How to deal with kids. Yeti Bigfoot - interesting facts about Bigfoot. Bigfoot History at Michelin Farm

Many people believe in the existence of the Yeti. The question has been raised more than once by scientists, but no direct evidence of the life of such creatures on the planet has been provided by witnesses. The most common opinion is that Bigfoot is a mythical humanoid creature that lives in snowy forests and mountains. But the Yeti myth or reality - no one knows for sure.

Description of Bigfoot

The prehistoric bipedal hominid was named Homo troglodytes by Carl Linnaeus, which means "caveman". Creatures belong to the order of primates. Depending on the habitat, they received different names. So bigfoot or sasquatch is a bigfoot that lives in America, in Asia Homo troglodytes is called a yeti, in India - a barung.

Outwardly, they are something between a huge ape and a man. The creatures look intimidating. Their weight is about 200 kg. They have a large physique with large muscle mass, long arms - up to the knees, massive jaws and a small frontal part. The creature has stocky, muscular legs with short thighs.

The whole body of Bigfoot is covered with a long (palm-sized) and dense hairline, the color of which is white, red, black, brown. The face of the Bigfoot in the lower part protrudes forward and also has hair starting from the eyebrows. The head is conical. The feet are wide, with long movable toes. The growth of the giant is 2-3 m. Yeti footprints are similar to human ones. Usually, eyewitnesses talk about the unpleasant smell that accompanies the Sasquatch.

Norwegian traveler Thor Heyerdahl proposed a classification of bigfoot:

• dwarf yeti, which are found in India, Nepal, Tibet, up to 1 m tall;
• true bigfoot has a height of up to 2 m, thick hairline, long hair on the head;
• giant yeti - 2.5-3 m tall, the traces of a savage are very similar to human ones.

Yeti food

Cryptozoologists involved in the study of species not discovered by science suggest that Bigfoot belongs to primates, and therefore has a diet similar to large monkeys. Yeti eats:

• fresh fruits, vegetables, berries, honey;
• edible herbs, nuts, roots, mushrooms;
• insects, snakes;
• small animals, birds, fish;
• frogs, other amphibians.

It is safe to assume that this creature will not disappear in any habitat and will find something to eat.

Bigfoot Habitat

Everyone can try to catch Bigfoot. To do this, you just need to know what Bigfoot looks like and where it lives. Yeti reports come mainly from mountainous areas or forests. In grottoes and caves, among rocks or in impenetrable thickets, he feels most secure. Travelers claim to have seen Sasquatch or their footprints in certain places.

1. Himalayas. This is Bigfoot's home. Here, for the first time in 1951, a huge footprint, similar to a human, was recorded on camera.
2. The slopes of the Tien Shan mountains. Climbers and rangers of this area do not cease to assert the existence of bigfoot here.
3. Altai mountains. Witnesses recorded Bigfoot approaching human settlements in search of food.
4. Karelian isthmus. The military testified that they saw a yeti with white hair in the mountains. Their data was confirmed by local residents and an expedition organized by the authorities.
5. Northeastern Siberia. Bigfoot traces were found in the course of ongoing research.
6. Texas. According to eyewitnesses, the Yeti lives in the local Sam Houston nature reserve. Those wishing to catch it come here regularly, but so far not a single hunt has been successful.
7. California. Ray Wallace, a resident of San Diego, made a film in 1958 in which he showed a female Sasquatch that lives in the mountains in this area. Later, information surfaced about the falsification of filming, the role of the yeti was played by Wallace's wife, dressed in a fur suit.
8. Tajikistan. In the summer of 1979, a photo of a footprint 34 cm long, discovered in the Hissar mountains, appeared.
9. India. A three-meter tall monster covered with black hair is often encountered here. The locals call him barunga. They managed to get a sample of the animal's fur. It bears a resemblance to a yeti hair obtained by the British climber E. Hillary on the slope of Mount Everest.
10. Also, evidence of the existence of bigfoot in real life was found in Abkhazia, Vancouver, Yamal and in the US state of Oregon.

It is quite difficult to understand whether the existence of Bigfoot is a myth or reality. The chronicles of Tibetan monks contain records of humanoid animals covered with wool seen by temple attendants. Footprints of Bigfoot were first discovered in this region. Sasquatch stories appeared in printed editions for the first time in the 50s of the last century. They were told by climbers who conquered Everest. Immediately there were new adventurers who wanted to see the giant wild people.

Bigfoot family and offspring

The existence of tribes of snow people and children found by hunters, completely covered with wool, is evidenced by the stories of the inhabitants of Tajikistan. A family of wild people - a man, a woman and a child - was seen near Lake Paryen. The locals called them "odes of the ob", i.e. water people. The yeti family approached the water and more than once scared the Tajiks away from their homes. Numerous traces of bigfoot presence were also present here. But due to the dusty sandy soil and the insufficient clarity of the contour, it turned out to be impossible to make a plaster cast. There is no real material evidence of these stories.

The analysis of the DNA of a real female Bigfoot was written by The Times in 2015. It was about the legendary wild woman Zana, who lived in the 19th century in Abkhazia. The story goes that Prince Achba caught and kept her in his cage. She was a tall woman with dark gray skin. Hair covered her entire massive body and face. The cone-shaped head was distinguished by a protruding jaw, a flat nose with raised nostrils. The eyes had a reddish tint. The legs were strong with thin shins, wide feet ended in long flexible fingers.

The legend says that over time the woman's temper subsided and she lived freely in a hole dug with her own hands. She walked around the village, expressed emotions with cries and gestures, did not learn the human language until the end of her life, but responded to her name. She did not use household items and clothes. She is credited with extraordinary strength, speed and agility. Her body retained young features until old age: her hair did not turn gray, her teeth did not fall out, her skin remained elastic and smooth.

Zana had five children from local men. She drowned her firstborn, so the rest of the descendants were taken from the woman immediately after birth. One of Zana's sons remained in the village of Tkhin. He had a daughter, who was interviewed by researchers in search of information. The descendants of Zana did not have signs of a hominid, they only had features of the Negroid race. DNA research has shown that the woman has West African roots. Her children did not have body hair, so there were speculations that the villagers may have embellished the story to attract attention.

Bigfoot by Frank Hansen

At the end of 1968 in Minnesota, in one of the wandering booths, the body of a Bigfoot frozen into a block of ice appeared. Yeti was shown to the audience for the purpose of profit. The owner of an unusual creature resembling a monkey was the famous showman Frank Hansen. A strange exhibit attracted the attention of police and scientists. Zoologists Bernard Euvelmans and Ivan Sanders urgently flew to the city of Rollingstone.

The researchers took photos and sketches of the Yeti for several days. Bigfoot was huge, had large legs and arms, a flattened nose, and brown fur. The big toe was adjacent to the rest, like in humans. The head and arm were pierced by a bullet wound. The owner reacted calmly to the scientists' remarks and claimed that the body had been smuggled out of Kamchatka. The story began to gain more and more popularity among journalists and the public.

The researchers began to insist on defrosting and further study of the corpse. Hansen was offered a huge sum for the right to examine Bigfoot, and then he admitted that the body was an elaborate dummy made at the monster factory in Hollywood.

Later, when the hype subsided, in his memoirs, Hansen again stated the reality of Bigfoot and told how he personally shot him while hunting deer in Wisconsin. Zoologists Bernard Euvelmans and Ivan Sanders continued to insist on the plausibility of the yeti, stating that they smelled decomposition when they examined the creature, so there can be no doubt that it is real.

Photo and video evidence of the existence of Bigfoot

To this day, no material evidence of the existence of bigfoot has been found. Samples of wool, hair, bones, provided by eyewitnesses and owners of private collections, have long been studied.

Their DNA matched the DNA of animals known to science: brown, polar and Himalayan bears, raccoons, cows, horses, deer and other forest dwellers. One of the samples belonged to an ordinary dog.

Skeletons, skins, bones or other remains of Bigfoot have not been found. In one of the Nepalese monasteries, a skull is kept, allegedly belonging to Bigfoot. Laboratory analysis of a hair on the skull indicated morphological features of the DNA of the Himalayan ibex.

Witnesses provided numerous videos and photos of evidence of the existence of Sasquatch, but the quality of the images leaves much to be desired each time. Eyewitnesses attribute the lack of clarity in the images to an inexplicable phenomenon.

The equipment stops working when approaching the Bigfoot. The look of Bigfoot has a hypnotic effect, introducing those present into an unconscious state when it is impossible to control their actions. Yeti also cannot be fixed clearly due to its high speed of movement and overall dimensions. Often fear and poor health prevent people from making a normal video or photo.

Yeti tales debunked

Zoologists are inclined to believe that stories about the existence of Bigfoot are unrealistic. There are no unexplored places and territories left on Earth. The last time scientists discovered a new large animal was over a century ago.

Even the discovery of an unknown species of fungus is now considered a huge event, although there are about 100 thousand of them. Opponents of the version of the existence of the yeti point to a well-known biological fact: for a population to survive, more than a hundred individuals are needed, and such a number cannot be overlooked.

Numerous eyewitness accounts in the mountains and forests can be caused by the following facts:

• oxygen starvation of the brain in high altitude conditions;
• poor visibility in foggy areas, twilight, observer errors;
• intentionally lying to get attention;
• fear, which gives rise to a game of imagination;
• retellings of professional and folk legends and belief in them;
• Yeti footprints found can be left by other animals, for example, the snow leopard puts its paws in one line and its print looks like a huge bare footprint.

Despite the fact that no material evidence of the reality of the yeti, confirmed by genetic examinations, has been found, rumors about mythical creatures do not subside. There are all new evidence, photos, audio and video data that are of dubious quality and may be fake.

DNA testing is ongoing on the provided bone, saliva and hair samples, which always match DNA from other animals. Bigfoot, according to eyewitnesses, is approaching human settlements, expanding the boundaries of its range.

I thought that the story turns out to be unfinished until the details of choosing the next car are described.

And after almost a year, I consider this process finally completed. In the review itself, I touched on this briefly, now the details, thoughts and reasoning.

So here's my "notch" for memory, what to do and what to avoid.

So, after the decision to sell the Yeti, there was no clear understanding of what I would like in return.

Since Skoda suited me perfectly, besides the fact that it had become painfully familiar, naturally the first thoughts were about the new Yeti in a richer configuration. Everything seems to be great: proven, familiar, with the addition of all sorts of convenient options, but the same 152-horse engine, the lack of a mechanical option with all-wheel drive, was embarrassing. And in the end, this familiarity pushed me away. You sit in the salon, and everything is the same .., familiar and familiar ... but the soul asks eeehh.! And therefore, so on, so on.

The second natural consequence was the Tiguan.

Here, of course, my respect! After the Yeti, the older brother, recently updated, is much more solid. It is just as convenient in the cabin, one feels the affinity according to VAG - the same design details that are found here and there do not tire with familiarity, but are a nice reminder of the past. At the same time, there is everything you need: both you have a complete set with all-wheel drive on the mechanics, and a 150 hp engine. with the same torque characteristics as the 1.8 that was on the Yeti, in addition, it has already been modified on a timing belt instead of a chain, in general, what the doctor prescribed to my sick organ of greed, which had been paying unreasonable transport for several years tax for the extra 2 horses.

Everything is great, but... the price, the price... I didn't have enough money. And then my organ of greed began to throw up nitpicks: The rear lights are small and unprofitable (because they are not original) reminiscent of the BMW community, the central locking button is only on the driver's door (in Skoda in the center), the 4WD option on the mechanics is possible only in the "collective farm edition" complete sets with the mocking name Trendline, some kind of appearance against the background of modern trends is very without frills, reminiscent of all combined golf trade winds since the 90s, etc. etc.

Although the inner voice whispered: fool, this is what is cool, elegance in simplicity, classical rigor and harmony of lines, look at this posture, this line of glazing. But, alas, the last "nail" was a contemptuous, through the lip (or so it seemed to me), not a profitable assessment of my Yeti for a trade-in by a manager from VW. In short, pass again.

On this, the natural options ended and the unnatural ones began.

And since the desired cars didn’t suit me, I waved my hand at everything, inscribed “Practicality and economy of the family budget” on my banner, I deduced Renault Duster from many crossovers. But then my beautiful wife, exhausted by me, cried out, demanding some kind of beauty, at least outside or inside (forgive her Duster owners). As a result, the selection criteria staggered, shifted and pointed me to the Hyundai Cretu.

After the Duster toy salon (forgive me, the owners of the Dusters), it was both convenient and almost pleasant to be in Crete. I especially liked the "supervision" instrument panel, I think it's called something like that.

Ride, try on, order a top-end package, make an advance payment and the agonizing wait began. And painful, because there was no satisfaction from the choice, I did not want to savor the future acquisition, enjoy the selection of winter tires and other actions that are usual in such cases.

And I wanted to .. continue to monitor automotive sites, reviews, forums, dealerships, as well as ads for sale in the secondary market.

And I monitored it for myself! White, large, all-wheel drive, on the mechanics. Complete set "comfort" with parking sensors, a rear-view camera, already with a webasto, two years old with a tail, almost in perfect condition - still under warranty - Toyota Rav4. All this, as well as the opportunity to save some money, decided the matter.

But .. without a drive on it, and I sold it for a year. Did not get along. There was no happiness in our union. It is good, roomy, reliable, probably - without any turbines / compressors there - Toyota! But ... it's not comfortable in it, like in the gym.

As I understand now, I fell for the contrast. Opposite to the square verticality of the Skoda, the swift profile of Toyota with side ribs, effectively turning into the aft plumage of the spoiler and taillights, as well as the samurai squint of the front optics line with the radiator grille, bribed with their irresistibility.

It happens in life - a sparkling first impression hides a not always rich essence:

The first noticed unfavorable differences from Skoda were hiding in the pedal assembly. When releasing the clutch pedal, the end of the sole of the shoe clung to something from above. What the..!? Over time, of course, I got used to squeezing it with the very toe, but no, no, yes, you’ll hook it.

Traction 2-liter engine for this car is clearly not enough at low speeds. To maneuver in a parking lot or in a traffic jam with one clutch, unlike the Skoda, you need to be very careful not to turn off the engine, you have to gas it up like a Zhiguli. At the same time, the engine reported readiness to turn sour with an unpleasant vibration resonating through the body, similar at such moments to a barn. But the most decisive disappointment was the behavior of the Rav4 on the track. At Skoda, gears other than sixth outside the city were used extremely rarely or only during acceleration. Toyota, on the other hand, often asked for fifth or even fourth speed on climbs or when overtaking, but without much effect other than the roar of the engine. As a result, there was an understanding that it was not very successful to compensate for the lack of engine power for this car by mechanics. And it is felt that the version of this model with a manual gearbox for Toyota engineers was clearly not a priority. For example, the assistant indicator on the instrument panel does not reflect the current gearshift stage, but only gives recommendations for switching with arrows, and often completely inappropriate.

Further, as it usually happens, the main negative began to acquire smaller ones, such as the inconvenience and oakiness (compared to Skoda) of some buttons in the cabin, the sonorous body in which even the closing of the locks was reflected as a fall of something on the roof, albeit spacious, but some kind of bald trunk in which bags cannot be fixed in any way, with a stupid mesh-stretcher and a roll-up soft shelf, the transverse bars of which, when installed, only hid the space from above, and other "roughness" that, at first impression, does not strike the eye at all or seem to be a matter habits, but which begin to annoy in the course of everyday use.

All this, of course, is trifles and I fully admit that the owners of Rav4 with automatic transmission are satisfied with everything. The car as a whole is not bad, it survived the harsh Siberian winter with me with dignity, but I still had to leave. Its main advantage for me turned out to be that Toyota, firstly, took all sorts of Cretas away from me, and secondly, gave me time to think and accumulate funds to buy a really desired car.

As a result, the heart was calmed down by the acquisition ... Volkswagen Tiguan!

I ordered it from the factory, the desired configuration with the necessary additional packages.

Here I will only say that the Tiguan for me turned out to be the only worthy replacement for the Yeti in terms of convenience, feel and interior equipment, driving performance, and overall impression of the car. There are of course nuances, but more about this in a separate review.

Thanks for reading!

Yeti is the well-known Bigfoot that lives in mountains and forests. On the one hand, it is a mythological creature whose secret is being tried by thousands of scientists around the world. On the other hand, this is a real person who, due to his disgusting appearance, hides away from human eyes.

Today, a new theory has emerged that possibly proves that Bigfoot lives in the Himalayas (mountains of Asia). This is evidenced by strange footprints on the snow cover. Scientists suggest that the Yeti lives below the Himalayan snow line. To find irrefutable evidence, dozens of expeditions to the mountains of China, Nepal and Russia were assembled, but no one could prove the existence of the famous "monster".

Features

Yetis are easy to spot and recognize. If you suddenly travel around the East, then keep this memo for yourself.

"Bigfoot reaches almost 2 meters in height, and its weight varies from 90 to 200 kilograms. Presumably, it all depends on the habitat (respectively, and on food). This is a muscular big man who has thick hair all over his body. Coat color it can be either dark gray or brown. In fact, this is just a general portrait of the famous Yeti, because in different countries it is represented in different ways. "

Bigfoot Story

Yeti is a character of ancient legends and folklore. The Himalayas greet their guests with old stories, where the formidable and dangerous Bigfoot is the key figure. As a rule, such legends are needed not to scare travelers, but to warn against wild animals that can easily harm and even kill. The legends about the famous creature are so old that even Alexander the Great, after conquering the Indus Valley, demanded proof of the existence of the Yeti from the locals, but they only said that Bigfoot lives at high altitude.

What evidence is there

Since the end of the 19th century, scientists have been collecting expeditions to find evidence of the existence of the Yeti. For example, in 1960, Sir Edmund Hillary visited Everest and there he discovered the scalp of an unknown animal. A few years later, research confirmed that it was not a scalp, but a warm helmet made from a Himalayan goat, which, after a long stay in the cold, could appear to be part of Bigfoot's head.

Other evidence:

Russian expedition

In 2011, a conference was held, where both biologists and researchers from all over Russia were present. This event was organized with the support of the Government of the Russian Federation. During the conference, an expedition was assembled, which was supposed to study all the data on Bigfoot and collect irrefutable evidence of its existence.

A few months later, a group of scientists said they had found gray hair in a cave that belonged to a Yeti. However, the scientist Bindernagel proved that all the facts were compromised. This is evidenced by the work of Jeff Meldrum, professor of anatomy and anthropology in Idaho. The scientist said that the twisted tree branches, photographs and collected materials were handicrafts, and the Russian expedition was needed only to attract the attention of tourists from all over the world.

DNA samples

In 2013, geneticist Brian Sykes, who teaches at Oxford, announced to the whole world that he had materials for research, which were teeth, hair and skin. The study examined more than 57 samples, which were carefully compared with the genomes of all animals in the world. The results were not long in coming: most of the material belonged to already known living creatures, such as a horse, a cow, a bear. Even the teeth of a polar-brown bear hybrid that lived over 100,000 years ago have been discovered.

In 2017, a series of studies were conducted, which proved that all the materials belonged to Himalayan and Tibetan bears, as well as a dog.

Theory adherents

Despite the fact that there is still no evidence of the existence of the Yeti, entire communities dedicated to Bigfoot are organized in the world. Their representatives believe that the mysterious creature is simply impossible to catch. This proves that the Yeti is a smart, cunning and educated creature that is carefully hidden from human eyes. The absence of irrefutable facts does not at all mean that such beings do not exist. According to the theory of adherents, Bigfoot prefers a reclusive lifestyle.

Neanderthal mystery

Researcher Myra Sheckley, in her book Bigfoot, described the experience of two hikers. In 1942, two travelers were in the Himalayas, where they saw black spots moving hundreds of meters from their camp. Due to the fact that tourists were located on the ridge, they could clearly distinguish the height, color and habits of unknown creatures.

"The height of the "black spots" reached almost two meters. Their heads were not oval, but square. It was difficult to determine the presence of ears from the silhouette, so perhaps they were not there, or they adjoined too close to the skull. Broad shoulders were covered with a reddish "brown hair that hung down. Despite the fact that the head was covered with hair, the face and chest were completely naked, which made flesh-colored skin visible. The two creatures emitted a loud cry that spread throughout the mountain range."

Scientists are still arguing whether these sightings were real or are an invention of inexperienced tourists. Climber Reinhold Messner concluded that large bears and their tracks were often mistaken for Yetis. He wrote about this in his book My Search for the Yeti: Confronting the Deepest Mystery of the Himalayas.

Does Bigfoot really exist?

In 1986, tourist Anthony Woodridge visited the Himalayas, where he also discovered the Yeti. According to him, the creature was only 150 meters from the traveler, while Bigfoot did not make any sounds and did not move. Anthony Woodridge for a long time tracked down unnaturally huge footprints, which later led him to the creature. Finally, the tourist took two photographs, which he presented to the researchers upon his return. Scientists have long and carefully studied the pictures, and then came to the conclusion that they are genuine and not a fake.

John Napira - anatomist, anthropologist, director of the Smithsonian Institution, primate biologist. He also studied the pictures of Woodridge and said that the tourist is too experienced to confuse the image of the Yeti with a large Tibetan bear. However, more recently, the images were re-examined, and then a team of researchers came to the conclusion that Anthony Woodridge took a photograph of the darkened side of the rock, which stood upright. Despite the indignation of true believers, the pictures were recognized, although real, but did not prove the existence of Bigfoot.

Many secrets keep the expanses of our vast planet. Mysterious creatures hiding from the human world have always aroused genuine interest among scientists and enthusiastic researchers. One of these mysteries was Bigfoot.

Yeti, Bigfoot, Angry, Sasquatch - these are all his names. It is believed that he belongs to the class of mammals, the order of primates, the genus man.

Of course, its existence has not been proven by scientists, however, according to eyewitnesses and many researchers, today we have a complete description of this creature.

What does the legendary cryptid look like?

The most popular image of Bigfoot

His physique is thick and muscular, with thick hair covering the entire surface of the body, with the exception of the palms and feet, which, according to people who met the Yeti, remain completely naked.

The color of the coat can be different depending on the habitat - white, black, gray, red.

The faces are always dark, and the hair on the head is longer than on the rest of the body. According to some reports, the beard and mustache are completely absent, or they are very short and rare.

The skull has a pointed shape and a massive lower jaw.

The growth of these creatures varies from 1.5 to 3 meters. Other witnesses claimed to have met taller individuals.

Features of the Bigfoot body are also long arms and shortened hips.

The Yeti's habitat is a controversial issue, as people claim to have seen it in America, Asia, and even Russia. Presumably, they can be found in the Urals, the Caucasus and Chukotka.

These mysterious creatures live far from civilization, carefully hiding from human attention. Nests can be located in trees or in caves.

But no matter how carefully the snowmen tried to hide, there were local residents who claimed to have seen them.

First eyewitnesses

The first who happened to see the mysterious creature live were Chinese peasants. According to available information, the meeting was not a single one, but numbered about a hundred cases.

After such statements, several countries, including America and Great Britain, sent an expedition in search of traces.

Thanks to the collaboration of two eminent scientists, Richard Greenwell and Gene Poirier, evidence has been found for the existence of the Yeti.

The find was hair that was supposed to belong only to him. However, later, in 1960, Edmund Hillary got the opportunity to examine the scalp again.

His conclusion was unequivocal: the “find” was made of antelope wool.

As expected, many scientists did not agree with this version, finding more and more confirmations of the previously put forward theory.

Bigfoot scalp

In addition to the hairline found, the identity of which is still a controversial issue, there is no other documented evidence.

Except for countless photographs, footprints and eyewitness accounts.

Photos are often of very poor quality, so they do not allow you to reliably determine if these frames are real or fake.

Footprints, which, of course, are similar to human ones, but wider and longer, scientists rank among the traces of famous animals living in the find area.

And even the stories of eyewitnesses who, according to them, met Bigfoot, do not allow us to establish for certain the fact of their existence.

Bigfoot on video

However, in 1967, two men were able to film Bigfoot.

They were R. Patterson and B. Gimlin from Northern California. Being shepherds, one autumn, on the banks of the river, they noticed a creature, which, realizing that it had been found, immediately set off on the run.

Grabbing a camera, Roger Patterson set off to catch up with an unusual creature, which was mistaken for a yeti.

The film aroused genuine interest among scientists who for many years tried to prove or disprove the existence of a mythical creature.

Bob Gimlin and Roger Patterson

A number of features proved that the film was not a fake.

The size of the body and the unusual gait indicated that it was not a person.

The video noted a clear image of the body and limbs of the creature, which ruled out the creation of a special costume for filming the film.

Some structural features of the body allowed scientists to draw conclusions about the similarity of the individual from the video frames with the prehistoric ancestor of man - the Neanderthal ( approx. the last Neanderthals lived about 40 thousand years ago), but very large in size: growth reached 2.5 meters, and weight - 200 kg.

After numerous examinations, the film was found to be authentic.

In 2002, after the death of Ray Wallace, who initiated this filming, his relatives and acquaintances reported that the film was completely staged: a man in a specially tailored suit portrayed an American Yeti, and unusual footprints were left by artificial forms.

But they did not provide evidence that the film was fake. Later, experts conducted an experiment in which a trained person tried to repeat the shots taken in a suit.

They came to the conclusion that at the time the film was made, it was not possible to produce such a quality production.

There were other encounters with the unusual being, most of them in America. For example, in North Carolina, Texas and near the state of Missouri, but unfortunately there is no evidence of these meetings, except for the oral stories of people.

A woman named Zana from Abkhazia

An interesting and unusual confirmation of the existence of these individuals was a woman named Zana, who lived in Abkhazia in the 19th century.

Raisa Khvitovna, Zana's granddaughter - the daughter of Khvit and a Russian woman named Maria

The description of her appearance is similar to the available descriptions of Bigfoot: red hair that covered her dark skin, and the hair on her head was longer than on her whole body.

She did not speak articulately, but uttered only cries and isolated sounds.

The face was large, the cheekbones protruded, and the jaw protruded strongly forward, which gave it a ferocious look.

Zana was able to integrate into human society and even gave birth to several children from local men.

Later, scientists conducted research on the genetic material of Zana's descendants.

According to some sources, their origin originates in West Africa.

The results of the examination indicate the possibility of the existence of a population in Abkhazia during the life of Zana, which means that it is not excluded in other regions.

Makoto Nebuka reveals the secret

One of the enthusiasts who wanted to prove the existence of the Yeti was the Japanese climber Makoto Nebuka.

He hunted Bigfoot for 12 years, exploring the Himalayas.

After so many years of persecution, he came to a disappointing conclusion: the legendary humanoid creature turned out to be just a Himalayan brown bear.

The book with his research describes some interesting facts. It turns out that the word "yeti" is nothing more than a distorted word "meti", which means "bear" in the local dialect.

The Tibetan clans considered the bear to be a supernatural creature that possessed power. Perhaps these concepts were combined, and the myth of Bigfoot spread everywhere.

Research from different countries

Numerous studies have been carried out by many scientists around the world. The USSR was no exception.

Geologists, anthropologists and botanists worked in the commission for the study of Bigfoot. As a result of their work, a theory was put forward that states that Bigfoot is a degraded branch of Neanderthals.

However, then the work of the commission was terminated, and only a few enthusiasts continued to work on research.

Genetic studies of available samples deny the existence of the Yeti. An Oxford University professor, after analyzing the hair, proved that they belonged to a polar bear that existed several thousand years ago.

Still from a film shot in Northern California 10/20/1967

At present, the discussions do not subside.

The question of the existence of another mystery of nature remains open, and the society of cryptozoologists is still trying to find evidence.

All the facts available today do not give one hundred percent certainty in the reality of this creature, although some people really want to believe in it.

Obviously, only a film shot in Northern California can be considered proof of the existence of the object under study.

Some people tend to believe that Bigfoot is of alien origin.

That is why it is so difficult to detect, and all genetic and anthropological analyzes lead scientists to wrong results.

Someone is sure that science is hushing up the fact of their existence and publishes false studies, because there are so many eyewitnesses.

But questions are only multiplying every day, and answers are extremely rare. And although many believe in the existence of Bigfoot, science still denies this fact.

Exactly fifty years ago, two Americans - Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin- made a film that made all supporters of paranormal phenomena tremble with delight. Men videotaped Bigfoot in Blif Creek Gorge in northern California. It was this recording that became the first and only “non-blurry” video evidence of its existence. On it, the creature is not just a spot, but a living organism about six feet tall and with short, thick hair all over its body. The controversy around this tape has not subsided so far. Some argue that bigfoot is real, while others argue that resourceful cameramen also turned out to be excellent directors who shot an ordinary person in a gorilla suit.

AiF.ru spoke with Leading Researcher of the Faculty of Biology of Moscow State University, Doctor of Biology Petr Kamensky and found out why the yeti is fiction.

Population and size

From the point of view of science, it is very difficult to prove that something does not exist, it is much easier to do the opposite. Therefore, I will not swear on blood that there is no Bigfoot. However, I will give facts that will explain why Bigfoot living in California, Tibet, Kuzbass or anywhere else is absurd and unlikely.

Firstly, almost all corners of our planet have already been studied, and there are no places left on Earth where people would not climb in search of large life forms. The last time scientists found and described a large animal was over 100 years ago. Since then, no new species have been discovered. And this suggests that, apparently, this is where all the large individuals unknown to science ended.

For understanding, I’ll give you the following example: this year a grandiose and very important event happened at Moscow State University - people who deal with mushrooms described a new species in the Tver region. It was a real revolution in science, because this territory is well studied, and finding it there was something beyond. And, for a moment, these are mushrooms. They are small. Finding them is much more difficult than finding a huge beast. Namely, such dimensions are attributed by the “eyewitnesses” to the Yeti: it is taller (approximately 220 cm) and much larger than an ordinary person, moreover, it is covered with thick hair. If such a “colossus” existed, it would definitely be noticed! But since there is still no documented evidence of something like this, this only says one thing: Bigfoot does not exist.

In addition, in order for Bigfoot to continue his race, he must not be alone. A whole population is needed, and quite a large one, at least a few dozen individuals, so that the so-called yetis do not degenerate. And if there was such a set of individuals, it would definitely not be missed.

false evidence

Bigfoot is big and cannot hide in such a way that in 200 years people have not discovered it. Meerkats, for example, have also been seen by few, but no one doubts that they exist. And all because they were found, described, made a lot of videos and photographs.

Sometimes there are some "sacred" objects that supposedly belong to Bigfoot: bones, pieces of wool, footprints, etc. All these things, of course, are being studied by scientists. But after genetic analyzes, they turn out to be “dummy”, which refer to already known animals. Often, human DNA is also found in the material, but this only indicates that the samples were contaminated: people held them in their hands and left their “information”.

In general, some funny stories are constantly unfolding around the evidence obtained. For example, if my memory serves me right, once some enthusiast, literally risking his life, stole a "Bigfoot bone" from a Tibetan monastery. He delivered it for research, which showed that it did not belong to a bigfoot at all, but to a real bear, only a large one.

So, if someone ever saw something, then most likely it was the same brown predator that stood on its hind legs. It’s just that someone once imagined it, while others picked up this fantasy and began to believe in it.