Parenting 

World State. The theory of creating a single world state. World state: utopia or probable future

Justifying their desire for world domination, violating the sovereignty of other states, in particular through the construction of their military bases, influential circles in the United States also widely use the theory of a "world state", according to which peoples must renounce their sovereignty and submit to a single "world government" in the interests of supposedly deliverance of mankind from wars” and crises allegedly caused by sovereignty.

This theory was based for a long time on the confidence of the US ruling classes in the monopoly possession of atomic weapons, in the advantage of having a system of foreign military bases around the USSR. The reactionary essence and utopian nature of this theory have already been revealed in the works of Soviet scientists. However, its most important official function - an apology for military bases in foreign territories - still remains in the shadows.

American lawyer W. McClud in his extensive work “The World Legal Order. The Possible Contribution of the People of the United States” advocates the creation of a “world community”, a “world order” based on “universal law” and supposedly already in force “supranational customary law”.

Modern bourgeois jurists and sociologists see the reason that the UN was not up to the task assigned to it not in the creation of aggressive blocs and military bases, not in the desire for "world leadership" on the part of the reactionary circles of the United States, but in the sovereign independence of states. They try to prove that the rapid development of science and technology allegedly eliminates the democratic principles of international communication between states and international law, that sovereignty is supposedly an “obsolete” and “dangerous” idea for the very existence of mankind, which it should abandon as soon as possible.

The idea of ​​creating a "world state" practically means the denial of the peaceful coexistence of states with different socio-economic systems and the liquidation of the UN with its principle of unanimity of the great powers. In a "world state" controversial issues should be resolved not by agreement of sovereign states, but under the coercion of the so-called "international police", based on military bases attached to it in all corners of the globe and being an instrument of military violence of some powers led by the United States over others.

The theory of a “world state” is an ideological cover for the organization of such expansionist, aggressive blocs directed against socialist countries as NATO, SEATO, CENTO, the Western European Union, etc., which, in turn, are steps on the path to the military-political integration of capitalist countries under the auspices of the United States.

Calling on the United States to create a worldwide base system, J. Weller says: “The most appropriate basis on which a nation can establish a specified system of military bases (besides such a basis as the threat demonstrated to us during the war) is to assume responsibility as global citizen". Such a "world citizen" (i.e., the United States) is conceived by him as an armed leading center of the "world state", owning military bases in foreign territories.


Many supporters of the "world government", for example, J. Burnham, directly put on the agenda the question of the need for war using a system of military bases against "recalcitrant" states and peoples who do not want to enter the "world state" under the auspices of the United States. He writes: “We see that in our time no world federation can be achieved voluntarily. Other than the Communists, only the United States has the power to enforce the idea of ​​federation by force. It can only be created if the United States, while retaining monopoly control over atomic weapons, assumes responsibility for leading the world.

Under the conditions of the "world state", according to the plans of its authors, the peoples will be subordinated to the "world police", based on a system of military bases in the hands of the United States. Granting to the "world government" the right to establish its military bases as "police posts" on the territories of all the united states, to dispose of these countries as a springboard, to quarter the troops of one state on the territory of another, etc., would in fact mean the complete dominance of American financial and military circles in foreign territories. It would be "the American armed world".

Relying on these bases and troops, the "world government" would have unlimited opportunities to suppress the struggle of the peoples against colonialism, against enslaving treaties and concessions, for their self-determination and liberation from capitalist slavery. The creation of a "world state" would mean further expansion and consolidation of the American empire, "legally" relying on American military bases and troops in foreign territories. Fortunately, the peoples are firmly guarding their independence, and even such an ardent geopolist as N. Spykman had to admit that the plans of a "world state" were unrealistic. The peoples, including the American people, do not want the creation of an "international police" either.

World government- the concept of a single political power over all mankind. Various conspiracy theories assign the function of world government to various real or fictional structures (UN, G7, G20 - G20, Freemasonry, Jewish Freemasonry, Bilderberg Club, Committee of 300, Illuminati). There is currently no world army, executive, legislative or judicial power with jurisdiction covering the entire planet.

"Secret world government"- one of the main terms of the conspiracy theory, denoting a narrow group of people, for example, the owners of the largest international corporations, which, according to supporters of such theories, determines the emergence and controls the development of the main events taking place in the world, on the way to the "new world order" .

One of the goals of the secret world government attributed to it by conspiracy theorists is creation of a society built on the principle of the "golden billion". According to adherents, such a "golden billion" includes members of the "highest guilds" and representatives of the "most worthy and developed" nations. Other nations (Africans, Asians) are assigned the role of serving black production, mining, and the entire infrastructure. This “useful part” allegedly amounts to about one and a half billion, while the rest of the population (more than 4 billion), according to supporters of the theory, is classified as “superfluous” and is systematically destroyed with the help of alcohol, smoking, drugs, and revolutions.

Freemasonry is one of the most popular groups featured in secret world government conspiracy theories. Sometimes the secret world government is presented as fused with the world's financial institutions.

TYPES OF STATEHOOD

Daniil Andreev writes that the national structure can be of several types.

1. Liquid state of statehood. The inception of a centralized state power. Constant clashes of poorly organized constituent units among themselves. The power of tribal egregors and vampiric formations such as Velga (chaos, multiplier of victims and suffering). The influence of the superpeople dyad, still very young, mainly on the aesthetic and religious spheres of consciousness.
Examples: Egypt of the era of nomes, Vedic India, Greece of the era of policies, Europe in the early Middle Ages.

2. Solid-viscous state of statehood soft enough for transformative work. Restriction of tyrannical tendencies by the balance of socio-political forces. State leadership is carried out by the demiurge through egregors. His marriage to the Ideal Cathedral Soul.
Examples: Egypt before Tutankhamun, the Buddhist states of India and Southeast Asia, the Tang and Song empires in China, Athens in the time of Pericles.

3. Extremely solid statehood. Despotic power-colossus. The tyranny of the demon of great power. The preservation of the ethereal incarnation of the Cathedral Soul, but the extreme narrowing of its freedom of action, that is, its captivity in the blocks of statehood. At the end of this stage, and sometimes even earlier, the demiurge withdraws his sanction from the demon of statehood.
Examples: the great tyrannical empires, Assyria, Carthage, Rome, Baghdad, the empires of Genghis Khan, Tamerlane, Spain of the 16th century, Britain of the 18th-19th centuries, the empire of Napoleon, the state of Hitler, etc.

4. Hierocracy. Capture by the egregor of the church of power-creating forces. Or its development into a vampiric monster similar to Witzraors, declaring worldwide claims and transferring its abode from the sakwala of egregors to Gashsharva (papacy at the end of the Middle Ages); or - closing within ethnic boundaries and sucking out internal sources (Tibet). In the first case, it is the struggle against it by the dyads of the suprapeople and the synclite, while rebelling even against the distorted myth of international religion. In the second case, the freedom of action of the light dyad is limited by the infraphysics of metaculture, on the one hand, and by the forces of the Highest Transmyth of international religion, on the other.

5. Fragmentation of a single structure of the superpeople into many solid state units. The development of local forces that escaped the control of hierarchies. Weakening of the active creative force of the latter. The state of the Cathedral Soul, similar to the state of a deep illness.
Examples: Mediterranean in the 4th-5th centuries AD. e.; Muslim countries after the Caliphate; Germany after the Thirty Years' War.

6. foreign enslavement. A nation order that has become an instrument of other hierarchies pursuing their own goals, which have nothing to do with this super-people. The position of the Cathedral Soul, equivalent to the state of slavery.

7. A state structure of a softened type, created under the condition of the socio-ethical maturity of the super-people and the absence of an external threat. The subordination of the state principle directly to the forces of the demiurge. The beginning of the withering away of the principle of violence. The opportunity that opens up before the hierarchies to prepare an ideal national order. The position of the Cathedral Soul as the wife of the demiurge.
Examples: to date, this type has been achieved only in certain small countries, in its purest form - in Scandinavia, Switzerland. It can be hoped that in the future this type will acquire supranational dimensions, only under which its supranational metacultural fruits are possible.

8. International Association. While only theoretically conceivable state formation, transitional to planetary unification. Co-creation of demiurges.

9. Ideal national structure. The abolition of the state. The transformation of the state system of mankind into Brotherhood. The perfect structure of society, only in which the ethereal expression of the Eternal Feminine born by the hierarchies can be accepted.

UNIFIED WORLD STATE

On the way to achieving universal Unity, the main obstacle is the state, as a rigid structure based on the energies of power, up to tyranny. On the other hand, the state is a means against social chaos. The state unites people not under the Spirit of Unity, but as the highest authority that prevents the danger of a war of all against all, from the danger of falling into chaos. Some countries are striving to strengthen the all-round dependence of the individual on the state, on the authority in whose hands the state apparatus is located: the parties, the army, the leaders. Many states only disguise themselves as an apparatus of general economic balance and protection of individual rights, and the true goals of these states are world economic domination. They have so many times plunged the world into the abyss of wars and tyranny; where is the guarantee that they will not plunge him again and again?

The transformation of the world state into a brotherhood is not possible by external means alone.
Just as the generation of Israelites who, having left Egypt with Moses, had to give way to other generations before the tribe entered the Promised Land, so the generation of the middle of the 20th century, poisoned by the air of the era of world wars, was destined to leave the arena in order to reign the long-awaited order, glimpsing us through the enfilade of three successively enlightened periods. Because this system is not an external establishment. It will be organic and naturally necessary only when the moral character of the new generations makes it impossible to abuse freedom and turn it into anarchy. No measures of re-education are sufficient to fundamentally transform the psyche of two billion people, which has already been formed in a different atmosphere, saturated with blood and fanaticism. Of course, millions of the best of those who live now would meet the highest requirements of that remote era. But it is necessary that they be answered not by the best, but by the overwhelming majority, so that entire generations are brought up by the Rose of the World, as people of an ennobled image.

Transformation of the essence of the state - after all, what is it? Disarmament of all, true democracy, mitigation of laws, easing of punishments? Of course; but all this is not enough. The essence of the state is soulless automatism. It is guided by the material interests of larger or smaller human masses, understood as a whole. It is indifferent to the interests of the individual as such. Spirituality, on the other hand, is completely unknown to him, just as it is unknown to Witzraors and egregors, and it cannot have the slightest idea about the spiritual good - both of the individual and the people.

The meaning of the first stage of the reign of the Rose of the World is to achieve universal material prosperity and to create the prerequisites for the transformation of the Federation of Member States into a universal monolith. That during this period the most democratic socio-political institutions will become the property of all countries - this goes without saying. Huge communities of lawyers, teachers, psychologists, lawyers and religious figures will revise all codes, reform the system of legal norms, procedural norms, soften the scale of punishments and the very principle of punishment will begin to give way to the principle of healing the criminal. During the same period, those cadres of workers of a new type will be trained, which are necessary for carrying out universal reforms, marking the next, second, stage: the stage of transformation of a universal, already softened state into a Brotherhood.

It must be assumed that at the beginning of the second stage the term of the general judicial reform will fall.

Still, the jury - at least some varieties of this court - is, apparently, the most progressive form of court that exists today. But this is by no means the ceiling of development. The most serious shortcomings of this form have been pointed out countless times, and moreover by people standing on a variety of positions. It was pointed out that the principle of free hiring of a professional defense lawyer is imperfect in that it contributes to the transformation of a lawyer into a kind of virtuoso, using eloquence to replace genuine, humanly passionate participation in the fate of the client. It is unlikely that anyone will dispute that the principle of a professional prosecutor's office is imperfect in that nothing saves the prosecutor from degenerating into an official who invariably sees a criminal in each accused and is interested only in that side of his personality, which, in the opinion of the prosecutor, determined the commission of the crime. As for the principle of the jury, it is imperfect because cases that are often psychologically complex, requiring not only the most thorough study, but also high culture, insight and justice on the part of the judges, expose random, unskilled, often even underdeveloped persons to consideration; it is ridiculous to think that a few hours of help from specialists can compensate for their insufficiency.

At present, it is apparently impossible to replace such a form of court with anything better. This will become possible when the leadership of the Rose of the World, which has been going on for several decades, will ensure the formation of a cadre of judicial workers of a new type.

The young man will have to begin to prepare himself for this kind of activity while still in college, having chosen the humanitarian one out of three biases. The system of upbringing and education outlined at the beginning of this chapter will adopt some additional features in the higher legal school, providing for the formation of future judges. Probably, special attention will be paid to the development of such aspects of nature, which will protect more than others from official, formal, and even more selfish, attitude towards a person. The study, along with this, of the arts and philosophy, the history of culture, the history of ethics, the history of judicial institutions, psychology, psychopathology, psychiatry will develop innate insight, understanding of the ailments of the human soul and a correct understanding of the ways to eliminate them. The notion of the value of the human person and the duty of a judge-healer, which has entered into flesh and blood, will stimulate an extremely cautious, careful, warm approach to the defendant. Because the view will be established on him as a patient, accessible to treatment - not necessarily a patient in the modern psychiatric sense, but a patient in the sense of damage to the ethical structure of the soul. The role of such judicial figures cannot be overestimated: they are the saviors of human souls, and humanity needs them no less than doctors, teachers and priests. Someone will object: such ideal persons are found in units, as exceptions. – But is it really so rare even now, in a completely different, oppressive, poisoned atmosphere, that teachers and doctors of the highest and purest ethical character are formed? Where is the reason to believe that the pedagogical system, which is specifically directed towards this, pursuing precisely this goal and acting, moreover, in the most favorable social atmosphere, will turn out to be powerless to select from a billion young men a few million who, after a number of years of work on them, will be able to adequately bear the burden of judgment over a criminal and his - not re-education, but rather - healing?

It seems to me - although it is possible, of course, that in reality it will turn out differently - that workers of this kind will make up several groups: investigators, judges and re-educators in the proper sense of the word. Now it is untimely and inappropriate to go into the details of this reform, especially for me, who has neither professional legal education nor experience. I will allow myself to express only one thought: that instead of the institutions of the prosecutor, the defense counsel and the jury, something completely different will be established over time. The debate of the parties will take place, as now, but it will no longer be a struggle of two eloquences, not a competition of artists, one of whom, on duty, denigrates the defendant, and the other tries to whitewash him. These will be successive speeches of not two, but three persons: all of them can be conditionally called interpreters. Using the materials of the investigation and the results of personal communication with the defendant, two of them offer two different interpretations of the case under consideration. The third seeks to bring both interpretations closer together, if possible, to reconcile them or to identify the advantageous aspects of both. Such a reconciliation of points of view will rarely be feasible in the first round of speeches; however, some steps towards rapprochement will be made. Then the second and third rounds follow. Judges who do not participate in the debate, but who are present at them, thus receive the most profound and objective idea of ​​the case, an idea of ​​it on the merits. The right to speak is reserved, of course, for the defendant as well. Judges, on the other hand, turn out to be not random, unprepared people, like most assessors who are not accustomed to understanding complex psychological and psychopathological collisions, but carefully trained specialists of a new formation. There is nothing to be embarrassed if the training of such judges takes not five years, as it is now, but at least ten: in order for the “punitive system” (how vile this expression alone is!) to turn into a system of healing, moral and social resurrection of a person, no number of years no regrets.

And of course, prisons as a form of punishment will forever recede into the realm of the past. The word "camp" is now also very compromised: it brings to mind pictures of all sorts of Potmas, Buchenwalds and Norilsks. But I will have to use it conditionally here, for lack of a better one. Now they are trying to re-educate in some places with the help of labor; it is not surprising that the results of this are so weak. Most criminals are at a very low general cultural level; they are people who have gone astray as teenagers and have an insurmountable aversion to work; it is naive to expect that in a camp or prison they will change their attitude towards him just because they are given a shoe hammer or jointer in their hands. The main thing is to raise their general cultural level, then they will feel the charm of work, and not necessarily handicraft or production (after all, not all people have a soul for such work!), But also for mental work. And by raising the general cultural level, I mean not the study of some technical specialty, but specifically general, that is, mental, ethical, aesthetic, social and spiritual culture. Something is being done now in this sense, it seems, by some religious and charitable organizations abroad, especially Catholic and Methodist ones. They should be involved in this work in every possible way, their experience should be studied and some of their methods should be mastered. In any case, the unwillingness to weigh down their mental baggage, the inertia, laziness and carelessness of such criminals should first be weakened by the provision that their imprisonment will not be a stupidly immovable number of years (with a short term, the criminal blithely waits for the longed-for day, and with a long term, he becomes "do not give a damn" about everything in the world), but the function of correcting the criminal, the more successfully he completes the course of general humanitarian education plus a special course of some socially useful profession, and the sooner the team of his re-educators recognizes him as prepared for life in freedom, the sooner he will leave the walls of the camp.

There can hardly be any doubt that the combination of a high level of general well-being with the inevitable results of a universal educational system and with the general psychological climate of the second stage will reduce the number of offenses from year to year. If we consider that in some Scandinavian countries, even at the beginning of our century, the number of criminal offenses decreased to several dozen a year, then it will not seem utopian to be sure that under these conditions the number of them all over the world will gradually fall to several thousand a year and will steadily decline. and in the future.

Certain principles of the upbringing-educational course through which employees of the investigation, court and re-education will be trained will form the basis of the work of other educational institutions graduating economists, business executives, engineers, technicians serving in institutions. I mean those principles that pursue the goal of educating in each of these workers a person in the highest sense of the word. The functions of even the institution that now bears the discredited names of the police or militia will change. In the second stage of the reign of the Rose of the World, this institution will also perform, among other things, the functions of a criminal investigation department. But with each passing decade, this sector within the police will play an ever smaller role. Gradually, the police will become a service of public convenience, a collective and individual universal service, and work in this field will become as honorable and respected by all as any other.

The state is made up of people. People who embody state power at all its levels are mostly formal, callous, dry, cold. It is impossible to get rid of bureaucracy either by administrative measures or by appeals to conscience and a sense of duty, if this sense of duty and professional conscience have not entered the flesh and blood of a person from an early age. The system of the Rose of the World will train the cadres of the world state in such a way that negative qualities will be replaced by their opposites. So that everyone, turning to representatives of power or entering an institution, does not meet bureaucrats with the ability of sympathy and participation professionally dulled from monotonous service, and not one-sided fanatics who care about observing only state interests, but brothers.

Of the features by which the universal Brotherhood will differ from the state, and the man of an ennobled image from previous psychological formations, I will note here only a few, those that are not difficult to distinguish even from our temporary distance. But many other traits will also appear in time, it is difficult to imagine or predict them now; they will gradually begin to become clear to the eyes and thoughts of only future, more spiritualized generations.

The "Rose of the World" speaks of the possibility of the development of the world according to two scenarios. Both of these scenarios have as their goal universal unification. The main difference between these scenarios are the principles that underlie the future pan-human association - or high ethical principles that rise above the non-ethical nature of the state ( providential plan), or the principles of any of the doctrines, in their lack of spirituality most suitable for the plans of Urparp ( infernal plane).

Consider the proposed development of the first scenario, in accordance with the providential plan, as given in the "Rose of the World":

1) The emergence in one or more European countries of the League of Transformation of the Essence of the State.
The activities of the League are expanding to all countries of the world. As a result of the practical activities of the League to clarify the essence of the state, the process of curbing the Witzraors of metacultures is greatly facilitated for the providential forces of metacultures and thus the aggressive and tyrannical tendencies of states are sharply limited. Already at this stage, the existence of military-political blocs, as well as aggressive intentions at the level of individual states or special services, should become impossible.

2) Formation of League branches in all countries.
Each branch of the League has several aspects: cultural, philanthropic (charitable), educational, political. There is a sharp increase in type 7 states (according to Daniil Andreev's classification):
"A state structure of a softened type, created under the condition of the socio-ethical maturity of the superpeople and the absence of an external threat. The subordination of the state principle directly to the forces of the demiurge. The beginning of the withering away of the principle of violence. The possibility of preparing an ideal national order that opens up before the hierarchies. The position of the Cathedral Soul as the wife of the demiurge." (RM 7.1.55)

3) The political aspect of each branch is transformed structurally and organizationally into National Party of World Religious and Cultural Reform. In the League, all these parties are connected.
Type 8 states are being formed (intermetacultural co-creation of the demiurges). At this stage, there is already only one witzraor who has turned to the Light, and the co-creation of the demiurges can manifest itself in full measure.

4) The work of all national branches of the League in all aspects of their activity should be the impulse that leads society from one stage of international solidarity to the next, through fusion of various regional and religious communities.

5) Holding an international referendum, placing under the ethical control of the League a number of states that have expressed their consent through a referendum, and the formation Federation of States under the ethical control of the League.

6) Holding one or more referendums, until finally the borders of the Federation coincide with the borders of humanity.
Only then do the necessary prerequisites appear for the gradual transformation of humanity by the action of two parallel processes:
- external (political-socio-economic);
- internal (educational-ethical-religious).
From a conglomerate of states to universal Brotherhood. There is a consciously accepted disincarnation of the last of the Witzraors. The poetic image of this possible metahistorical event is presented in the Iron Mystery.

Abolition of the state. The transformation of the state system of mankind into a brotherhood. Realization of the ideal of the Rose of the World in humanity.
It is easy to see that modern events are clearly not developing according to this plan, it has not even begun, and there is not even a hint of the possibility of forming at least somewhere the League for the Transformation of the Essence of the State, or any other organization with similar goals and objectives.

7) Embodiment of the Rose of the World as universal Brotherhood churches.

infernal plane:
1) Urparp's sanction is removed from Zhrugr and his communist Doctrine, as the basis of the concept uniting the world. Urparp's sanction is transferred to Stabing and his concept (cosmopolitanism) as the most soulless and reliable basis for the future unification of the world.

2) Urparp's plans provided for the unification of shrastras without the invasion of igvas and rarugs into other people's shrastras. Only after the "peaceful" collapse of the socialist coalition could the question of the world domination of the cosmopolitan concept be raised.
Without delving into the analysis of metahistorical circumstances, we can state that this goal was achieved in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

3) Since these plans of Urparp were not overthrown and came true, then the question of the world domination of the cosmopolitan concept is on the agenda now. The processes of world unification are in full swing, the task of these processes is the UNSPIRITUAL concept of unification of the world on the basis of cosmopolitanism.

4) The triumph of this concept involves the death of all the Witzraors, with the exception of one - the bearer of this very concept. During the events of 91-2011, the Witzraors of Yugoslavia and the Arab metaculture were destroyed.

5) Urparp's scenario does not provide for the emergence of RM in humanity (i.e., he will do everything to prevent this from happening.) Further development of Urparp's scenario provides for the unification of the world on the basis of cosmopolitanism and, after this, a series of events preparing the transformation of this conglomerate into tyranny . It is then that the question of the transition from lack of spirituality to demonic spirituality and the creation "on the basis of cosmopolitanism of a new seductive, UNIVERSAL doctrine" will be raised.

6) UNIVERSAL teaching has paved the way to worldwide tyranny and the Antichrist himself appears on the scene, becoming the head of the united world.

The current situation confirms the movement exactly according to this scenario and is currently in point 4.

Since humanity remembers itself within the framework of state formations, attempts at globalization have been continuously carried out, that is, attempts to create some kind of universal world state. We will not touch on the time of the Egyptian cosmopolitan pharaohs, we will turn to more recent examples.

No. 1 "The Power of Alexander the Great"(years of life of Alexander the Great 356-323 BC). A native of the Macedonian ruling elite exterminated all potential competitors (including close relatives), subjugated the city-states of Ancient Greece and organized a "campaign of revenge" of the Greek world against the huge Persian kingdom at that time.

As a result of military victories, a huge power was organized on the territory of part of Europe, the Near and Middle East. The ruler died in the capital of Babylon at a fairly early age. There are suspicions of poisoning. Alexander the Great is considered perhaps the first known globalist. He tried to mix peoples and establish uniform orders. Alexandria as a trade and financial center (New York of that time) formed as a result of an attempt at globalization.

No. 2 "Ancient Rome". Beginning - 754 BC. (royal period), ending - the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (476). A fairly well-known story: the growth of coverage areas and the change in the quality of the universal state. The most ancient tsarist period - the republic - the empire - the general crisis of the economy and morality - the collapse. The “world state” of that time, however, the population in comparison with the present in the same territories is extremely small.

The expansion of the Romans in all directions around the Mediterranean was replaced by barbarization, economic and demographic crisis and disintegration under external influence. The empire, while it was strong, established its laws and customs throughout the world.

#3 Arab Caliphate(632 - 1517). Huge territories from the "heart" - the Arabian Peninsula east to Asia, west through the Middle East and North Africa to modern Spain. The states currently professing Islam give an idea of ​​the boundaries of this civilization. The caliphate in Europe was stopped by purely military means. Lost to Europe (at the last historical stage) for technological and political reasons.

Islam unified the population according to religious principle, Islamic law, Islamic traditions and so on. Currently, the process of renaissance of the idea as a geopolitical technology in new historical conditions is taking place. Europe is actively Islamized due to migration and the organization of religious (rather, religious and political) parishes. The process is informally encouraged by local authorities within the previously created multicultural (cosmopolitan) society. Europe repeats the socio-political trajectory of ancient Rome.

No. 4 "Mongolian impulse"(1206 - 1368). In 1294, the vast Mongol Empire split into independent uluses. The "Golden Horde" lasted until 1483. An attempt by the Mongolian military elite to subjugate all peoples to the "will of Heaven". Vast territories from China to the Middle East and Eastern Europe. The state collapsed and was liquidated in the process of degradation of the ruling elite.

A handful of desperate warriors captured the vast territories of Eurasia, which their descendants could not hold on to over time. Universal laws and customs. In particular, “deception of trust” (misrepresentation for selfish purposes) was punishable by death. Gradual Islamization of the elite and intra-family armed disputes. Fragmentation and collapse.

№5 Time of universal Christian monarchies of Europe. The first attempt to create a worldwide Christian state was made back in Ancient Rome, when Christianity was made the dominant religion of the empire (religions can also be perceived as political parties). Ideology - "any power is from God", humility is the best quality, pride is the worst quality.

This is practically a managerial political technology. egocentrism and monotheism. However, Christianity did not prevent the collapse of the western part of the empire. The stable eastern part of the Roman Empire, Byzantium (395-1453), promoted the idea of ​​Orthodoxy as a universal religion as best it could (as far as the strength of the population was sufficient). However, as a result of the influence of a number of factors (constant wars, the economy, the crisis of the elite, the degradation of morality), the state gradually reduced the area of ​​​​its territory until it was finally destroyed.

Since the 15th century, the Christian monarchies of Europe (including the Moscow kingdom with the idea of ​​"Holy Russia") tried to achieve the same, but without success. The year 1918 summed up all the imperial undertakings of continental Europe, because it was not faith that won, but political technologies and money.

#6 Napoleon Bonaparte's Attempt. As a result of the intrigues after the French Revolution (1789-1799), the young ambitious general, using his military genius, tried to create a common European (and world) state with a “French firmware”. In London, this project was categorically not welcomed, so it ended as soon as the human resources of France were completely undermined on the battlefields. Napoleon surrendered to the British, was isolated and died in exile.

#7 "The British Empire on which the sun never sets". Control of the world sea is like control of the world through trade routes. A combination of diplomacy, war and economics. Metropolis and colonies, the pound as the world's trading currency.

The project was gradually closed due to the organization of the US Federal Reserve in 1913 (including with the participation of bankers from England). At present, Great Britain (what is left of it) is being pushed into the European Union as a territory of supranational control, dependent on the United States. Not everyone in Britain likes it, but no more. The metropolis and the colony were in fact swapped.

#8 The Soviet Union and the "Third Reich of the German Nation". Both states pursued globalization in their own way, and in 1942 the collapse of Germany was not absolutely a foregone conclusion. Due to the blood of "subhuman Slavs" and other military-political and economic aspects, London and New York have retained their leading positions in the world.

The Germans with their "Aryanism" were completely compromised. The fact of the military defeat of Germany and Japan created the UN as a "modernized" League of Nations on the terms of the banking families that controlled the US, Britain, France and had interests in the "Chinese world". In 1948, the state of Israel was created by the hands of Stalin and Western conceptualists, and as a result, globalism no longer needed the Soviet Union. The British Empire has ceased to be needed in its former capacity. The collapse of European colonial empires and the Soviet Union confirmed this.

No. 9 "The United States of America as a universal benchmark". Until the beginning of the 20th century, it was a utopian country that was built by banking capital with the hands of European emigrants. Since 1913 (the creation of the FRS), world finances have begun to formalize the world state of the provinces. Something similar to the Roman Empire with a different technological structure and a significantly increased population. The power center in Washington, the financial center in London and New York, the religious center in Jerusalem.

At this stage, under the pretext of a crisis, an attempt is being made to modernize the existing "world state", to transfer human society to a new quality. Thus, as long as a person remembers himself in state forms, these forms have always sought to increase the coverage of territories, that is, they have carried out globalization on their own basis. Competition intervened. The main question is the place of this or that people in this historical process.

Actually, all modern conflicts and find out in what capacity certain territories will be presented further. Metropolises and colonies, consumers and donors, administrators and outside controlled. For the rights and opportunities of the territories, for the status of influential families, there is only competition now, even in conditions of formal consensus.

Many great undertakings and imperial peoples have long since come to naught, others, as they say, are surviving. The main modern geopolitical trends: the Iranian and Chinese issue (the quality of these territories in a world state), the settlement of Europe with new residents, the prospective integrity or collapse of the Russian Federation. Note that after the collapse of the USSR, Russia is used by the world state exclusively as a territory - a donor. Ideologically and economically dependent territory will completely repeat European trends with a step of one generation (biblical 40 years). That is, for the Russian population, 2018 is approximately the same as in Europe once 1978.

AN NA
NE WS Join us on our channel!

2 comments:

    05.08.2018

    A lot has been said, but... In view of the non-naming of the cause, purpose, driving forces (more precisely, the driving force), much remains unnamed, including the essential, and the named appears in the form of some kind of random mess. (From the little things: well, for example, the Turkic Empire was not named, the important remnants for our country were the Khazar Khaganate, the Volga Tatars, the Ottoman Empire, Turkey. China also sought to subjugate everything around it, and not without success: Japan, Korea, Vietnam , for example, they used, and in some places still use Chinese characters and principles, and China itself was not at all so homogeneous before. different: the mechanism of undermining was originally laid in the USSR (“sovereign union republics”; the same, but in a weaker form, the mechanism exists in the USA - if management gets out of control there, they will begin “perestroika”; would you please try to explain why and by whom was this mine planted?); and Germany was united (which means that the authors were slightly different). It is not even mentioned that Byzantium with its “orthodoxy” (not “Orthodoxy”!) was destroyed by the “good Christians” of the Latin Christian Church; Turks only plentiful; and not at all "internal contradictions", etc. And the Maya, the Aztecs, the Incas…) This point of view on “geopolitics”, as if everything happens “naturally” and “spontaneously” in it, is similar to the theory of the emergence of life from the “primordial soup” - which, it seems, everyone has already abandoned. “Globalization” is indeed in our nature, like the desire to create a “unified field theory” in physics. At least within the bounds of our observable space.
    According to legend, humanity was already one in the beginning, with a single language; only the machinations of the "Prince of this world" divided him. And the reunification of mankind would be a very positive thing. However, seeing the inevitability of such a reunion, the Evil Prince led it in order to pervert and put it at his service. (It must be borne in mind that all these are "metaphors" that can be interpreted quite "realistically".)
    The milestone event in the history of "globalization" was indeed the activity of Alexander Filippovich. And not only because he defeated the Persians and reached their sphere of influence in India. These conquests of his were purely "symbolic", he could not keep and administer them. But the main thing is that the post-Alexander "Hellenistic" "Ptolemaic" states gave rise to modern Judaism. Before Alexandro-Hellenism there was no such Judaism!
    Alexander was a student of Aristotle (Aristotle was his home teacher), Aristotle was a student of Plato (a boxer like Klitschko). Plato, as it were, created a “philosophy of unity” and an absurd theory of ideas as separate entities (for example, the idea of ​​yellow allegedly exists separately from yellow objects in a certain realm of “pure ideas”).
    In the era of Alexandro-Hellenism, Aristotle and Plato (philosophers not so famous during their lifetime; Democritus, for example, had much greater fame) were raised to the shield, and not only because Aristotle was the teacher of the hegemon, but, most importantly, adherents of the dark the cult of Jehovah-Adonai (Prince of this world), based in Babylon (as the only real city of those times), and then in "New York" - Alexandria. It was in Alexandria, in the 2nd - 1st c. "BC." The Jewish Bible, the Tanakh, was written. Before that, there was no Bible!
    The official ideology in Alexandria was Neoplatonism, a slightly corrected and supplemented teaching of Plato. The Jews (Iamblichus and others) took an active part in the formation of Neoplatonism. Before the Alexandrian Jewish sages combined their dark cult with Platonism, Judaism was not at all monotheistic. It would never have occurred to anyone to attribute to Jehovah: a) uniqueness (there are no other gods); b) omnipotence and, in particular, the creation of everything; c) omniscience; d) "all-goodness" (whatever he does, everything is fine). All these properties passed to Jehovah from Platonism. Properties such are contrary to logic; but Platonism, the heir of the Sophists, was not troubled by this. (Just like the modern Plato - Klitschko is not embarrassed by the contradiction: “Not everyone can look into the future. Or rather, not only everyone can look ...”)
    A well-developed worldview is a great and terrible force! (We saw this in the example of Marxism.) Judaism, starting from the Alexandrian era, first went through "intrauterine development." Less than 200 years after the formation of Judaism, it gave rise to Christianity, which already possessed all the necessary qualities for the conquest of the globe by the Jews.
    If the theory of Judaism was written by scholars who know the tradition, Christian scriptures by "fishermen", then the next son of Judaism, "Islam", represents the greatest degradation of the intellect, presenting no reasonable criteria for judgment. (Perhaps the "Islamization" of Europe is precisely intended to sow complete chaos in the minds of the slaves, the Slavs.)
    The role of Judaism, or rather proto-Judaism, pre-Alexandria Judaism, has not actually been studied. But here is a revealing fact: Catholic missionaries were surprised to find in the Chinese city of Kaifeng in the bend of the Yellow River, in the place where the “silk road” to the Middle East began and where they find the oldest “artifacts” of Chinese civilization, they discovered there the Jewish community that existed there from time immemorial (the Kaifeng Jews were yellow and cross-eyed and also revered Confucius). The missionaries found Torah scrolls in their synagogue. And two sisters from this community - one became the wife of Chiang Kai-shek, the other - Mao Zedong.
    Conclusion: "globalization" is different. "Our" globalization is good, "theirs", i.e. directed by the devil is bad.

If we look at the historical facts, we will see two series of opposite phenomena that excite these two opposite evaluations of the idea of ​​a world state.

In the human spirit there is an unstoppable desire for all-humanity and universality. But at the same time, we see that the nations that create states instill in them various the basic ideas of power, each of which has the character of universality, and therefore they cannot merge organically. On the contrary, as development progresses, they are more and more opposed to each other. In any union of people, as a result of the combined action of many individuals, some middle lines of further development are formed, which acquire an organic character, that is, an internal tendency to develop the existing type of joint existence, according to its internal logic, to the last conclusions.

At the same time, the higher the development of various national-state types, the less able they are to move from one to another. We constantly observe in history that nations and states, once firmly embarking on one or another path of development, are already, as it were, incapable of changing it. Their past determines the future. They are able to act only in those ways that are laid down in their past. Quibus mediis fundantur, iisdem retinentur - says the old rule of empirical politics. A new type sometimes appears, but only at the cost of the death of the former state. And we constantly see several such different, stable, incapable of merging types of state, simultaneously existing in the world.

But with such stubborn stability of individual non-merging types of nationalities and states, unable to retreat from their individuality and sovereignty, nevertheless, in humanity * Undoubtedly, the association is developing and strengthening.

* I'm not talking about humanity in the sense of a fantastic "collective personality" - Etre Supreme l "Humanite, - in which an unbelieving thought created a surrogate for a deity for itself. Neither "humanity", nor a nation, nor a state constitute a "personality." The only real person is himself "man". Mankind does not exist in this sense, since it is an abstract concept, and not an "object". But the human race as a collection of individuals exists. It is not a "political reality" only because it has not formed into one common union. And such a connection is logically conceivable if people found a common principle of power on which they could unite.

The human race did not hitherto constitute a single union. But some interaction between these hundreds of millions of disparate personalities has always existed, so that even the "history of mankind" appears to our mind. People in their earthly existence, even without knowing each other, go to some common goal, due to the unity of their psychological and material nature.

The idea of ​​"world history", which has some general providential meaning and purpose for all mankind, is by its origin a religious idea, and even "God-revealed". It was brought into the world by Israel, the Jewish people, and it is closely connected with the idea of ​​man's connection with the Divine. In Christianity, "world history", the history of the entire human race, became even more clear, and in the prophetic visions of the Old Testament mystics and in the Apocalypse it even presented a general picture of the existence of mankind from its creation to the end of the world. Of course, the unity of mankind in the common destinies of the world is not a state unity. But nevertheless, the very fact of the unity of the nature of individuals who, as people, as children of the Heavenly Father, are incomparably closer to each other than as members of political unions - this unity brings each person psychologically closer to all of humanity more than to his own state. It is brought together with the state by common power, common interests, joint activities with citizens. With humanity, it is the very nature of the individual. This is such a powerful fact of psychology that once revealed to people by religion, it has already remained indestructible for consciousness even with the loss of religion.

In the course of historical life, this psychological closeness of man to all other people has made tremendous progress. But it must not be forgotten that all your social associations are fundamentally psychological phenomena. Consequently, the growing awareness of the closeness of people to each other can also lead to the unity of an external union. In addition to this internal psychological fact that develops in history, actual relations between all parts of the human race develop in it.

History is a process of bringing peoples closer together. At first they sting, not even knowing about the mutual existence. Now they all know each other. They had never before had any intercourse outside the circle of immediate neighbors. Now constantly the closest ties cover the entire globe. Previously, people considered strangers as enemies, barbarians, "Germans" (non-speaking). Now, in the man of all tribes, the same inner dignity is generally recognized, and contempt for other peoples has been extremely reduced. The idea of ​​universal brotherhood is spread by Christianity even among non-Christians. The commonality of science has become a fact in all parts of the world. In the same way, material ties are expanding between the most diverse peoples not by the day, but by the hour. In short, the actual rapprochement of peoples during the course of history has made tremendous progress, and in this respect the pre-Christian world and the Christian world differ beyond recognition. External means - mental, moral and material for the unification of all peoples in certain allied relations have developed to the extreme. The general trend of these facts, of course, enhances the possibility of uniting people in one world state.

But it is impossible to draw a conclusion from this about the emergence of a world state. All this rapprochement of various tribes, states and countries of the world creates a certain cultural unity in human life. This does not yet mean state unity.

Spiritual, mental, industrial unity - all these are forms free communication of people. But social and especially state phenomena are unthinkable without general power.

World state: utopia or probable future?

"World state: utopia or probable future?"

The question of whether the existence of a world state is possible has worried the minds of people for more than one century. The beginnings of this theory appeared in antiquity, so it, like history, passes from generation to generation. Opinions, both before and now, are divided into two opposing camps: one side believes that the construction of a world state is a utopia, and the other that it is an inevitable phenomenon of the evolution of mankind. Each point of view is not accidental, because there are a number of reasons that can reasonably prove whether the unification of people in one state is a utopia or an inevitable future.

Some scientists believe that the processes taking place in modern society have strengthened the mood of the supporters of the theory of the world state, for whom it has become a kind of program for the development of society. This is explained by the fact that the need to build a global state is dictated by the needs of mankind, many real forces can contribute to its creation or, on the contrary, slow down this process, and there are also a number of principles on which it will be based. One of the main ones will be a single world religion, but it should be more simplified, generalized and accessible for understanding a wide range of people who are completely different in their origin, and, most importantly, in their worldview. Through this religion, human thoughts and motives can be turned away from their own ego, directed towards the achievement of universal human unity and power. A single state is obliged to provide all segments of the population with education of a quality and scale that surpasses all previous experience. The process of education, in accordance with the needs, will continue throughout life, this will contribute to the fact that the inhabitants of this state will engage in self-education. Extensive employment opportunities in obtaining a certain profession will help to avoid unemployment, in the ideal sense, each person will be involved in the field of activity that is closest and most interesting to him, which means that he will make a greater contribution to the development and functioning of the state and society. Such an outcome of events will contribute to a favorable economic organization of the state, based on the equal distribution of all natural resources, production will be more aimed at general consumption, and not profit. state global humanity

It will be possible to speak about the beginning of a new historical era. Also, the main principle will be to reduce the consumption of all natural resources associated with the military-industrial complex, because even the very concept of "defense" will become meaningless. There will be no wars, which means there will be no reason to create weapons, an army and other elements of defense.

There will be a significant increase in the standard of human life, it will be possible to release a huge potential of talents and opportunities that were previously stifled by social injustice. The world state will allow the destruction of stupefying, hard physical labor by creating various robots, but this does not mean that people will completely stop working, they will work freely, meaningfully and actively.

It is impossible to ignore the environmental problems that are particularly relevant in modern society. The creation of a world state would mark the beginning of a more effective solution to this problem, since it would be in the interests of people to save the entire planet, and not just a separate territory of their state. The protection of animals and endangered species would take on a new meaning, because this would become a problem for the whole world. The economic equality of people would help save the lives of animals from poachers who kill them for their own benefit and the accumulation of wealth.

Of course, the creation of a world state will entail changes in the field of justice, because the existing judicial system will be unusable. Young people will have to be prepared for the activities of this plan from the school bench, this is necessary for the development of insight, understanding of the ailments of the human soul. Such a detailed study will enable an extremely cautious approach to the defendant, and for judges - the issuance of a more objective verdict. The role of such judicial workers is very great. Most likely, prisons as a form of punishment will no longer be so relevant, because the main form of punishment will be correction by labor and psychological assistance to convicts. It is possible to create specialized institutions, the main function of which will be the correction of the offender.

As for state administration, this system will include the training of personnel who can be true professionals in their field, as well as those who have a high degree of interest in the prosperity and smooth functioning of the state.

But, unfortunately, no matter how ideal the idea of ​​a world state is, no matter how many prospects for the development of mankind it carries, I believe that the construction of this form of organization of people's lives in the foreseeable future is a utopia.

I see the root cause of the doubtfulness of this theory in its illusory nature and inconsistency with modern world trends and the realities of life. For example, in the more than fifty years that have passed since even detailed plans for the construction of this world structure began to appear, nothing has changed in the system of international law. Nothing happened that could indicate, if not the beginning of the construction of what was planned, then at least the formation of the prerequisites for the further evolution of the idea.

In connection with these conditions, it should be noted that the idea of ​​building a world state is similar to the same majestic and, as the experience of a number of countries has shown, illusory idea of ​​building communism. Both ideas carry the goal of making all of humanity happy, but this is even theoretically impossible to implement.

In order to understand and more objectively evaluate the theory of the world state, and at the same time the theories of the world government, the citizen of the world and others related to it, it is necessary to pay attention to its political, social and economic, as well as historical origins. This means that not a single theory claiming recognition and long-term existence arises from scratch. Speaking about the theory of the world state, it should be noted that it is closely connected with cosmopolitanism. In a certain period of time, some ideas of cosmopolitanism were transformed into the ideas of world law and world state. However, what's the point? After all, the possibility of the existence of a world state in a contradictory world, consisting of a huge number of peoples, nations, states interconnected and interacting with each other, is extremely small. The main problem is that this theory does not take into account the existing realities of modern society, as well as the contradictions that stand in the way of building a world state.

When developing this theory and making claims for its viability, a number of factors were not properly taken into account.

And the first of these factors will be a rather contradictory perception of the idea of ​​world unification by various sections of various national societies. This is not so much about the presence of interethnic, class or other contradictions that traditionally exist in every society, but about a different kind of contradictions, born of incompatibility of interests and views on the world around us and the prospects for its further development between narrower groups of people. For example, supporters of cosmopolitanism and patriots of their homeland and people, respectively, between supporters of building a world state and its opponents.

The second factor is the contradictions that exist between religious denominations, cultural and everyday ways of different nationalities, which often transform into open confrontation and which do not at all contribute to the formation of some kind of human association, and further creation of a world state on the basis of it. In addition to the problems generated by the cultural orientation of individuals and entire nationalities, there are problems that generally call into question the idea of ​​creating such a state, or at least create huge obstacles to its implementation. Under these problems it is necessary to understand the elusive compatibility of such civilizations and their representatives as Eastern and Western culture, as the Muslim and Christian worldview and worldview, as the left-wing and right-wing radical ideology, and others. There is also the problem of the incompatibility of Western civilization and Russian civilization, which is justified by the peculiarity of the development of Western countries and Russia.

The third factor is interstate conflicts that have arisen since the formation of the first states on Earth and in certain periods, escalating to extremes. These circumstances do not create a favorable environment for the formation of a world state. This refers not only to the contradictions between developed and undeveloped countries, but also only between highly developed states that set the pace for the life of the whole world. Basically, the struggle between countries takes place in the economic, technological and financial spheres. The enormous moral and material damage caused by the First and Second World Wars, it would seem, has not been ignored and should contribute to a conflict-free, world state, but in reality everything is not so perfect: the sad experience of losses and destruction is repeated many times.

Also, the negative aspect of this theory lies in the fact that, being created in the interests of the transnational oligarchy and the countries dominant in the modern world, as G.I. Tunkin: "Disorients peoples, both in domestic and international law", "distracts attention from the pressing problems of improving international relations and organizations as tools for ensuring peace and developing international cooperation"

Thus, I believe that the creation of a world state, at least in the foreseeable future, is an unattainable phenomenon. This is explained by a number of reasons due to the peculiarities of the modern world community. Firstly, this is a confrontation between various religious movements that will never be able to come to a common compromise. Secondly, conflicts based on national grounds, when one nation exalts itself above others. Thirdly, it is the desire of some, stronger and more developed states to manage others, to control all their activities. And, finally, a different attitude to the very theory of the world state.