of I. Frank, became the remaining and, perhaps, greatest joy in Drahomanov’s life. In 1889, Mikhail Petrovich was asked to join the Department of Foreign History, Faculty of History and Philology, Sofia University, Bulgaria. The name of M. Drahomanov was associated in the knowledge of progressive community with the struggle of the Slovenian peoples for freedom, autonomy, and fraternity. A respectful and penetrating politician, M. Drahomanov was tormented by the suffocating, secluded atmosphere that formed on the territory of the Russian Empire among the national minorities. This was the period before the final all-out attack on the freedom-loving mood of the people. “The oppression of the spirit will increase significantly due to awareness of the sad state of justice in Ukraine,” - this is what Lesya Ukrainka said about the remaining days of M.’s life. Dragomanova. The time-consuming enrichment of the camp was accompanied by splashes of creative gifts, but the unforeseen death of a ruptured aorta on June 20, 1895, cut short the life of a great scientist and great figure. Pokhovany M.Dragomanov at Sofia.

The massive activity and creative slaughter of M. Drahomanov secured its special place in the history of political and legal thought not only in Ukraine. He can be called the creator of his own constitutionalist theory, a stickler for enriching government policy and law with the values ​​of secular justice. “Dragomanov was the first of the Russian publicists to give Russian democracy a broad and clear program... the first to brilliantly explain the importance of the constitutional order, especially the rights of individuals and the principles of self-government...” - evaluatively effective there is M. Dragomanova, appointing P. Struve. Emphasizing even more broadly M. Drahomanov’s varied activities for the benefit of I. Franco’s Ukrainian supremacy, they called him a “spiritual father,” “a great critic and bistream, a historically learned mind,” “our greatest journalistic talent.” nation", "a powerful statement" and "a truthful teacher ". The uniqueness of M. Drahomanov as a progressive political and civil activist stands first for everything in his broad, multi-aspect approach to such an important concept as “constitutionalism”, which he often expanded, enriched, Insofar as this is consistent with the concepts of political freedom. Drahoman's understanding of constitutionalism included such principles as political freedom of marriage and individuality, which was realized through popular representation in the center, self-government in the localities, and the extension of human rights and freedoms. Of great significance, looking at the historical perspective and the developments of the current marital-political situation in the world, is the revelation of M. Drahomanov about the initial criterion and the metamorphosis of all different spouses in ednosin: "Basic for the formation of these vodnosins... the responsibility is before the fundamental rights of a person - freedom of thought "and words, gathering and coalitions, tolerance of political and religious people have changed... the beliefs of irreligion." What is important, dialectically and historically grounded was the reconsideration of the ancient, so that despite all these notes “no one in the whole world will be the same...”. Dragomanov clearly described the possibility of hidden revolutionary processes. We believe that any revolution has a political character at its core, changes the political forms of the revolution, but “... cannot create a new way of married life, because this is organic and allows for the growth of front ones, like a tree from this soil , and it is not possible to dictate him with any edicts.” Consistently and firmly in favor of the revolutionary correctness of any development, respecting the revolution with spontaneous and short-term phenomena, although all in the same flamboyant tone of the historical act. As I. Franko accurately and correctly noted, “Dragomanov is an evolutionist, believing in constant organic development not only in the sphere of material phenomena, but also in the sphere of spirit, faith, literature and ethics. evolution, having respected the human - individual, yogo soul, will and intelligence (mind)." The strength of the historical method of M. Drahomanov is that the opinions and publicist minds are organically absorbed into the unity of a specific historical process of the underground, national and universal, individual and community they find We want mutual connection. Concerned with the principles of cultural synthesis of the national and international, Mikhailo Petrovich Drahomanov showed, theoretically grounded, that there is no super-eternity in such a conquest, and promotes this principle through the problems of constitutionalism, political freedom, human rights, national self importance, local self-government, political struggle, presenting the current picture of political Ideas, setting milestones for your next day and creating a comprehensive and comprehensive picture of your day today. “His writings, as well as the example of his life, have given us the lofty view of a undaunted and unbreakable fighter ahead of all for freedom of thought, research, criticism and various human units of peoples, and through them all will be a source of pride and honor for the people, what have you seen like this man,” wrote I. Franko, not fondly telling the Ukrainian people about his worthy. The uniqueness of M. Drahomanov’s article as a scientist is not only, or rather, not so much in the field of political journalism as in the field of political science. He can be considered the founder of national political science, a historian of political science. He himself created the following conclusions about the development of political ideas in the countries of Western Europe, thoroughly examined the theory of absolutism, liberalism, and, having put forward a number of basic progressive positions from decades to directly, giving a concentrated priming of his constitutional and legal doctrine. “All practical human wisdom can be found in teaching directly the spirit of the world, this world, the law and serving as its spirit.