Victims of hazing in the Russian army (13 photos). Hazing in the army. Informal relations between military personnel Is there hazing in military universities now

Hazing in the army in 2016 - myth or reality? Hazing and hazing in the army. What it is? And are these concepts different from each other? Or, on the contrary, hazing and non-Ustavshchina in the army are about the same thing?

Let's dot the i in this article in the analysis of each of these concepts. And, most importantly, we will answer the question, is there hazing in the army in 2016?

To begin, as always, I want to analyze the basic concepts. I am sure that in this way I will be able to clarify the meaning of hazing and hazing. And here everything is not so simple ...

Hazing and hazing

Friends, you won't believe it. But I just looked at the omniscient Wikipedia and realized that the concept of hazing is described there not quite correctly. Wikipedia is wrong. Now I have seen everything in life.

Let me explain my words with concrete evidence. Here is the definition of hazing from.

"Dedovshchina" (an analogue in the Navy - "godkovshchina") - an unofficial hierarchical system of relations between military personnel of the lower army level (soldiers, corporals, sergeants) that has developed in the Armed Forces, based on their ranking, "sorting" on the basis of the magnitude of the actual service life of each specific individual and related discrimination, one of the varieties of hazing relationships. It has a semi-criminal character and usually manifests itself in the form of exploitation, psychological and physical violence.

Nevertheless, there is some truth in this definition. I agree with the definition right up to the words "... and related discrimination". Because further - substitution of concepts.

The stereotype has already firmly settled in our heads that hazing in the army is hell. Scuffles, grandfathers beating spirits with chairs at night and all such horror.

I want to say that it is not true. And I want to explain the true meaning of this concept, which I met only thanks to my service in the Training Battalion of the VA MTO.

I will not come up with a lot of smart words. I'll be brief and as simple as possible.

Hazing in the army is a learning process proper service soldier of young replenishment (last call) old-timers (). As of 2015 - soldiers of the previous draft, since the service life is now only 1 year.

What is hazing in specific examples? These are extraordinary drill exercises conducted by old-timers, because at first no one can walk in the ranks, a visual explanation of the new rules for addressing comrades and officers, the development of military discipline among the newly called-up personnel.

More than a dozen such examples can be cited. The meaning remains the same. Hazing is a process of helping the speedy adaptation of a newly arrived soldier under the supervision of one or more old-timers. First of all, a junior sergeant, who is appointed deputy platoon commander.

In fact, it turns out like this. You are drafted into the army, you come there. And at the time of your arrival, there were still N people of the previous conscription, that is, old-timers, in the unit. It is they who will be engaged in your training in the basics of military service.

Without fights, humiliations and public insults.

hazing is good and useful tradition, and not the scuffle that can be seen in thousands of YouTube videos when querying "hazing in the army 2015".

We had it. We were taught that way. And we will continue this tradition in our battalion. Because in our part the Charter is loved and honored. Now let's talk about those who don't.

It's hard to argue with Wikipedia here. The definition is short and precise.

Hazing in the Armed Forces is a relationship between military personnel that grossly violates the requirements of the charters and, as a rule, is a violation of the law.

I agree 100%. Non-Ustavshchina are the very scuffles, humiliations and mass fights that are also present in our army.

I will not be able to answer for all the military units of Russia, of course. But trust me. Over the past six months, I have talked with many servicemen from different parts of our vast Motherland.

And that's what I can say with 100% certainty. There is hazing in the ranks of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. In many parts, unfortunately.

I can say for sure that we do not have them. Any attempts not only to fight, but also to think about it are nipped in the bud.

Since my service, they began to stuff us with stories about how especially impudent cadets and soldiers fought among themselves, or even simply pushed a comrade, after which the latter fell and cut his eyebrow.

Broken eyebrow and all! You see, what a trifle compared to what happens in other parts? And what is the outcome of the story? The culprit was sent to a disciplinary battalion for 2 years.

After his return, he will serve his term in the army. That is, first 2 years in the disbat, and then serve in the army. Normally pushed, right? Now imagine what thoughts reign in this guy’s head right now, given that he still serves in the disbat? Do you think he regretted what he did?

I think yes. But now it's not about him.

I recently spoke with several of my friends who are also serving in the military now. In their parts there are hazing relationships and are developed quite strongly. Suffice it to say that my question to one of them: “How many times have you fought?” I got the answer: "Lost count."

And I heard similar words from more than one person. Well ... Friends, I will not stretch my opinion about hazing in the army for the entire next half of the article. You will find out at the very end.

My task in this article is to show difference between the concepts of hazing and non-Ustavshchina and, in a sense, restore justice.

So let's sum up and summarize.

Results

1. The concepts of "hazing" and "hazing" - Different things.
2. You can not call "hazing" - a type of hazing. Hazing is a good old tradition. And she never had any assault and things like that.
3. Both hazing and hazing present in the Russian army.
4. I want to note once again: there is hazing in my unit, but there are no hazing.
5. There are people who consider hazing as an integral part of the modern service. There are those who strongly disagree with them. We live in a free country and we are entitled to our opinion.

P.S. Dear blog readers. I sincerely hope that I managed to convey to you the main idea for which I wrote this article. In a nutshell, it can be expressed as follows:

Hazing is good. Inappropriate relationships are bad. The Russian army has both the first and the second.

Whatever your attitude to these two features of army life, I ask you for help.

As I said at the beginning of the article, I was seized by a crazy thought before writing it: to restore justice and return the concept of "hazing" to its true meaning in the minds of our citizens.

I ask you to convey my words or the text of this article to as many people around us as possible. Personal recommendations / repost / sending an article with a link in a personal message or publication in your own public. I will be glad to any support.

Thanks in advance to everyone involved in this great cause!

It is impossible not to notice that recently the confidence of the population in the Russian army has increased so much that the military craft has regained the status of a priority privileged occupation, and military service is gradually turning into a school of life, as it was called in the once existing union. As soon as the state took a course towards modernization and re-equipment, cardinal changes were not long in coming.

However, the deplorable state of the armed forces of the 1990s will remain in the memory of many people for a long time to come. Even some combat officers today wonder how Russia managed to maintain its integrity in such difficult times. The defense capability left much to be desired, but it was not even a matter of technical equipment. The motivation of citizens to military service was practically reduced to zero.

Why young people do not want to serve in the army

One of the reasons for this situation was hazing in the Russian army of the nineties. The opinion poll showed that the vast majority of young men are afraid of military service not because of the difficult military life, but because of hazing. Fears were reinforced by feature films, video materials, chronicles and stories of experienced people about the hard life of the young replenishment of soldiers.

Is it worth recalling specific cases when a young man was injured or everything ended in death? To this gloomy list it is necessary to add wholesale desertion, executions of colleagues, suicide.

In 1998, the first human rights organization for conscripts was created, which is called the Committee of Soldiers' Mothers. We can say that this was a desperate step aimed at combating hazing, since it was this manifestation in the army that was named as the main reason for the above acts.

Positive or negative social phenomenon

In order to talk sensibly on the topic of hazing, you need to set yourself up for the fact that this issue is quite multifaceted, and when one truth is established, even more disputes arise. The first paradox is that they have been trying to eradicate this manifestation for many decades, but most of the men of the older generation, at the mention of a kind of hierarchy in the army, will only smile thoughtfully. Moreover, they often note that it is thanks to the upbringing by the "grandfathers" that the "spirit" becomes a real soldier.

What is this contradiction? Undoubtedly, in families that have suffered from the consequences of hazing, they will repeat about the complete eradication of this remnant of society, and former military personnel whose fate did not suffer a tragedy believe that everyone must go through such trials. The reason for the disagreement lies in the ambiguous understanding of hazing, as such.

Find out: Summer and winter uniforms of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation

On the one hand, it is represented by a strict school, which is arranged by old-timers for young recruits. What's bad about it? Of course, the form of education is peculiar, but as a result, the recruit becomes independent, learns to serve, first of all, himself, observe subordination, live in a team, follow orders, and march correctly.

On the other hand, educational measures sometimes cross not only conceivable boundaries, but also the framework of legality. There are hazing, lawlessness, which is interpreted as a crime against the person. They are expressed by public humiliation, beatings, and other terrible deeds. Thus, with all the negativity, hazing will be remembered with good irony by a decent share of storekeepers, but we will still talk about the dire consequences of this phenomenon.

When did

The next paradox arises when trying to determine the time when hazing appeared in the army. According to the stories of real witnesses, even before the 50s, such a concept was not even discussed. The origin of the hierarchy took place during the thaw period, when many prisoners were amnestied, for whom military duty was provided.

As a result of such reforms, part of the “Zon concepts” migrated to the armed forces. But the reasons for the emergence of hazing should be discussed separately, and in this respect it should be noted that hazing in the Soviet army of the 50-60s became the basis of modern battles.

And in this matter it was not without the ubiquitous "BUT". Some documents, including works of art, indicate a peculiar attitude of old-timers towards new recruits back in tsarist times. And this is not surprising, since military service was calculated for dozens of years, so experienced servicemen could not help claiming certain concessions with all the consequences.

Reasons for the formation of hazing

We agreed that such a phenomenon as hazing has a complex structure. It manifests itself as a set of certain rites, sometimes causing the laughter of the recruits themselves and can have significant varieties, reaching illegal acts. We will consider this social phenomenon in a negative plane and try to determine where the reasons for the emergence of hazing in the USSR lie.

Find out: What is the combat charter of the armed forces of the Russian Federation

After the demobilization of all the military - participants in the Second World War, volleys of shells of real hostilities in human memory began to gradually subside. Already in 10-20 years it was possible to talk about peace and a cloudless sky. Oddly enough, but it was this fact that brought the destruction of the former solidarity into society. If a common misfortune unites, then the absence of external conflicts gives rise to internal ones. The army, on the other hand, was a kind of “mirror” of the state of society, and taking into account the fact that criminal elements fell into the structure of the troops, the Armed Forces began to gradually replenish with hazing.

The next vector could be the destruction of the Stalinist foundations. By the beginning of the 60s, the government elites, having escaped from fear of punishment, turned from creators into consumers, which was reflected in the leadership of the army. Freethinking led to the degradation of the commanding staff. This does not mean that the General Staff was replenished with incompetent commanders, but low ranks firmly settled in the field, whose responsibility was reduced to zero. The connivance of the officers did not become the reason, but was the catalyst for the appearance of general hazing.

The thaw of the 1960s was remembered by all the negative attitude towards denunciations and informing. From the political background, these terms migrated to the army. At that time, a report of infliction of bodily harm was considered as a snitch. And if the state stopped such manifestations, then what could be said within the military unit. Gradually hazing in the army began to include fights and beatings, which were silent on both sides of the conflict.

The urbanization of society and the conflict of generations usually stand in the same row, since the motive is the same. Just as the old-timers could not accept the foundations of newly arrived soldiers, the city dwellers placed themselves above the villagers, both in terms of social and mental development. On a regional scale, the periphery constantly clashed with Muscovites.

What do we have today

Returning to the question of whether there is hazing in the army at the present time, we will begin to cover the period from the end of the 90s. Attempts to stop this phenomenon have been made repeatedly. The top leadership finally began to understand that if the manifestation of non-Ustavism is not eliminated, then problems with the contingent will arise in every draft campaign. It should be noted that all attempts were in vain, since the phenomenon, like a virus, hit the armed forces at all levels.

Find out: Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces

Among all the proposals on how to deal with hazing, quite realizable ones were put forward, but crumbled about the cruel reality of the deplorable state of the army.

• To occupy the soldiers, especially the old-timers, so that they simply do not have time to torture the young replenishment. For implementation, officer cadres were required, which were not available.
• Increase the number of officers. This proposal required significant financial outlays. For the budget of that time, the task was considered overwhelming.
• Introduction of regulatory bodies (independent). Such an approach is fraught with the simulation of the military personnel themselves in order to sabotage military orders.
• Transfer of the army to a voluntary basis. The geopolitical situation does not allow such steps to be taken. The territory of Russia is large enough, so there is a risk of not getting enough troops.
• Tightening responsibility for the manifestation of hazing on officers. There were banal cases of revenge, when, thanks to his own authority, an officer gave orders that humiliated a soldier. Everything happened in accordance with the charter, so hazing smoothly transposed into "Ustavshchina", which practically did not change the essence.

Today I will tell you if there is hazing in the army. Before answering this question, I will explain what is hazing in the army, and what is hazing.

Hazing in the army- this is the process of training by old-timers (military personnel of an earlier conscription period) or, in other words, by the "grandfathers" of the young replenishment. And hazing in the army is the relationship between soldiers who grossly violate the requirements of the regulations and are usually a violation of the law with all the ensuing consequences.

Hazing in the army today - myth or reality?

As you understand, hazing in the army and hazing in the army are completely different things. Hazing is when young recruits arrive, and “grandfathers” or the so-called “demobilization”, military personnel of an older conscription begin to teach them, for example, how to walk correctly, talk correctly, address senior military ranks, etc. That is, there is a smooth formation of a serviceman and, in fact, from this.

Hazing in the army and hazing in the army

Hazing in the army has nothing to do with what you can see, for example, on YouTube by entering in the search films about hazing in the army. All you see there is hazing in the army.

When you join the army, you are, accordingly, a recruit. You meet half-year-olds - these are the same soldiers, but they have already served half a year, the so-called "elephants". In the general sense, hazing is when a so-called old-timer begins to humiliate a young soldier physically or morally.

Useful information for conscripts:

• How many days, hours, minutes are left before your demobilization.

But, fortunately, today this problem in the army is generally reduced to nothing. Therefore, if mothers or young people who are just going to the army read me, remember: there is no hazing in the army!

Now the difference between the grandfathers and the new replenishment is only six months. Hazing in the army appears because servicemen in the army live in a male team and, of course, they may have disagreements. These disagreements appear for completely different reasons, even for everyday ones. So do not think that the whole army is built on the fact that grandfathers show their superiority over young soldiers.

Many people think that this is what hazing looks like in the army. But it's not!

In the general sense, hazing is when an old-timer beats a young soldier (the so-called "spirit"). Of course, a lot depends on people, and in every military team there are such “rotten” soldiers who begin to tell what kind of “grandfather” he is and how long he served.

But in fact, with the current service life, what kind of “grandfather” can he be? He served 4-5 months more than a young soldier. But still, mostly more or less adequate young people serve in the army, for whom honor and decency are not empty words, and, accordingly, they do not behave like that.

Young people, now I am speaking to you, remember, whatever the situation, always keep your head in a cold mind. Do not let your emotions get the best of you, because this momentary weakness of yours (the desire to hit someone) can lead to irreversible consequences.

Consider the moment that military people, in particular conscript soldiers, and all their deeds are multiplied by three. If in civilian life you hit someone in the face, and even if he writes a statement against you to the police, then you will receive a maximum administrative punishment.

In the army, all this is multiplied by three, if you hit a soldier, and he wrote a report on you, then you will be 100% sent to the so-called "diesel" - a disciplinary battalion (disbat), where you can serve a year, one and a half or maximum two years. And this minute momentary weakness can lead to such disastrous consequences.

Therefore, it is better to send such an opponent to three Russian letters than to bite your elbows later. Summing up, I would like to say once again: there is no hazing as such. There are conflicts at the everyday level and not quite adequate soldiers from the senior draft, who think that they are mega cool soldiers.

Also, what I wanted to say in this article: in the army there is hazing and hazing. Only hazing is a good concept, the process of training young recruits, hazing in the army is any situation that violates military regulations or laws and can lead to bad consequences.

So, about "hazing" in the army. Probably, we must first determine what EXACTLY is hidden behind this term: "hazing"? The politically correct name "hazing" in my opinion, only confuses the issue! My opinion is this: if (God forbid!) the army tries to act STRICTLY according to the letter of the regulations, it will not only be demoralized, as it is now, but COMPLETELY paralyzed: any relations between soldiers and between soldiers and officers will simply become impossible! Imagine for a moment that EVERYTHING and ALWAYS in the army approach each other with a marching step! They salute each other, address only by rank ...

No, who argues when it comes to SERVICE business, it happens, it should be so, but not in constant and everyday life! Only robots are able to communicate with each other like that! We, in the years 75-77, punished the "Ustavshchina" STOCKERS. EVERYONE WERE ADDRESSING TO THEM STRICTLY ACCORDING TO THE REGULATIONS, and all the sergeants demanded the same from THEM. It acted more cruelly than physical reprisal - reports were filed on transfers to other units, there were even attempts at suicide, although there was no BURNING: just LITERAL COMPLIANCE WITH THE CHARTER! But this is one side of the coin! I want to talk a little about something else: about whether an army is possible in PRINCIPLE without one form or another of "hazing", and which "hazing" benefits the army, and which one brings unacceptable harm and is subject to steady eradication. Let's try to figure it out!

In my opinion, it is absolutely not important for THIS question whether the army is recruited on a professional basis, on the basis of conscription, or on a mixed basis, when both contract soldiers and Citizens called up for a certain period serve. One way or another, people come to the service who are absolutely not mentally prepared for the most important thing, which is the meaning of the existence of any army ... If we discard all the beautiful words and look at the very essence, then the task of the army is ... what? Defense of the fatherland? - Right! But what is it? - warfare! War, that is! And in peacetime, the ARMY MUST be ready for war! And in the war, they kill ... And they kill first of all the soldiers (and officers, of course, too). If someone says that the defense of the fatherland is not connected with the KILLING of enemies, then I will not believe him! There were no bloodless wars yet! So, people come to the army for whom the murder of a person is absolutely unacceptable! It contradicts the inner attitudes of a normal person! Moreover, murder is not in a state of passion, not after an insult, not in the struggle for one's life, no! often this is a murder on the orders of someone who has not done anything wrong to you personally! And whether it is so important how the murder is carried out, whether by pressing the trigger of the machine gun, by throwing a grenade, or by pressing the "start" button on the remote control, all the same, the result of the combat use of the army is murder, call it at least a rebuff to the aggressor, at least the protection of sacred lines, at least upholding "Democracy" - blood is blood! I will not resonate, and pretend that everything is one, no! But one way or another, a soldier must be mentally prepared to KILL! And the task of psychological training at the initial stage of the service MUST solve this problem! Otherwise, the price of such an Army is worthless, it is only suitable for parades ...

But the raw material, so to speak, for future soldiers, is completely unprepared to kill! How to achieve this? From the time of the most ancient armies of the world, from the time of Ancient Egypt and China, Assyria and Babylon, the recipe was simple: A winepress! Constant psychological pressure from the very first day of service! They pressed the young in the Macedonian phalanxes, and in the Roman cohorts and in the Slavic rats - always! In most modern armies of the world, this pressure is assigned to junior commanders - sergeants and corporals. For the first time, they constantly put pressure on young recruits, breaking stereotypes that have been established since civilian life! Yes, they cause hatred of subordinates, and when he is ready to KILL his sergeant, it's done! The civilian was left in the past, sroldat was born! As a rule, at this moment the attitude towards young people changes DRAFTLY, they BECAME THEIR OWN in the army! and there is no need to drive them further!

But in the Soviet, and later in the Russian army, unfortunately, the importance of the sergeant corps was sharply downplayed! (It was downplayed). It's one thing when 18-19-year-old boys are chased by a 25-28-year-old sergeant, another thing is when the sergeant is six months older, or even the same age! This is how hazing appeared in the SA ... As usual, especially when the selection bar for the troops fell below the plinth, and people with an already distorted psyche began to get into the army, this hazing began to take perverted, terrible forms, stopped working for EDUCATION of stamina and endurance , has become just a terry mockery of some over others! Moreover, which is characteristic, where the service was characterized by increased risk, high physical, moral and intellectual stress, hazing did not take on goblin, ugly forms! So it was (at least in the mid-70s of the last century) in the Airborne Forces, in the Fleets, in the Strategic Missile Forces, in the technical troops, where either physical readiness of the highest level or good knowledge of military specialty was required. In the same place, where the psychological, intellectual and physical loads were lower (Avtorots, economic platoons, Stroibat, etc.), hazing took terrifying, ugly forms, not educating, but crippling soldiers! I'll tell you what I know personally. Grandfathers in the unit, after training, poked us in the tail and mane, but! There have never been any attempts to make them work for themselves ("slavery"), any hemming of collars, streaking and ironing uniforms, and the like! If there were attempts, they, as a rule, were severely suppressed either by the old-timers themselves or by the officers! But to press on you during physical training, yes, it was in the order of things! after the shooting, everyone also cleaned himself! But they could embed a gaping spirit, so that the raven would not catch with its beak! And they explained at the same time: "boy, the enemy will not warn you!" True, when one spirit in response put a grandfather, which is called, "From the heart!", And he "climbed into the bottle" he was held back by the "old people" themselves - "what are you digging for? The hedgehog did everything right!" And another such moment! A sense of pride was constantly cultivated in us: we are a landing party! Others can't stand what we are! It was possible to submit a report and you were transferred to serve in other troops ... All this led to the fact that there was no obvious antagonism between calls! Both young and old-timers understood when it was possible (and necessary) to drive the young, and when it was necessary to help. After all, tomorrow you can be behind enemy lines, and the one you drive today will have a machine gun! To the credit of the officers, they regularly conveyed this idea to every old-timer. I will not dissemble that we had brotherhood and good air, but I don’t remember anything special atrocities.

It is a completely different matter when the “grandfathers”, who have gone berserk, considering themselves the navel of the earth, start bullying the young ... Here, perhaps, only one thing can be said. The commanders who allowed SUCH a development of events must be mercilessly judged under the article "undermining the defense capability of the armed forces", because it cannot be anything else. Pressing, even hard, almost cruel, but thought out and calculated, has nothing to do with the mores of the "black zone"! The task of "hazing" is to make soldiers out of conscripts, and not cripples, physical and moral. And it depends very much on the Officers what forms the notorious hazing has taken in his unit or part!

I would be grateful for comments and thoughts expressed in the discussion!

The problem of army hazing worries school graduates from the moment they begin to prepare for university entrance. Indeed, currently the best way to delay military service is to continue studying. But is there hazing in the army and is it as terrible as they describe? Let's figure it out.

call

In order to better understand the problem, we will begin to consider the entire year of the army life of a conscript in order. So, imagine that a young man receives a summons, arranges a farewell, and in the morning goes to the recruiting station. He is awaited by a medical commission, and then - distribution.

KMB

This is the course of a young fighter - the period before the guy is sworn in and officially served in the army. It seems that the soldier has not yet been assigned to any company or division, but hazing in the army begins here.

For example, "grandfather" enters the location and demands that at the same time all the young animals get up from the stools (beds), and one person must shout: "Get up!" Is this hazing? Some might think yes. However, in practice, this teaches young recruits to rise when a senior officer enters the location. And this is already the charter of military service, and the sooner a young soldier learns to fulfill it, the better for his unit. After all, the main principle in any army is: "One mows - everyone suffers."

One more example. You need to know exactly what a particular military unit requires from a conscript. Hazing during the KMB is often aimed at educating and accustoming "youngsters" to army life. In some "secret" army units it is forbidden to use a mobile phone. In such cases, "grandfathers" often intimidate newcomers by taking away the phone if they notice. In practice, this only brings benefits. After all, otherwise the officer will take the mobile, and it will be very difficult to return it. Therefore, the conscript learns to hide his gadget as early as possible.

Oath

Oddly enough, hazing in the army is monotonous and boring. The "grandfathers" have fun making the call to exercise. Who is smarter, masks his activities for training to walk in formation. But even this benefits the conscript himself. Endurance increases, and the necessary skills are developed. And it's better to let the "grandfather" drive the company once more than then the whole unit will get nuts from the inspection that has arrived because of one negligent soldier.

Therefore, everything that was done before the oath is designed to discipline the future fighter. And now the newly minted soldier is distributed and assigned to his new unit, which should become his family for a year. Hazing in the army is just beginning.

Appearance

Service in the army itself can be divided into many interrelated aspects. Let's start with what is checked every morning by officers - from the appearance of a soldier. There are several main parameters by which appearance is evaluated:

• a haircut;
• the presence of bristles on the face;
• cleanliness of clothes and shoes;
• lined collars;
• trimmed nails.

For each omission in any of the points, "grandfather" can punish a young fighter. Punishments range from a few push-ups to cleaning the toilet. It seems to be an atrocity: just for not shaving, you have to scrub the toilet. But let's look at it from the other side. Points 2 and 5 should be done by any self-respecting person. It is necessary to cut your hair so that lice do not start in unsanitary conditions. Points 3 and 4 are the self-respect of any person. And it’s hardly pleasant for others to look at an unwashed ragamuffin. It turns out that, despite the fact that people are forced to do something by threats, all actions are aimed solely at their own benefit.

Work

Another moment in which hazing in the army is manifested is outfits. The "grandfathers" try to get the easiest places to dress up, while the "young" hunchbacks anywhere.

Unfortunately, this is inherent in human nature itself. Stuffed by previous "grandfathers", the current senior conscripts want to assert themselves at the expense of the "young". This is normal. It is very difficult to stop such a cycle, so any assurances that hazing in the Russian army has been defeated are complete lies.

The increased frequency of young recruits joining the outfit is one of the main signs of hazing in a particular unit. But at the same time, it should be remembered that any conscript who wrote to his mother and complained about how the "grandfathers" treated him would happily run in the same way to mock the next call after him.

So this is rather the norm for any part. The first six months the "young" one works, the second six months - the next call.

Ustavshchina

Perhaps for many this will be a revelation, but, in addition to hazing, there are also statutory ones. But which of these is worse is a moot point.

Often in units in which hazing flourishes, this is due to the fact that the officers spit on their subordinates. That is, the officers do not care what the soldiers do. They are rarely driven to work, and the only problem of such parts is boredom. Therefore, "grandfathers" thrive in them.

Of course, there is no hazing in the statutory demonstration parts. Simply because even the "grandfathers" do not have the strength to mock the new arrivals. In such military units, the soldier will have to work until the very demobilization. And this is the main reason why hazing in the Airborne Forces and other airborne combat units is a rarity.

If we talk about ordinary, ordinary, military units, then the soldiers usually choose hazing themselves. If the conscript was transferred from the authorized part to the "grandfather", then, according to him, it's like getting to a resort. Strange, but true. Those who have served know perfectly well that it is better to endure "grandfathers" for half a year than to creep in front of officers for the entire service life.

A vivid example. They collect parts from all over the region for a concert in some town. The soldiers from the hazing unit stand quietly and smoke on the sidelines, and the pupils of the "Ustavshchina", even to go to smoke, ask permission from the sergeant. Agree, even the illusion of freedom will make it much easier to endure the deprivation of military service.

To be or not to be

How long has hazing been around? In the Soviet army, this phenomenon also took place. Of course, this does not apply to the period of the war, but in most parts, especially in distant and hard-to-reach places, hazing has always flourished. After all, the main reason for its appearance is boredom. For two years of military service, there was nothing to do.

Hazing in the Soviet army was mainly expressed in physical punishment and the use of soldiers as toys. Especially popular was the game "Demobilization Train". Young replenishment rocks the bed of "grandfather" and depicts the sounds of a steam locomotive. This is how the senior conscripts imagined their way home.

Now, in the era of smartphones and players, such bullying is a thing of the past, and what was described in this article is often the maximum that "grandfathers" are capable of.

Wrestling

Hazing in the army is a phenomenon that everyone is trying to fight. But how effective it is, it is difficult to judge. In most cases, everything is very skillfully disguised as a charter and punishment for misconduct, fortunately, there is always something to complain about.

The only advice that can be given here is not to complain about hazing. Well, they will put "grandfather" in jail for "bullying", senior officers will be punished financially, and the victim will be transferred to another unit. But nothing will change, and it will only get worse. Rumors are spreading, and in the new part everyone will hate the "informer", including both officers and those who were called up at the same time as him.

And for cases in which soldiers "die because of hazing," psychologists and psychiatrists are responsible for allowing an unbalanced person to serve.

Finally, I would like to clarify. This article is not at all intended to protect hazing or those who kill conscripts. But such "creatures" are everywhere, and not only in the army. Robbers, rapists, and murderers are encountered in everyday life, and in the same way they either escape punishment or receive ridiculous sentences. The main task of this topic is to show that in many respects relations in the army depend on the conscript himself and on how he puts himself in the team.