Mikhalkov is a Jewish surname. Incomplete speysok disguised Jews. - But for some reason they still showed

The Mikhalkov clan is an excellent illustration of what ideal opportunists are. While Sergei Mikhalkov sang odes to Stalin, his younger brother Mikhail (pictured above) served during the Second World War in the SS, and later in the KGB and with the "hypnotist" Messing.

They started talking about Mikhail Mikhalkov only before his death in 2006. He suddenly, an 80-year old man, began to distribute one interview after another. His autobiographical book in Russian “In the labyrinths of mortal risk” was published in a scanty circulation. Interestingly, this opus was written by him back in the 1950s, but released only abroad - in France, Italy and other countries. No, it was not "samizdat", literature banned in the USSR. On the contrary, the KGB, where Mikhalkov then served, had a hand in the release of the book. An interview with Mikhail Mikhalkov, which contains absolutely fantastic, at first glance, data, was published on the website of the FSB of Russia.

But it would be better if Mikhail Mikhalkov did not distribute these interviews and did not write books. On his example, the fabulousness, the legend of the top of the USSR and even the current Russian Federation are very clearly visible. They are all confused not only in the little things and details of their lives, but also in their own full name and date of birth. We do not know their real parents, native language and other important milestones in their biography. Vladimir Putin, Dmitry Medvedev, Igor Yurgens, Yuri Luzhkov, Sergei Shoigu, Sergei Sobyanin*** (see the footnote at the end of the article for a summary of their biography versions) and so on - we don’t even know anything about them, and what can we say about the second echelon of the Soviet-Russian elite.

Take the same Mikhail Mikhalkov. He is believed to have been born in 1922. But at the same time, his native language was German, and to such an extent native that in the 1930s he could hardly speak Russian in a Soviet school, and he had to learn the language of autokhotons for a year before he was admitted to the general education program. A little later, poor knowledge of Russian will play another cruel joke with him. Then Mikhail said that allegedly in the family they were trained by a German housewife.

Not much is known about Michael's family either. According to one version, he was brought up with his family. More than once he recalled how his older brother was starving and wearing overcoats - and all in order to feed them. Mikhail Mikhalkov also told another version - that in 1930, from the Stavropol Territory, his father sent him to the family of his aunt, Maria Alexandrovna Glebova, who had her five sons. “Leka later became a writer, Sergey was an assistant to Ordzhonikidze, Grisha was Stanislavsky’s assistant, Fedya was an artist, Pyotr was an actor, People’s Artist of the USSR, who talentedly played the role of Grigory Melekhov in the film Quiet Flows the Don. In Pyatigorsk, I was taught at home, so in Moscow I immediately went to the fourth grade, where the students were two years older than me, ”said Mikhail Mikhalkov. In this version, he no longer mentions that he spoke Russian poorly and sat out in an auxiliary class.

Further legends in the life of Michael becomes even more. In 1940, at the age of 18, he managed to finish the NKVD school. Further, the nobleman and the child prodigy are sent to the border - to Izmail. There he met the war.

Mikhail Mikhalkov surrenders to the Germans in the very first days of the war. “Fights… encirclement… fascist camp. Then escape, execution... Camp again, escape again and execution again. As you can see, I survived, ”he briefly characterizes 4 years of his life during the Second World War. In the extended version, the man who was shot twice depicts real miracles. Here it is necessary to quote directly entirely from his book "In the labyrinths of mortal risk."

« After the first escape, I was sheltered by the family of Lucy Zweiss. She straightened out the documents for me in the name of her husband Vladimir Zweis, and I started working as a translator at the labor exchange in Dnepropetrovsk ...

... When he was walking in the direction of Kharkov, he ran into the Germans. He ended up in the headquarters company of the SS Panzer Division "Grossdeutschland". I told its commander, Captain Bersh, an invented legend: supposedly I am a student of the 10th grade, a German by origin from the Caucasus, I was sent for the summer to my grandmother in Brest. When the city was captured by the 101st German division, I got food for their convoy. Bersh believed me and instructed me to supply his unit with provisions. I traveled around the villages, changed German gasoline for food from local residents.

What Mikhial Mikhalkov did in the occupied territories in 1941 is called "Khivi" - an employee of the auxiliary troops of the Wehrmacht. But then Mikhalkov-Zweis begins his career ascent with the Germans.

“SS Panzer Division “Grossdeutschland” retreated to the West to reorganize. On the border of Romania and Hungary, I fled, hoping to find partisans (yeah, right in the countries allies of the Germans in 1942-43 everything was full of partisans - BT). But he never found it (I wonder how Mikhalkov was looking for partisans in Hungary, knocking on houses? - BT). On the other hand, when I got to Budapest, I accidentally met a millionaire from Geneva (I introduced myself to him as the son of the director of a large Berlin concern), who intended to marry his daughter to me. Thanks to him, I visited Switzerland, France, Belgium, Turkey, met with Otto Skorzeny. In the French Resistance, he worked with the residency of the Tsarist General Staff. So I had a chance to fight against fascism in different territories, under different names. But the main goal of all these trips was Latvia - still closer to Russia.

Once I killed a captain from the SS division "Totenkopf", took his uniform and weapons - these uniforms helped me look for a "window" to cross the front. He rode around the enemy units and found out their location. But once they demanded documents from me, which, of course, were not there, I was arrested as a deserter. Until the identity was clarified, they put him in a barn. Ran again until finally managed to cross the front line».

An SS officer rides a horse along the front lines without documents, records the location of German troops. Well, yes…

With a probability of 99%, Mikhail Mikhalkov already in 1942 joined the SS as a punisher. Another version told by him confirms this conclusion. In it, he says that from the German barn he did not cross the front line at all, trying to get into the Red Army, but continued to serve with the Germans.

« But when crossing the front line, I got into the field gendarmerie ... As an SS officer, they didn’t even search me right away. I soon managed to escape. Having unsuccessfully jumped from a five-meter height, he broke his arm, injured his spine ... With difficulty he reached the nearest farm and lost consciousness there. The owner of the farm, a Latvian, took me in a cart to a hospital, of course, German. When I came to my senses, they asked me where my documents were. I replied that they remained in the tunic. In general, not finding the documents, I was issued a card in the name of Captain Muller from Dusseldorf.

I was operated on in the hospital, and from the city of Libava I was evacuated to Koenigsberg with brand new documents of the captain of the SS division "Dead Head". I was provided with cards for three months, issued 1800 marks and ordered a three-month home leave - to recover. Then I had to come to Lissa for the reorganization of the higher SS command staff. There I commanded a tank company».

But SS captain Mikhail Mikhalkov does not get tired of boasting not only about his punitive activities, but also about the fact that he wrote the anthem of his unit.

« When I commanded a tank company in Lisa ... I decided to curry favor and wrote a marching song for the company. At the training ground, the soldiers learned this song and, returning to the unit, sang it under the windows of the headquarters. There were the words, "Where Hitler is, there is victory." The general immediately called me to him: “What is this song?”. I replied that I composed the words and music myself. The general was very pleased».

An excellent family contract turned out for the Mikhalkov clan. One writes the Stalinist anthem of the USSR, the other writes the anthem for the SS division "Dead Head".

« I changed the legend, documents and ended up in Poland, at the Poznan school of military translators. And on February 23, 1945, he went out to his own. By the way, crossing the front line, I buried two pouches with diamonds on the outskirts of Poznan, which I took from two killed Fritz. They're probably still out there somewhere. Now, if I could go there, maybe I would find ...»

Two pouches with diamonds from the Germans walking around the fields ... Then Mikhalkov-Weiss-Muller gets even more inflamed.

(Sergey Mikhalkov and Taiwanchik)

« At first they wanted to shoot immediately. Then they took me to headquarters for interrogation. Obviously, from excitement, I could not speak Russian for two weeks, the colonel interrogated me in German and translated my answers to the general. After long checks, my identity was established - documents came from Moscow confirming that I had graduated from the intelligence school of the NKVD, that I was the brother of the author of the anthem of the Soviet Union, Sergei Mikhalkov. I was sent on a plane to Moscow».

For four years, I completely forgot the Russian language, remembered it for 2 weeks, spoke only German. Either Mikhail Mikhalkov really turned out to be a German Muller, or this is a banal justification for punishment for serving the Germans. Then again several versions of spending time in the "Stalinist dungeons" follow. The first one says that “Mikhalkov” (in order not to get confused in the variants of his surname, we will now write it in quotation marks - after all, later he still had the surnames Sych, Laptev, Sokolov, Schwalbe and about 10 more pieces) were tortured by evil executioners.

« On charges of collaborating with German intelligence, he was repressed and put in a torture chamber in Lefortovo. They tortured me like this - they forced me to sleep on a suspended board so that my head and legs hung from it. Then - the Gulag, a camp in the Far East. My brother Sergei petitioned Beria for my release. Rehabilitated in 1956».

Another version of Mikhalkov's "conclusion" looks like this:

« In the capital, he worked at the Lubyanka. Usually they put me in a prison cell with the captured Nazis (in particular, with the white collaborator generals - Krasnov and Shkuro). I "split" them, exposing spies and Gestapo". In the language of the security forces, this is called a decoy.

There is another version. " He began to print in 1950. For more than twenty years, he acted as a propagandist of the military-patriotic theme, for which he was awarded many certificates of honor and signs of army and navy formations, as well as many diplomas and prizes at All-Union song contests. Published over 400 songs».

Another version says that "Mikhail" "Mikhalkov" began to be printed a little later. " In 1953, after Stalin's death, I was summoned to the KGB and offered to write a book about my military life, believing that it would help instill a sense of patriotism in young people. I wrote an autobiographical story, "In the labyrinths of mortal risk." Konstantin Simonov and Boris Polevoy gave positive reviews. In 1956 I was awarded the Order of Glory. He began to work first in the KGB, then in the Political Administration of the Army and Navy, in the Committee of War Veterans. I give lectures from the propaganda bureau of the Writers' Union on the topic "Intelligence and counterintelligence" in special forces units, intelligence schools, border academies, in the Officers' Houses».

It is worth adding that Mikhalkov is published under the pseudonyms Andronov and Lugovoi (allegedly the first pseudonym came from the name of his nephew, Andron Mikhalkov-Konchalovsky). True, he combines his literary and song activities (claims to have written 400 songs) with the “supervision” of the sorcerer Wolf Messing. " And now my book about Wolf Messing, the famous hypnotist, is being prepared for publication. Why about Messing? Because after the war, I was his curator for ten years, but that's another story…”, - Mikhalkov reports about himself.

Mikhalkov additionally reports about his creative arsenal: “I give lectures: “Intelligence and counterintelligence”, “Hypnosis, telepathy, yoga”, “Marriage, family, love”, and according to Shelton - “On nutrition”.

Whether he is Mikhalkov, Miller or Andronov, we will probably not know soon (and maybe we will never know). As well as information about his brother Sergei (or is he also a resident of German intelligence?) And in general about the Mikhalkov clan. There they all have a legend on a legend. Only one thing is clear: all these people are excellent illustrative material of what ideal opportunists are. For example, it can be assumed that if the Germans had won the Second World War, then “Mikhail Mikhalkov”, as the author of the anthem of the SS division, would have interceded with them for the brother of “Sergey Mikhalkov”, the author of the anthem of the USSR. But the USSR won, and "Sergey" asked for "Mikhail". This type of people does not care who and where to serve - in the SS or the KGB, Hitler, Stalin, Putin or even some Mubarak. If only they would give a place at the power trough. But the worst thing is that such people also teach us how to love the Motherland (the king and the church). Indeed, whether you like it or not, you will remember "the last refuge of the scoundrel."

"Vladimir" "Putin". According to one version, his real name is "Platov", according to another, "Privalov" (under both he passed while serving in the GDR). His real age is also unknown, in any case, when the 2010 Census took place, it turned out that he was three years younger than is commonly believed. KGB friends among themselves still call him "Mikhail Ivanovich".

Igor Yurgens. Before the revolution, his grandfather Theodor Yurgens was the financial director of the Nobel company for oil production in Baku. His brother Albert is an engineer at the Old Believer tanneries of Bogorodsk (now Noginsk), a member of the RSDLP since 1904, it seems that he even participated in the London Party Congress (this is the congress about which it is still unknown at what address it was held in London) . He was killed by counter-revolutionaries.

Maternal grandfather Yakov was a member of the Bund, served 4 years in the tsar's penal servitude.

Igor's father, Yuri, followed in the footsteps of Theodore: first he headed the Azerbaijani trade union of oil workers, then the all-union trade union. Igor followed in the footsteps of his father Yuri: 16 years in the All-Union Central Council of Trade Unions, then from the post of head of the international department of the Council of the All-Union Communist Party of the USSR he was sent to Paris for 5 years - an employee of the secretariat of the UNESCO Department of External Relations.

Who is the father of Nikita Mikhalkov by nationality? and got the best answer

Answer from your neighbor[guru]
the great-grandfather of Nikita and Andrei Mikhalkov, the artist Vasily Surikov, was married to Elizaveta Artlevel Shar, 1858-1888. , the daughter of a French citizen who moved to Russia, Arthur (according to other sources, Auguste) Charet and Countess Maria Alexandrovna de Balmain. The Balmains were a Scottish family who moved to Russia in the 18th century, under Anna Ioannovna.
Maria Alexandrovna's father was Major General Count Alexander Antonovich Balmain (died in 1848), and her mother was Glafira Nikolaevna Svistunova, sister of the Decembrist Pyotr Nikolaevich Svistunov, daughter of real chamberlain Nikolai Petrovich Svistunov (1770-1815) and Maria Alekseevna Rzhevskaya ( 1778-1866). There further goes an extensive pedigree along the line of the Rzhevskys.
The Balmain line is also interesting. Alexander Antonovich de Balmain was the son of General-in-Chief Count Anton Bogdanovich Balmain (1741-1790) from a marriage with a certain Countess Devier, not named by name. However, finding the wife of de Balmain among the Deviers is quite simple. In Petrov's article, dedicated to the Devier family,
Elena Antonovna Devier, daughter of Count Anton Antonovich (died in 1776), who was married (according to Petrov) to a certain Deboli, is indicated. Obviously this was the Comte de Balmain.
Count A. A. Devier was the third son of Peter's associate and the first St. Petersburg police chief Count Anton Manuilovich Devier (1673-1745) and his wife Anna Danilovna Menshikova.
Thus, the Mikhalkov family, already weighed down by an incredible number of noble ancestors and relatives, is still related to Scottish counts, Portuguese Jews, descendants of Smolensk princes and the family of the most illustrious Alexander Danilovich. Vika Razumova
Oracle
(52057)
All who served the false Peter were members of the Masonic lodge, it turns out he still has a Masonic lineage, the purpose of which is to bring the world to its knees before the alien lunar invaders. The moon plays the role of an observation post and among the Masons it is depicted as an eye on American dollars! And since the Zionites became Freemasons, their role of seizing power in the world is very clear...

Answer from KuzYa[guru]
He is Russian, a descendant of the Kindyrevs.

Answer from Elena[newbie]
A stranger among his own among strangers. Everyone says directing. And no, ACTING.

Answer from Elena Mamaeva[guru]
Russian, noble family

Answer from Iodion Raskolnikov[guru]
There is an old Russian tradition, we will not deviate from it - to declare a Jew any at least somewhat outstanding person.
I give Navalny's hand to cut off that if you type "Sergey Mikhalkov is a Jew" in the Yandex search, you will get a bunch of links))

Answer from Alexander Aleshin[guru]
The son of the chamberlain of the court of His Imperial Majesty. Pillar nobleman. And you are all about the same...

It's hard to be God

Nikita MIKHALKOV: “Many of my colleagues are essentially hyenas, jackals who huddle in packs to catch up with and tear apart a big beast. God forbid to be among them alone - these insignificant, small, evil, hysterical people instantly become cowardly deaf when it's scary, but completely unbelt when you can arrange a rut. Demons overcome ... "

Part II

“We Slavs don’t like laws, we can’t stand them”

— You are a deeply religious, Orthodox Christian...

— Yes, although I never finished reading the Bible. Faith is like a soul: either you have it or you don't... Recently I was at the Sergei Bondarchuk military-patriotic film festival in Volokolamsk, and they asked me: "Do you want to make an Orthodox movie?" “What is this? — I was surprised. “To have churches in the frame, monks?” I don’t know how faith helps me, I only know that without it it’s impossible ...

- Tell me, do you not get rejected by the constant flickering on television screens of overly well-fed, inflated priests, many of whom, as it turns out, have the gravest worldly sins? Don't you think that the church has turned into something non-intimate, built on huge money and completely non-church deeds?

- Hmm, do you remember the time when she was intimate in the Soviet Union? It was just that she was not heard of and church hierarchs were not shown on TV. Do you think those years are better? You yourself say what kind of country it was ...

- No, I just think that the church should be separated from the state and deal with its own issues quietly, without too much noise ...

“The point is that it is not easy to return to the state in which the church was before the state began to drown it and roll it into asphalt.

“But do you really like these bronzed hierarchs, shiny with fat?”

“It seems to me that you spotted them somewhere, but I see people whom I either trust or don’t trust, that’s all!” Among the priests, there are enough of those who can be trusted, and those who should not be trusted, and labeling the type of “glossy hierarch”, behind whom there is a huge amount of all sorts of sins, is the very Bolshevism that you oppose. The Russian Orthodox Church in a catacomb form withstood everything that the Soviet government prepared for it, burying priests alive, burning churches and setting up lunatic asylums and colonies there, taking away property and shooting entire parishes. The state will have to pray for this for a long time.

The Orthodox faith gave the Russian man a sense of morality and law, but we Slavs do not like laws, we cannot stand them. Do you know why? It is very boring to live on them, longing! Well, a day, two, well, a month, and then: “Oh, I can’t do this anymore!”. By the way, we are talking about this in the film “The Twelve”. Real democracy in Russia was only in the church (it didn’t exist anywhere else and, I’m afraid, it won’t exist), because before the altar, before the laws, not written by man, but by God, and the emperor, and the schoolboy, and the doctor, and the seller are absolutely equal .

- When perestroika began, you, as a person, apparently moral, were not disgusted by the fact that the former secretaries of the Central Committee and regional committees, and now the presidents and prime ministers of independent countries, went together to churches and began to be baptized there clumsily?

— Well, it is not by chance that they were called candlesticks among the people. As they say, “the heart is still warm with a party card,” but already in the church - so what? This changes my attitude not to faith or to the church, but to a specific figure. Here it’s really an intimate, individual matter: if he goes to the church to be shown on TV, this is one thing, but if he builds a church where he lives in order to renew the parish in this place, this is another. A matter of taste, but the one who has been in the party all his life, and then tore his party card in front of the TV cameras and burned it, disgusts me ... Such people also exist, and successfully, but in general, both of them are immoral.

At the same time, Yeltsin, I think, did a very powerful thing when he put his party card - he just put it, did not burn it. There is sincerity and absolute honesty in this - the same qualities as in the image of the person whom I play in the film "The Twelve". He is a security officer, a military intelligence officer who served the party and the government, fought, did what was prescribed to him by oath. For me, the opportunity to protect someone, realizing that I won’t get anything for it, is an unworthy thing, but when you go at random, not knowing what will happen next, this is mine!

“If Lenin had seen what had been done on his behalf, I think he would have asked himself from the Mausoleum”

- Returning to the kings ... I remember that at one time you advocated the removal of Lenin's body from the Mausoleum: how do you feel about Lenin today, after so many years, during which much could be comprehended, read and learned? Do you still think that keeping a mummy in the Mausoleum and putting it on public display is not human?

- It's just against all Christian rules and Orthodoxy as such: the soul must fly away freely, and the body must be buried. I consider Lenin one of the most tragic and unfortunate figures in the world - just look at his latest photographs, in which he appears as a plant ...

On the television project “Name of Russia”, where our greatest compatriots were determined, Zyuganov, who defended Vladimir Ilyich, cited as a positive example the fact that in a short time, depending on the situation, Lenin changed the program four times: they say, how flexible he was! Excuse me, but it's a disaster when in a huge country a person has to change course four times ...

— ...and rush about. It's the red terror...

- ... now there is a surplus appropriation and a tax in kind, now there is a NEP, and then it’s gone, then the intelligentsia is needed, then there’s no need to send it away ... This is a very tragic thing, and I think, at some moments, awareness of what was done could for him to be worse than any torture.

He was a great man, don't you think?

- Definitely!

And Stalin?

- Certainly. Another conversation, with what sign ... But tell me, is Nero great?

There can't be two opinions...

— You see... Lenin was an incredible reaction and activity of a strategist who really, right now, was making history. Power fell - he picked it up. Someone would itch, hesitate, and he would orient himself instantly. What do the people need? Down with the war! Land for the peasants, factories for the workers! Promised everything! Why did White lose? They couldn't promise what they couldn't give, these people were made of a different fabric...

- Conscience did not allow?

- That's it, and here - hap everything! "Let's go to the world, then we'll figure it out," then: "Surrender your weapons - we will forgive you." When the white officers, accustomed to keeping their word, disarmed and admitted that they had fought with the Reds, they were put into barges and flooded in the Black Sea. Can you imagine who, in this sense, Lenin with his entire gang was? Of course, as a real person, he has nothing to do with the idol that his comrades-in-arms created from him, and if Lenin later saw what was done on his behalf and who came to power, he would just look at everyone in a row: Malenkovs, Khrushchevs, Brezhnev, - I think he himself would have asked from the Mausoleum.

- Why did such people, one better than the other, become tsars in Russia - you didn’t ask this question? Maybe something is wrong with the people?

- Firstly, the people experienced a terrible temptation and are still paying for it. You see, the breed was held in high esteem among horses, dogs, cats...

- ...and among people ...

- ... just about, and in order to take a place on the Mausoleum, you had to prove your own purebred for certain: then you could become the Minister of Defense or Culture. To bet on this was a systemic, vector mistake, and the party anthem proclaimed: "Who was nobody, he will become everything" ...

What a deep meaning!

“Amazing, but only to become everything, being a nobody, there are two ways: either learn from those who were someone, or destroy them ...

The second one is easier...

- Well that's all!

Is this mistake being corrected in today's Russia?

— Of course, a huge step forward has already been made, but this does not mean that everything worked out. All the same, the children of the Komsomol leaders of that time prosper and, by the way, are the basis of corruption ... I have no illusions about this, but on the other hand, evolution is still evident, do you understand? In general, I believe that for Russia, as opposed to an armed revolution, armed evolution is important ...

- Which?

Well, I mean protected. The first revolutionary was Peter I, who decided in one fell swoop to turn a country like Russia into a European one. Some he sent to study in Holland, he explained to others why bitter coffee should be drunk in the morning, and not vodka, he forced others to shave their beards when it was cold ... Then the Table of Ranks appeared, thanks to which they began to respect not the one who sits in the chair, and the chair itself, and the policemen subsequently saluted the "dick carrier", even if watermelons were being carried there, and not a high rank was sitting. This was a very serious distortion, and Voloshin is right when he wrote that Peter the Great was the first Bolshevik. Great person? Yes. And what did he do?!

- As a deeply Russian person, do you know what the Russian national idea should be?

— I don't know, and it's already, so to speak, set the teeth on edge: everyone is looking for a national idea. For me, it consists in continuity, enlightened conservatism and armed, I repeat, evolution ...

“Rudinshtein doesn’t love me, and I don’t really feel sorry for him, but not because he is a Jew, but because he is a swindler”

— Nikita Sergeevich, another uncomfortable question. They say you don't like Jews, is that true?

— (Shakes hands in disbelief). Great question!

- Mark Rudinshtein told me this and several other people ...

Rudinshtein doesn't love me, and I don't really feel sorry for him, but not because he's a Jew, but because he's a swindler. This figure was supposed to give me a cash prize for some of his festivals - I don’t remember which one, and I didn’t give it, but that’s not the point, I’m not ironic enough about him. You know, for me a Russian is anyone who loves and feels my country, who knows it and wants to be with it both in sorrow and in joy. Any! Is Levitan a Jew?

- How to see...

- Yes, just like you ask me about the Jews.

- You cast a glance at the canvases - Russian ...

- Here is the answer to your question. It is foolish to try to prove, as some do, that I have a lot of Jewish friends - this is complete idiocy! For me, there is no such concept at all, as well as the internal rejection inherent in anti-Semites. It exists, and it’s not for nothing that such a saying walks in Russia: “The nose is humpbacked, the Arbat lives, it earns a lot” - this comes from the people. But it’s also stupid to scold Jews for being smarter — it’s better to learn on your own.

You see, destroying a mosque instead of building a temple nearby is ridiculous. I am interested in creation, not the opportunity to take someone's place, and if a person is hired just because he is a Jew, or not hired for the same reason, this is equally stupid and vulgar. Still, if he can fulfill the assigned tasks, work for the business he is engaged in, and for the country, it makes no difference what nationality he is.

The problem is that this is just the most convenient excuse for a certain category of people. For example, you said that many people hate me. Why? Yes, because I, Mikhalkov, allegedly do not like Jews, but there is no evidence. If I hit a boor in the face, and he turned out to be a Jew, this does not mean that I don’t like Jews - I can’t stand boors, and there’s nothing to be done about it. With the same success, I can give both the Kirghiz and the Russian, but some people immediately put a certain base under their hatred: “Ah-ah! Well, okay...". Look at the painting "The Twelve" and you will understand whether I like Jews or not.

- In 1986, Moscow hosted the famous perestroika Fifth Congress of Filmmakers of the USSR, at which terrible scandals erupted. It was a destructive congress, in your opinion?

— Yes, definitely.

- Did he bring a lot of harm to the cinema?

- Very much, and although he is credited with removing disgraced films from the shelves, I think they would have been taken out of there anyway, but we still cannot collect the harmonious system of cinema (I do not mean censorship) destroyed by this congress.

- What was it - a riot of dullness and mediocrity, which finally waited for its time?

– Of course, although the energies of these people succumbed to quite gifted ones, who were simply inexperienced. Now a number of colleagues regret: "That's how it got!".

- They trampled on Sergei Bondarchuk ... Who else?

- Yes, many - they changed the government. Trampling Bondarchuk just because he was a Hero of Socialist Labor, was a member of the Central Committee and he was allowed to shoot big pictures - this is just a riot of mice that were allowed to bite a cat: they say, nothing will happen to them for such courage. Sergei Fedorovich was not ridiculed for the fact that he creates vile films and does not allow others to work, takes money from them ...

- ... but for being successful ...

“I was the only one who stood up for him then.

- Let's go against the current, by the way ...

- Not only that, I was excommunicated from the Union for 15 years, but I consider this time the happiest in my life, because I shot a number of films and received an Oscar, the Grand Prix at Cannes ... I had no idea about the Union - it was they who intrigued and bunched up ...

- Mice?

“They can also be called mice, but in fact they are hyenas, jackals that huddle in packs to catch up with and tear apart a big beast. God forbid to be against them alone - these insignificant, small, evil, hysterical people instantly become cowardly deaf when it's scary, but completely unbelt when you can arrange a rut. Dostoevsky has these lines: “When demons overcome, there is an opportunity - this is a sweet feeling! - to bite a big and strong one who does not even understand why they are biting him. For what?".

This desire of the little one not to rise to the level of the big one, but to drag him off the pedestal so that he becomes a dwarf is a very terrible and cruel force: it is deceitful, noisy ... Look what they write on the Internet about people who are above: how can they so insult? I remember one man finished his beer at the stadium and threw the bottle down with a swing. From there: "Ay!", There is already someone in the blood, and he made such a face, as if it had nothing to do with it ... This elevation on an abomination is scary, and it is very difficult to resist not to challenge him. There was no heroism in my speech in defense of Bondarchuk, but I am happy that the Lord allowed me to do this intuitively.

“If you play, then a characteristic idiot in a raspberry jacket with the same dunce son”

- There are, Nikita Sergeevich, two categories of films: some are loved by the people, while others are admired by aesthetes. Tell me, how do you feel about Tarkovsky's films and what do you think of this director?

- It is difficult for me to evaluate it abstractly - we were close. He lived at our house, grew up, matured, was friends with my brother - everything happened before my eyes! I ran to them for vodka, stood on the atas and did everything, so I recognized Tarkovsky (both his name and himself) even before he made his first film, Ivan's Childhood.

Of course, I consider him a great director, but, you see, many people later decided that if you shoot long enough, it will turn out like Tarkovsky's. Alas: it just comes out long and boring - after all, he has energy. You can love some of his films more, some less, but, say, "The Mirror" and "Andrey Rublev" are a golden fund ... "Rublev" in general is a great picture!

- Curious, what kind of actors do you prefer when you make a director's choice? What do you pay attention to first of all?

- All this is very individual - it is unambiguously impossible to answer. Sometimes an actor is needed for half a minute, sometimes only his face is needed ...

- Will you take a drunkard into the group?

- If I understand that at the time when it is needed, I will not have to take it out of the sobering-up station, I will take it, but in general - no.

- Will you accept the wicked? Suppose a person is vile, nasty, antipathetic to you personally to the core, but the type ...

- I'll accept it! We may not communicate, but what I need, he will do.

- Oleg Menshikov played brilliantly in several of your films. How do you feel about his roles in such, in my opinion, failed films as "Doctor Zhivago" and especially "The Golden Calf" by Ulyana Shilkina - have you seen these works?

- Oleg needs a director - that's the point. Menshikov is incredibly gifted: in his weight and age category, in his image and role, he is one of the largest actors, at least in Europe, however ... Oleg can only be a creator in his element - in the theater, but in the cinema he is a performer and without the one who directs it, it is lost.

- Once again, I admired your talent when I watched Balabanov's film "Blind Man's Buff". Was it not afraid to take on the role of godfather Mikhalych, were you not afraid that after that the fans would perceive you differently?

- And I wanted this: stereotypes must be broken! Once, going through the Mosfilm card index as necessary, I came across a card of one actor who played Lenin, and it was written on it: “Do not shoot in negative roles.” See, it's over for him...

A stereotype for an actor is a very dangerous thing, especially when he understands that it is profitable to play what he is loved for and what makes him popular. Naturally, after that he is afraid to retreat from the stamp, which brings both success and money ...

- In the role of godfather were you organic?

- At first, when Alexei Balabanov and I were just talking, he offered me a different drawing - he saw the mafia as terribly serious. I said that I was completely uninterested: if you play, then a characteristic idiot in a raspberry jacket with the same dunce son. It's like a banter over a banter, a tape in the style of Tarantino, only today and about our time. In general, I think that Balabanov, having removed "Brother" and "Brother-2", "Zhmurkami" closed the topic, and I was curious to take part in this.

- Did you add a lot of yourself there?

- Enough - I offered him the whole character with all its facets. “If such a person suits you,” he said, “I will play him, and if the task is different, it’s boring for me to portray superman mafia: there are a lot of artists who can do it perfectly” ...

- Did you like his painting "Cargo-200"?

Unfortunately, I didn't see her. On the disc, Alexey asked not to watch, but I didn’t get to the cinema - I didn’t have time, because I filmed it myself ... So she passed by. I'll take a look, but I don't know when yet.

- Now you are finishing "Burnt by the Sun-2" - why is Ingeborga Dapkunaite not being filmed there?

- Not removed for a reason ... (Pause). Unfortunately, she did not escape the temptation and began to take part in the program, in my opinion, “Big Brother” is some kind of reality show like “House-2”, but I think that such things are incompatible with cinema. I understand that they probably pay a lot of money there, that there is a need, and so on, but this causes such enormous damage to the profession, which is not at all easy to get rid of.

“Work and friends were more important to me than women”

- I heard that you are going to make a film "Once Upon a Time in Russia" - a kind of encyclopedia of modern Russian life like "Once Upon a Time in America" ​​...

- Well, such thoughts really exist.

- And what will this tape be?

- I do not know yet. There are only a few scattered sensations, but, in principle, this is The Godfather, though not so much bang-bang as an internal psychological drama. Timelessness...

- I can imagine (or rather, I can’t even imagine) how you were loved (and loved!) by women - did you suffer from this or did you like their ardent adoration?

- I somehow never really thought about this, although, of course, relationships with a woman are a huge impulse. They energize, inject absolutely necessary adrenaline into the blood, but I never put it at the forefront - work and friends were more important to me than women.

“Excuse me, is this not coquetry?”

- Dmitry, I promised to answer sincerely! Can you imagine what I could do in life if the main thing for me was success with women? By the way, the more you try to turn their heads, the less chance you have, because it is absolutely pointless to try to get through to a woman if there is no current between you from the very beginning. In general, the relationship of the stronger and the weaker sex is a mysterious thing. How many times have there been situations when the three of us are sitting, talking wonderfully, and then the fourth one comes. He didn't do any of that, but wow! - and that's all: a foreign energy entered and destroyed the cordiality of the atmosphere.

Like it or not... It happens at such a distance and at such a subtle level that you can hardly understand if something is possible. It is very important to pause here, and if at the same second you start, as they say, to beat with a hoof, half of the women will think: “Aaah, it looks like the others” and leave.

- Admit it, have you ever taken away a lady of the heart from someone, or, perhaps, taken away from you?

- It happened to me, but did I take it away? (Pause). I don't know... I never violated what had already somehow happened, but sometimes some women who were with someone later ended up with me.

- Your first wife was Anastasia Vertinskaya - not only a very beautiful, but also an insanely talented actress. Is it true that you beat her fans?

- Well (smiles) I actually fought a lot.

- The nature of such a groovy or reasons were?

- Well, I told you, when we discussed the Jewish question, that I hit in the face, and not according to nationality.

- Did the Kirghiz come across a hot hand?

- And the Jews, too, and the Russians - here is a complete international. I had to use my fists - that's how the circumstances developed. I can't say I've always been right—God forbid! - but this is also adrenaline: there is always something cock-like in men.

- Surely, around your beautiful wife, who was also actively filming, playing at the Moscow Art Theater, there were many males who wanted to take her away from you. Among those whom you gave in the face, were there famous personalities?

- Well, no ... You see, when I was already married, at a level where people are quite famous and visible, the rules of decency were respected, but it was impossible without stupid restaurant harassment ...

His children from his second marriage - Nadia, Artem and Anna - dad actively shoots in his own movie

- Were you jealous of her?

- I think the feeling was mixed, because I was jealous, if it can be called jealousy, not so much for specific rivals, but for the profession. It is quite difficult for a man to experience the success of his wife.

- Even a successful man?

- The fact is that at that time I was still far from success. When we met, I was just starring in "I'm walking around Moscow", and Nastya already had the main roles in "Scarlet Sails", in "Hamlet" ... Of course, she was much more popular, and this interfered, annoyed, caused very unfair feeling.

Are you talking to her now?

- Well, how could it be otherwise - our grandchildren are growing up ...

- And what - normally bowing, kissing, discussing something?

- Completely calm.

- Is everything quiet?

- After so many years, making any claims is stupid, pointless. Moreover, there is a son, grandchildren, granddaughter ...

- By the time you married the fashion model of the Moscow House of Models Tatyana Solovieva, did you already have a clear idea of ​​\u200b\u200bwhat kind of woman you need both in form and in content?

— Yes, absolutely.

- And she fully corresponded to your ideal?

- I would not say this, but Tatyana was so different from those around her that she was interesting to me.

"Sensuality is not about unhooking your bra or getting into your pants, but about managing the energy that affects the viewer"

- Evil tongues say that you recently had a gap, and a very serious one ...

- Well no (laughs), it is not true.

“I’ll risk asking you another unpleasant question and I hope you don’t get into a fight because of it. On the Internet, I recently read a vile rumor about you: supposedly the sex symbol of the Soviet Union and Russia, Nikita Mikhalkov, adheres to non-traditional sexual orientation. What do you say to that?

- You know, I realized that being known as such is incredibly beneficial, at least when sorting out relationships with women, there is an opportunity to say: "Read the Internet."

From a newsmaker point of view, it’s a sin for me to complain: 40 years old, even more (in the 63rd, when I was filming I’m walking around Moscow, I was 18, which means 45 years old), I’m in plain sight ...

- ...and in what way!

“Besides, if gossip is spread about a person, it’s good. As the screenwriter of Fellini's film 8 1/2 famously said: "Speak badly, speak well, but speak about me." Of course, this causes bewilderment, laughter, sometimes you even want to give a forehead ...

“If only I could find the Kyrgyz who started this rumor...

Yes, but, on the other hand, if it arouses interest, excites people, makes them talk about you, then you excite consciousness with your existence, work and thoughts. It doesn’t matter if it’s true or false: in fact, many spread rumors on purpose, if only they were talked about, but in order to manage to endure 45 years, you have to be a brilliant PR man, and I don’t do anything for this, I just live by God’s grace. I act as I see fit, I speak, write and shoot what I find necessary, that is, I behave in accordance with my idea of ​​​​life and my answer, so to speak, before God. Good, bad, wrong, but I live, and it's wonderful that it causes such a reaction, and as for the "blue" hearing ... Do you think I look like that?

- That's the thing, no...

“You see, as Chekhov said, “A man is what he believes in.”

- Actresses, the most outstanding, talented and beautiful, admitted to me that without an affair during filming with the director, it is often just not possible. Have you had many romances with actresses?

“You know, this is a very dangerous thing.

- How?

— The fact is that the work on the film should take place in a state of internal, so to speak, vibration...

- ...How is that?..

- ... when a feeling of need, astringency, this musk exists between a man and a woman, but you can’t satisfy it, because then what was born will not go into a profession, into business, but will pour out, roughly speaking, in bed. It's impossible to work with an actor, I don't even talk to an actress, if you don't like this person...

- And the technique does not save?

Well, depending on the situation. If it is, for example, an old money-lender...

— No, if love is to be played...

- If there is a woman who has to portray love with a partner, another actor, you still have to give her male energy, nourishing her in the frame, because usually what an actor does is not enough.

- And what, it turned out to give her this energy without a bed, without sex?

- The most important thing is that without it.

- Have you ever had anything with actresses?

— No, and here I am absolutely firm. I could have everything in this sense, and yet I am very glad that (clicks tongue)... Of course, this offended someone ...

- Before her death, the late Nonna Viktorovna Mordyukova told me that this musk came to you on the set of Rodney - could something happen between you there too or is it excluded?

- Could probably...

“…despite the age difference?”

— Absolutely. Nonna was beyond her age - a real woman ...

— ...and theoretically?..

- Well, how can I tell you? It, this feeling, should have been, I still have to initiate it ...

- Well, well, but when the actresses themselves took the initiative (I’m sure it happened!), Did you really say: “No, not that!” - and ran away in confusion?

- You see, a woman should be led, and if it happens the other way around - that's it, the end.

- Nevertheless, there are different characters, temperaments ...

- Men in a skirt are not interesting to me (I'm talking about myself, not about everyone), and if a man uses a woman, that is, if possession of her is important to him, their relationship is a perishable product. I am absolutely convinced: you can only be high with a woman if she feels good first.

— In my opinion, this is an axiom!

- I agree, but, unfortunately, we very often theorize correctly and act incorrectly. The fact is that a woman who tries to change places with a man: from a follower to become a leader, instantly loses her energy for me.

It’s just this movement that interests me, the pulsation, and not the final result, the question is more interesting to me than the answer, so all my energy is directed to where the erotic sensation has nothing to do with palpation, touch. Sensuality can manifest itself at a distance of 200 meters and a thousand kilometers, in a telephone conversation, but it is important to understand that this requires a coincidence of amplitudes that you must be able to manage: more-less, higher-lower, and as a result - a surge of energy, temperature! Actually, this is directing, working with an actor, and maybe partly for this reason there are various rumors about me.

Do you know how wonderful Olbrychsky said? "In fact, I'm a pederast - I just don't like technology." How to decipher it? The relationship between the actors, between the actor and the director, is in one way or another sensual in nature, and this sensuality is not in flaring nostrils, not in grabbing hands, not in unbuttoning your bra or getting into your pants, but in controlling the energy that affects the viewer, because that the end result is that which, having originated here, will be transmitted there. If it does not arise, you can cut it as you like with the installation - it's still dead.

- From all of the above, I understood, Nikita Sergeevich, that you did not have novels with actresses, but your brother survived them both for himself and for you. How do you feel about his books "Low Truths" and "Uplifting Deception", where he extremely frankly exposed his relationship with famous and very famous ladies?

Well, that's his business...

Have you read Andron's books?

- Certainly.

- Liked?

- It was interesting, another thing is that it devastates. Dostoevsky said: "Man is a mystery," and the point is not to hide or hide something, it's just that our inner life is much more interesting, larger and higher than the outer one - this is exactly what a person lives by. It is she who is his breeding ground, and not parties, parties, dinners, outfits.

- Brother asked your opinion about his frank works, was there a discussion?

He asked: "Did you read it?" “Yes,” I replied. "And How?". - "Very interesting". That, in fact, is all ... We try not to injure each other, we have our own points of view on all occasions, and sometimes they coincide, and sometimes not.

“There was a cult of the older brother in the family: he beat me, I put up with it”

- Vasily Lanovoy told me: "After reading this abomination, Mikhalkov-Konchalovsky became unshakable for me" ...

- That's his right. Lanovoy's wife is also hurt there...

- ... Irina Kupchenko ...

- Quite right, and in this case I can not condemn either one or the other. There are things of taste... Books are, as it were, Andron's confession, but they have one essential difference...

- ...they hurt others ...

— This is not the point, but the fact that, after all, confession does not imply publicity. You confess to the Lord through a priest, he tells you what he thinks about this, and you must draw some conclusions for yourself, and when you, so to speak, are naked in front of the rest of the world, you must be ready for anything.

Is your brother a talented person?

- Undoubtedly.

What do you think of his directing work?

Some like it more, some less.

Is it true that you have a difficult relationship between two powerful artists?

- You know, many would like it to be so, but no, it is out of the question. I have always revered him, and in the family the cult of the elder brother was initially very developed. I remember he beat me, I put up with it... Until a certain moment, I listened very carefully to what Andron was saying, showed him my films when they were already edited and nothing could be changed.

But why did they show it anyway?

- Of course, and I had a double feeling when he told me that here it would be necessary to do like this, and there like that. Often I realized that his version was better, but I was happy that it was no longer possible to remake the picture: these were my mistakes, and I myself learned from them.

I am also grateful to him for the fact that he never tried to make his clone of me, that is, each of us went his own way. In this sense, although we agree in many respects, we represent completely different trends in cinema and in art: it is dominated by a pragmatist, a Western view of the world, and I, as he himself believes, is more romantic ... All this does not interfere us to be brothers: we, in fact, balance each other to some extent.

- You have four very talented children, whom you periodically use in your films. Is it hard for a father to take off his children?

- The thing is that when they are on the site, I don’t treat them like children.

- How about the actors?

- Only, moreover, often much tougher than the rest. If you, God willing, see "Burnt by the Sun-2", you will understand what Nadia had to experience there. It’s not easy: in 28-degree frost, to be at the training ground among the conflagration and barbed wire, and three wind blowers directed at you, depicting a blizzard, are thrown not with snow, which flies by quickly enough, but with cement, and they need to breathe and at the same time drag them in turn with two wounded. On the fourth take, she couldn't just move any of them, and this is not ostentatious cruelty, but necessity. Then I read an interview in the Orthodox magazine "Foma" where Nadya said that through these breaths, through the terrible physical work, she felt and understood the meaning of the picture.

- Children consult with you in difficult life situations, come to talk one on one, trust some secrets?

- When it gets hot - yes, but our relationship is built in such a way that they try to solve their problems themselves to the end. When it doesn't work out, they come to me, and I think it's right. Sometimes, seeing that they can still flounder, I suggest that they try to swim out on their own - if after that something still fails, I turn my shoulder.

“Sometimes you look: “Oh my, did I really take it off? Well done!"

- In the films "Station for Two" and "Cruel Romance" you played two amazing male types - well, very masculine ... Tell me, Paratov from "Cruel Romance" is close to you in spirit, in feeling?

— Yes, of course.

Did they play themselves?

- Well, in any role, even in "Blind Man's Bluff", I remain myself to some extent ... It is impossible to do without this: one way or another, everything must be passed through oneself. Yes, Paratov is largely a predator. Well, I'm a predator...

- You were often asked to sing about the hairy bumblebee after this film ...

- Constantly.

- You didn't refuse?

- Sometimes I sing, sometimes I don't ... I remember that at some corporate party in St. Petersburg there was a funny lady. Everything was with her: her chest, the Suzuki, but she was completely oblique - the halla to the side, the glasses to the side ... She walked up to our table on breaking heels, looked around at everyone, not recognizing anyone, and said: “And you were told that the artist Mikhalkov now will we sing a song about bees? From that moment on, the company went like this: a song about bees, but, in principle, I try (maybe this is wrong) not to use once open all the time. Let's say I can tell you everything about the picture while I'm inventing it, while we're writing the script, while I'm filming and editing it...

- What are you - clearly represent all the episodes?

- Of course, I see everything and remember every frame shot - even in such a space as "Burnt by the Sun-2" (and this is about 275 hours of material) ... The editors were surprised when, seeing the next episode, I told them: " I definitely shot such and such a shot, ”and they found it. Well, how could one miss it, if one logically follows from the other?

When the picture is finished, it came out on the screens and time has passed, it flies off me like a stage of a rocket, I completely forget it. Sometimes you look: “Oh my, did I really take this off? Well done!". I don’t have a load of used material behind me, and, by the way, I think this is a paternal quality: he is absolutely frivolous about his poems.

You live, then, in the future, not in the past...

- Be that as it may, the released paintings do not put pressure on my life. It happens that students call me a classic, some kind of idol, but I treat this, sincerely speaking, as a joke, an exaggeration to which it is stupid to object: “What are you, what are you!”, thinking to myself: “Yes, yes are rightly said." Of course, if they put me in a single room, and an Italian artist in a suite, I will raise a scandal and gouge out my eye at the moment ...

- ... you just know your worth ...

— ... but, let's say, if everyone is in equal Spartan conditions necessary for work, it absolutely does not matter to me where to lay my head. Where we just did not live, including in these already times! Of course, now I want and will fly first class - I have the right to do so. Of course, I will drive a good car, but not so that everyone can see what a cool foreign car I have, but because it is convenient for me. Of course, I will build a house to live in, and not to show to guests. I also love good expensive clothes, but I don't wear them for show.

I remember that Zhenya Yevtushenko came to the WTO in a mink coat to the toes and deliberately opened the bamboo curtains so that everyone could see him, and Kemal (the richest man, an Iranian by birth) wore a very modest cashmere coat with a mink inside - for warmth, and not in order to show that he has money for expensive furs.

This is the quality, fortunately for me (I hope that fortunately), it is dear to me, another thing, I have a lot of materials, say, about the film "Twelve", and now we can edit 30 master class episodes, show how a picture is born ... Well, there is and is - I don't tremble over them, I live according to Pasternak: alive and only until the end.

Finishing some work, I didn’t sit on the boxes with the finished film in anticipation of fame - I easily forgot about what was filmed and didn’t worry: “Oh, God forbid, now it’s worse!”. Taken - page turned. This kind of burning bridges behind me was taught by the wonderful director Jerzy Kavalerovich, who is much older than me.

At one time at the Moscow Film Festival, I showed him my first film, “Among Strangers, A Stranger Among Ourselves” ... Then we sat in the Cinema House, drank, and he said, because he liked my work: “Immediately start a new one. After I shot the picture "Train", which was a huge success, I lost 20 years of my life - all these years I chose the script and thought: "It would not be worse." Compared and discarded: not that, again not that "...

“Energy was running out…

- That's it. It’s like asking a bearded man: “When you sleep, do you have a beard on the blanket or under it?”, And he stopped sleeping because he constantly thought about it and he was this way and that uncomfortable.

- Admit it, Nikita Sergeevich, do you like to receive awards?

— You see, if you get down to business, counting on bonuses and prizes, as a rule, you won’t get anything. I've never worked for awards, and while it's certainly nice to receive them, I have other measures of success and happiness. For example, when he was filming the film "Urga", he lived in the steppes of Mongolia and China. The atmosphere there was wonderful: here, it seems, calm, calm weather, and you raise your hand and you can touch the wind.

When I was working on the film “The Twelve”, I ran in the morning (I go jogging every day) and thought: “Nikita, if you were told:“ You will receive the Golden Lion or the Oscar, but for another tape, what would you become shoot?", and unequivocally answered himself: "Twelve." If you speak out, try to reach out to the audience - this is happiness ...

“Until my possessions bring profit ...”

- You look surprisingly young - how do you do it?

— (Smiling). I don’t read newspapers, I don’t read the Internet (especially about myself), so I feel great.

- Surely, hunting helps to relax - you, they say, have several lands in different parts of Russia ...

- There are two lands: near Nizhny Novgorod and near Vologda, - but I come there not as a hunter, but as a master. In the first, everything alive was knocked out, for more than four years we simply restored it, but the second is richer, of course, and did not require large investments. For some reason it seems to me that this is a rather lively matter, because if you treat the earth like a human being, it will answer you kindly.

I don’t know about you, but we have a problem with the Russian village - it is destroyed. The heart shrinks when you see how everything dies. If only there were some Swedes, Germans, and someone would do it, but no, we don’t need anyone, we all want it ourselves ...

How did I choose my land? In terms of the beauty of the landscape and the possibility of using it, this is a great outlet for me. So far, my possessions do not bring profit, but I am convinced that if there is wealth that is not subject to inflation, it is land. Sooner or later, everyone will understand that there is nothing more precious than her, especially if she is dear.

- Nikita Sergeevich, I am grateful to you for your frankness, but I would like to finish in some original way. Maybe at least a verse of a song about bees?

- Not (smiles) I won't sing. I’ll sing somewhere in a restaurant - come.

- For this you need to have a challah, "Suzuki" ...

- Of course, but here let Kirkorov sing to you - today I already took the rap for ten ...

If you find an error in the text, select it with the mouse and press Ctrl+Enter

Alexy II (Ridiger) Alexei Mikhailovich (1929) - priest, freemason,
Andropov (Erenstein-Lieberman) Yuri Vladimirovich (1914-1984) - security officer, politician, freemason,
Berezovsky (Gludman) Boris Abramovich (1946) - son of a Moscow rabbi, gesheftmacher, politician, freemason, 15,
Beria (Berman, Berson) Lavrenty Pavlovich (1899-1953) - Chekist,
Bovin (Luns) Alexander Evgenievich (1930) - journalist and diplomat, freemason.
Brezhnev (Ganopolsky) Leonid Ilyich (1906-1982) - politician,
Brezhneva (Goldberg) Victoria Pavlovna - niece of L.Z. Mekhlis, wife of L.I. Brezhnev, mother of Brezhneva G.L.
Voroshilova (Gorbman) Elizaveta (Golda) Davidovna (1887-1959) wife of K.E. Voroshilov, deputy. dir. Lenin Museum
Gaidar (grandmother - Ruva Lazarevna Solomyanskaya) Yegor Timurovich (1956) - politician, freemason, gesheftmacher
Gorbachev (Gaider) Mikhail Sergeevich (1931) - politician, gesheftmakher,
Grishin (Grissel) Viktor Vasilyevich (1914-1994) - party crat,
Gromyko (Kats Isaak) Andrey Andreevich (1909-1990) - diplomat,
Yevtushenko (Gangnut) Yevgeny Alexandrovich (1931) - writer, freemason,
Yeltsin (Eltsyn) Boris Nikolaevich. (Uncle - Eltsyn Boris Moiseevich. Since 1918 - member of the NKVD collegium. Then chairman of the Yekaterinburg (Sverdlovsk) provincial executive committee. In 1937 - shot) (1931) - politician, freemason,
Zhirinovsky (Edelstein) Vladimir Volfovich. Mother soon divorced E., married J. (1946), politician,
Zorin (Sonnenstein) - diplomat,
Kasparov (Weinstein - by father) Garry Kimovich (1963) - chess player, freemason,
Kirienko (Israitel) Sergey - gesheftmakher and politician, freemason,
Kozyrev (Friedman) Andrei Vladimirovich (1951) - politician, freemason
Kramarov Savely - film actor, after emigration - married a Jewess and converted to Judaism
Krupskaya (Fishberg - literally - "fish mountain", party nicknames - "Fish", "Lamprey") Nadezhda Konstantinovna (1869-1939) - wife or cover (?) of V.I. Ulyanov-Blank,
Kuchma (Kuchman Leiba Davidovich) - President of Ukraine, freemason,
Lenin (Blank) Vladimir Ilyich (1870-1924) - revolutionary, Freemason, Chairman of the Council of People's (i.e. Jewish) Commissars
Luzhkov (Katz) Yuri Mikhailovich (1936) - politician and gesheftmakher, freemason,
Matvienko (Bubley) Valentina Ivanovna (1949.) - governor, gesheftmakher,
Nemtsov (father - Efim Davydovich Neiman, mother - Dina Yakovlevna Eidman) Boris Efimovich (1959). Great-nephew of Y.M. Sverdlov, relative of Naina Yeltsina (Girina), politician, freemason, gesheftmacher,
Ponomarev (Krogius) Boris Nikolaevich (1905) - politician, academician,
Popov (Neumann) Gavriil Kharitonovich (1936) "Greek" - Doctor of Sciences, Mayor of Moscow, Freemason, Gesheftmacher,
Potanin (Wartburg) Vladimir, gesheftmakher.
Primakov (Kirshblat-Finkelstein) Evgeny Maksimovich (1928) - journalist, academician, politician, freemason,
Pugacheva (Pevzner) Alla Borisovna (1949) - singer, freemason,
Putin (Shalomov) Vladimir Vladimirovich - security officer and politician, freemason,
Rutskoy Alexander Vladimirovich (1947) - politician, provocateur, Freemason agent of the CIA since the 1980s. Mother - the seller of a beer stall Zinaida Iosifovna,
Rybakov (Aronov) Anatoly Naumovich (1911-1998) - writer, author of the book "Children of the Arbat", freemason,
Sakharov (Safriano) Andrei Dmitrievich (1921-1989) - academician and politician, freemason,
Sobchak (Finkelstein) Anatoly Alexandrovich (1937-2000) gesheftmakher and politician, freemason.
Solzhenitsyn (Solzhenitser) Alexander Isaevich (Isaakovich) (1918) - dissident writer, politician.
Solomentsev (Zaltsman) Mikhail Sergeevich (1913) - politician.
Suslov - (Syuss) Mikhail Alexandrovich (1902-1982) - ideologist of the CPSU,
Sygolenko (Sygal Chaim) Kirill - adjutant of the commander of the OUN Ukrainian Insurgent Army, during the occupation carried out the genocide of the Jewish population, completely destroyed the Jews in the cities of Olevsk and Dubrovitsy, then an agent of the American special services,
Ustinov (Ulbricht) Dmitry Fedorovich (1908-1984) - military man, 17,
Khazanov (Faibusovich) Gennady Moiseevich - pop artist, freemason.
Khodorkovsky (Hovert) Mikhail - gesheftmakher,
Khrushchev (Perlmutter) Nikita Sergeevich (1894-1971) - politician,
Chernomyrdin (Schleer) Viktor Stepanovich (1938) - gesheftmakher, politician, freemason,
Chubais (Sagal) Anatoly Borisovich (1955) - politician, gesheftmacher, freemason,
Yakovlev (Epstein, or Yakov Lev) Alexander Nikolaevich (1923-2005) - "architect of perestroika", doctor of sciences, freemason,
Yakunin (Edelstein) Gleb Pavlovich (1934) - clergyman and politician, freemason

Kirkorov - maternal grandmother Lydia Manion
Clara Novikova - purebred Clara Borisovna Herzer
Konstantin Khabensky - purebred
Konstantin Ernst - purebred
Kristina Orbakaite is the daughter of a Jewess Pugacheva and a Lithuanian Jew Orbakas
Ksenia Anatolyevna Sobchak - grandfather, Boris Moiseevich Narusov, was the commandant of Herzberg
Larisa Dolina - was born in the family of Alexander Markovich and Galina Izrailevna Kudelman
Leonid Arkadyevich Yakubovich - purebred
Leonid Zakoshansky - purebred
Leonid Mikhailovich Mlechin - purebred
Leonid Osipovich Utyosov - Lazar Iosifovich Weissbein
Leonid Parfenov - by mother
Lolita Milyavskaya - father Mark Lvovich Gorelik
Maxim Galkin - purebred
Maxim Leonardovich Shevchenko - halachic
Marianna Maksimovskaya - purebred Jewess
Maria Sittel - father "German", mother - Jewish
Masha Rasputina - purebred
Mikael Leonovich Tariverdiev - purebred
Mikhail Barshchevsky - purebred
Menachem Erikovich Zalman
Mikhail Vladimirovich Leontiev - purebred
Mikhail Glebovich Osokin - purebred
Mikhail Zhvanetsky - purebred
Mikhail Zadornov - halachic Latvian Jew
Mikhail Zelensky - reference
Mikhail Shirvindt - purebred
Mikhail Shufutinsky - purebred
Nadezhda Babkina - mother, Tamara Alexandrovna Babkina (Chistyakova), a Jewish woman from a family of manufacturers. Babkina's husband is a Jew Evgeny Gor
Nike Borzov - Jewish
Nikolai Barashko
Nikita Mikhalkov - mother, Jewish poetess Natalya Petrovna Konchalovskaya
Nikolai Viktorovich Baskov - by his mother. married to Jewish Svetlana Shpigel
Nikolai Fomenko - purebred
Oleg Gazmanov - mother Zinaida Abramovna
Petrosyan Evgeny Vaganovich - Armenian Jew
Regina Dubovitskaya - "Dubina Regovitska", Polish-Armfnian Jewess
Rina Zelyonaya is a purebred. Jewish husband Vladimir Blumenfeld Sasha Tsekalo - halachic, father "Ukrainian", mother Jewish
Sergei Yervandovich Kurginyan - Armenian Jew, one of the Trotskyist dissidents
Sergey Leonidovich Dorenko - thoroughbred
Sergey Yurievich Minaev - purebred
Sofia Rotaru - halachic Jewess Sofia Mikhailovna Rotar Tamara Gverdtsiteli - Georgian Jewess Tamara Mikhailovna Kofman
Tatyana Nikitichna Tolstaya - purebred
Timati is a Halachic half-breed. mother Simona Yakovlevna Chernomorskaya
Tina Karol - Tatyana Lieberman (Singer representing Ukraine at Eurovision)
Tina Kandelaki - Armenian Jewess (by mother)
Chulpan Khamatova is a half-breed by her mother. married to Jew Alexander Shein
Edvard Radzinsky - purebred Polish Jew
Edita Piekha - Polish Jewess
Elina Avramovna Bystritskaya - purebred, born in the family of Abraham Petrovich Bystritsky and Esther Isaakovna Bystritskaya Yulia Olegovna Volkova - half-breed (tatu soloist)
Yuri Vladimirovich Nikulin - thoroughbred
Yuri Dmitrievich Kuklachev - a Jewish father, married to a Jewess Elena Isaakovna
Yuri Yulianovich Shevchuk - thoroughbred

The government of the city of Moscow Y. Katz (Luzhkov). 1999
Mayor - Y. Luzhkov (Katz) (Jew)
Vice Mayor - Shantsev (communist)
Deputy Prime Minister of Moscow - Ordzhonikidze (Georgian)
Foreign Policy - Yastrzhembsky (Polish Jew)
Small and medium business - Ioffe (Jew)
Construction industry - Resin (Jew)
Financial control - Shor (Jew)
Press Service - Choi (Korean)
Prefect of the center of Moscow - Musician (Jew)
Manager of City Hall Affairs - Shakhnovsky (Jew)
Fuel and Energy Complex of Moscow - Lapir (Jew)
Transport and communications - Korsak (Jew)
Urban development - Topelson (Jew)
Extra-budgetary funds - Krasnyansky and Sternfeld (Jews)
Building Resources - Rizel (Jew)
Inter-regional ties - Bakirov (Azerbaijani)
Taxes and fees - Chernik (Jew)
Sports - Kofman (Jew)
Mayor's full-time advisers - Schneider, Norkin, Perelygin (all Jews)
The closest like-minded people to the Fatherland movement are Kobzon and Khazanov (Jews)
The head of the election headquarters of the "Fatherland" - Boos (Jew)
Candidate ╪1 in the list of "Fatherland" - Primakov (Finkelstein) - a Jew

Jews - about Russians

- Chubais: “Why are you worried about these people? Well, thirty million will die out... I have read all of Dostoevsky and now I feel nothing for this man except physical hatred; when I see in his books the thought that the Russian people are a special people, chosen by God, I want to tear them to pieces.”

- Novodvorskaya: “Russians cannot be allowed into European civilization with rights, they were put at the bucket and they did the right thing.”

K. Sobchak: "Russia has become a country of genetic trash."

I. Yurgens: “Russians interfere with Russia - the bulk of our compatriots live in the last century and do not want to develop.”

V. Pozner: “I am not a Russian person, this is not my homeland, I didn’t grow up here, I don’t feel completely at home here.”

Y. Pivovarov: “Russia needs to lose (don't be scared!) Siberia and the Far East”.

Khazanov Boris: “I used to be ashamed of this homeland.”

Artemy Troitsky: “I consider Russian men for the most part animals, creatures not even of the second, but of the third grade.”

You can continue to quote such statements indefinitely. Something similar was said and printed by Viktor Shenderovich, and Viktor Erofeev, and Tatyana Tolstaya, and Yulia Latynina, and many other creatures of the “first class”.
A. Konchalovsky, who received the Silver Lion at the Venice Film Festival for a film about the Holocaust, said that if Russia closes the borders, he will immediately emigrate: “I have dual citizenship, the second is French. In this case, I will simply give up Russian.” The bribe-taker Ulyukaev, while still at large, bequeathed to his son: “Go, my son, go away!”
Lyudmila Ulitskaya: “I am ashamed of the people who have lost their moral guidelines.”

4 Jews

He abandoned mathematics because of its monotony, pedagogy - because of political disagreements with the school leadership. He came to the world of cinema in the early 90s, and at the end of the 2000s he was expelled from the Union of Cinematographers for criticizing Nikita Mikhalkov. In an interview with the site, film critic Viktor Matizen told who first poked him into his Jewishness, how Medinsky strangles freedom in the cinema, and why Mikhalkov's latest films are terrible.

Can you tell us a little about your parents?

- Mom is a Jewish woman from Velizh, her grandfather was a rabbi, and her father was a revolutionary who broke with his family, ended up in hard labor, and after the revolution he settled in Leningrad. Dad - from the "Catherine" Germans who lived in a colony near Leningrad. In 1952, when they graduated, there was no work for Jews or Germans in the city, and they went to Dagestan, where there were so many nationalities that the personnel officers did not pay attention to the fifth column in the passport. Mom taught German all her life, dad set up physical experiments - first in Makhachkala, then in the Novosibirsk Akademgorodok, he defended his candidate at Kapitsa in the presence of Landau. They lived in perfect harmony, never once heard any bickering or rude words. I learned that I am a Jew at the age of seven, when in Zelenograd some kid attacked me for no reason with the words: “Oh, you, a Jewish muzzle!” Sometimes it seems to me that a sense of the Jewish spirit is an innate instinct. The poet and critic Kostya Kedrov told how a psychiatrist friend once took him to a psychiatric hospital on a tour. He led from mild to severe cases, and finally led him to a cage where a half-naked and rumbling humanoid creature was sitting behind bars, which, according to the doctor, had generally lost the ability to articulate speech and only hissed. Kostya stared at him, and suddenly, through this hissing, he heard the same thing that I heard from this kid: “Wow, wow, a Jewish muzzle!”

By your first education you are a mathematician, and your diploma had a very beautiful title: “On the Monotonicity of a Statistical Criterion”.

– Strictly speaking, it was precisely its monotonicity that was the subject of the proof of the criterion. At first, I thought about a scientific career. But when I worked for a month on my thesis, immersed in the formulas and disconnected from the outside world, I realized that mathematics is such a drug that will just blow my mind. And he went to work in a school - one might say, among the people. I took three sixth grades, hoping to bring it to graduation, and during this time to find myself a less abstract occupation. But I got a taste and instead of five I worked for 11 years, graduated from five classes, I still communicate with old students who scattered around the world.

They write that they tried to kick you out of school?

- My tongue has always run ahead of fear, and in the "scoop" this was not welcomed. You blurt out something in the lesson, like that the operations of arithmetic are divided into capitalist ones - add and multiply, and communist ones - subtract and divide, it will reach the administration - and what should she do with such an educator of youth? Drive, of course. And how can you kick him out if the children of the academic elite study with him? Children and friends from the teaching environment raised their parents, they put pressure on the director and did not allow me to be fired - who else will prepare their children for prestigious universities?

Do you have a favorite teacher story?

- Easily. One day a pipe burst in my math class, and I had to take classes in the literature class. So, you know, exemplary. I walk around the classroom, talking about polyhedrons, I see Pushkin's corner. Under the portrait of the poet is a home-made poster with a poem: "Courage, sincerity, soldering, enthusiasm - from every spark, together - a fire!" And signature: A.S. Pushkin. My eyes just popped out. The class looks blankly: it is written that Pushkin means Pushkin. I bring the lesson to the end, wait for the hostess and politely ask: “Alexandra Petrovna, what is this?” "You can't read?" - answers. “Forgive me, but this is not Pushkin.” - "And what about you, have you read all of Pushkin?" - "Not". “Then I have nothing to talk about with you.” A couple of days later I inform her that I leafed through the complete works of Pushkin and did not find this poem. "So what?" - "Do not understand". “Of course, you don’t know that new works by Pushkin are still appearing in print.” I catch her at the word: “Is the old man still writing?” She gives me a contemptuous look, admitting that I don’t know that Pushkin has been dead for a long time, and explains: “As a result of the search for our Pushkinists, unknown poems of the great poet still appear.” “And how can you prove that Pushkin wrote this?!” I ask, finally remembering that it is up to the attributer to prove the validity of the attribution. "This is obvious to every educated person." “Of course, I’m not as educated as you, but it’s not obvious to me.” - "This is clear. Do you even know what Pushkin wrote to the Decembrists in Siberia?” – ““In the depths of Siberian ores”?” “That's right,” she is surprised as if she heard a talking monkey. “And what did Odoevsky say to him?” - "What kind of flame will ignite from a spark?" - "Right. And what did Pushkin write to him in response?!” - "I have no idea". - “But then he wrote:“ From each - a spark, together - a fire. Do you understand what kind of fire the great poet writes about? About the fire of the revolution! This is the answer of a materialist to an idealist and a prophecy about the role of the revolutionary masses in history!” “Yes, Pushkin could not write this!!!” I scream, losing ground under my feet. “Do you even understand what you are saying? PUSHKIN - could not? The great Russian poet - and could not?! Pushkin could do anything! I don’t know how long this Pushkin poem still hung in the literature classroom, because soon I quit school.

And then you changed the image of a mathematics teacher to an industrial climber and, while studying at VGIK, painted facades?

– First, I tried to enroll in graduate school at the Literary Institute – by that time I already had some publications, and for admission I showed a treatise on Trifonov’s prose, which, as I was told already in the post-Soviet period, was drawing for a PhD thesis. But I was turned away for the same deviation from the sacred principles of socialist realism that Trifonov committed. Then I entered VGIK in absentia, because I had loved cinema for a long time and received some film education in the Akademgorodok and student film clubs, and a VGIK student card made it possible to go to theaters. While I was studying, I was engaged in tutoring and covenanted - I collected ferns, rafted timber, laid sewers, painted facades in a cradle for two years.

Did they look at you more liberally at VGIK?

- In general, yes, because they issued a red diploma. True, our master Elizaveta Mikhailovna Smirnova once said: “Viktor, I return your semester work without evaluation and I must say: if you continue to write in this spirit, then your spirit will never be in any Soviet publication. And in general, why did you go into film criticism? If you didn’t give up your mathematics, you would be a doctor of science at your 34 years old. And you? Do you paint facades? Meanwhile, on facades, I earned more than a doctor of sciences - I started as a simple hard worker with 850 rubles a month, and ended up as a foreman with 1200 rubles. And this is a trifle compared to what our "dad" Valera Bershtein had, who kept several brigades and was probably an underground millionaire. The man was colorful. He liked to repeat that the main contradiction of socialism is the contradiction between the façade and the interior. But I didn’t manage to quit mathematics, it overtook me twice more in the form of problems that I stumbled upon. Literally. He rolled stones - developed the theory of rolling polyhedra, pulled together a rickety bookcase with a rope - deduced an elementary theory of the rigidity of structures with flexible elements.

The end of the 80s - the beginning of the 90s is called the period of stormy amateur performances in Russian cinema. How do you rate it?

– After the Fifth Congress of Cinematographers in May 1986, everything that was impossible became possible. At this time, “shelf” films were released, the paintings of Sokurov, “Little Vera” by Pichula, “Prorva” by Dykhovichny, “Taxi Blues” by Lungin, “Intergirl” and “Anchor, more anchor!” Pyotr Todorovsky, "Two Captains-2" by Debizhev, "City of Zero" and "Regicide" by Shakhnazarov ... 300 paintings were published per year. Of course, most of this flow, as in the Soviet years, was film waste, but where would we be without it? The important thing is that the freedom acquired by the cinema of that time has been preserved for a long time and is felt even now, although they are trying in every possible way to strangle it.

You are an important witness to the history of censorship. How is the current one different from the Soviet one?
- The fact that it does not recognize itself as censorship and pretends to be a fight against the falsification of history or a fight for morality. The main censor now is the Minister of Culture, who has arrogated to himself the right to refuse state funding for objectionable projects or such opposition directors as Vitaly Mansky, and not to issue distribution certificates to objectionable films. Deputies and Orthodox activists are eager to become censors. Moreover, in Soviet times, the filmmakers still had some opportunity to defend it, but now they are completely powerless. Yes, and the censors went different. The then sometimes tried to save the film by amputating some parts and releasing them even crippled, but these are immediately drowned. And they instill fear that discourages producers and directors from going into the unknown. It's a bad time for cinema.

What recent works would you like to highlight and which young directors? What do you think about The Queen of Spades and The Apprentice in particular?

- First of all, I would like to note that last year, solemnly declared the year of Russian cinema, turned out to be a year of decline. Several large-budget projects like Viking, Duelist and Icebreaker failed, only Konchalovsky's Paradise, Tverdovsky Jr.'s Zoology, and Bordukov's The Box, which traveled around dozens of supporting festivals, enjoyed international festival success. As for The Queen of Spades, the costumes are good, Ksenia Rapoport and Tchaikovsky's music. In The Apprentice, I liked the idea and didn't like its implementation, because Serebrennikov did not consider it necessary to properly fit the play into the conditions of the modern school. For a theatrical production, this means nothing, and the film loses its credibility. If we talk about the young, then last year Anton Bilzho successfully debuted with Dream Fish and Alexei Krasovsky with Collector. And there were a dozen or two excellent short films, which show that they were filmed by people who were not constrained by the "Medin" censorship.

In the mid-90s you worked on the book "Nikita". How did this work start? What ended?

The publishing house offered me to write a book about him and his films. I preferred a different form - to take a long interview with Nikita Sergeevich and add his diary entries. We talked for three months, parted on "you" and good friends. Many years later, I heard more than once that in this book I “stripped” him. But I didn’t have such a task, I just asked questions that I wanted to get answers to. He answered - and, it seems to me, honestly.

Later, he could no longer give honest answers?

- He was spoiled by big money, the position of chairman of the Union of Cinematographers, that is, the country's chief cinematographer, and proximity to the supreme power. He lost his conscience, and with it a talent that does not get along with falsehood and leaves a person. Mikhalkov's recent films are terrible. He sacrificed credibility for the sake of effect in his early paintings, but then it was something like a game with the audience's perception, and now it has become elementary thimble.

In 2009, you were expelled from the Union of Cinematographers for criticizing Mikhalkov's actions. Couldn't you have kept peaceful relations with him?

- I could, but only at the cost of losing my reputation, which is more important for me than peaceful relations with such a chairman of the Investigative Committee.