Demo versions of the exam in computer science. C27: difficult programming task. Structure of KIM Unified State Examination


08.09.2017

Approximate topics that may be included in the final essay (in 11th grade) in the direction of “Man and Society”.

  • What is the conflict between man and society?
  • Do you agree with Plautus’ statement: “man is a wolf to man”?
  • What do you think the thought of A. De Saint-Exupery means: “All roads lead to people”?
  • Can a person exist outside of society?
  • Can a person change society?
  • How does society influence a person?
  • Is society responsible for every person?
  • How does society influence an individual's opinion?
  • Do you agree with the statement of G. K. Lichtenberg: “In every person there is something from all people.
  • Is it possible to live in society and be free from it?
  • What is tolerance?
  • Why is it important to maintain individuality?
  • Confirm or refute the statement of A. de Staël: “You cannot be confident either in your behavior or in your well-being when we make it dependent on human opinion.”
  • Do you agree with the statement: “Inequality humiliates people and creates disagreement and hatred among them”?
  • Do you think it is fair to say that strong people Are you often lonely?
  • Is Tyutchev’s opinion true that “any weakening of mental life in society inevitably entails an increase in material inclinations and vile egoistic instincts”?
  • Are social norms of behavior necessary?
  • What kind of person can be called dangerous to society?
  • Do you agree with V. Rozanov’s statement: “Society and those around us diminish the soul, not add it. “Adds” only the closest and rarest sympathy, “soul to soul” and “one mind”?
  • Can any person be called a person?
  • What happens to a person cut off from society?
  • Why should society help the disadvantaged?
  • How do you understand I. Becher’s statement: “A person becomes a person only among people”?
  • Do you agree with the statement of H. Keller: “The most wonderful life“It’s a life lived for other people.”
  • In what situations does a person feel lonely in society?
  • What is the role of personality in history?
  • How does society influence a person's decisions?
  • Confirm or refute I. Goethe’s statement: “A person can know himself only in people.”
  • How do you understand F. Bacon’s statement: “Whoever loves solitude, either wild beast, or the Lord God"?
  • Is a person responsible to society for his actions?
  • Is it difficult to defend your interests before society?
  • How do you understand the words of S.E. Letsa: “Zero is nothing, but two zeros already mean something”?
  • Is it necessary to express your opinion if it differs from the majority opinion?
  • There is safety in numbers?
  • What is more important: personal interests or the interests of society?
  • What does society's indifference to people lead to?
  • Do you agree with the opinion of A. Maurois: “You should not focus on public opinion. This is not a lighthouse, but will-o'-the-wisps"?
  • How do you understand the expression “little man”?
  • Why does a person strive to be original?
  • Does society need leaders?
  • Do you agree with the words of K. Marx: “If you want to influence other people, then you must be a person who really stimulates and moves other people forward”?
  • Can a person devote his life to the interests of society?
  • Who is a misanthrope?
  • How do you understand the statement of A.S. Pushkin: “The frivolous world mercilessly persecutes in reality what it allows in theory”?
  • What does inequality in society lead to?
  • Are social norms changing?
  • Do you agree with the words of K. L. Berne: “A person can do without many things, but not without a person”?
  • Is a person responsible to society?
  • Can an individual win a fight against society?
  • How can a person change history?
  • Do you think it is important to have your own opinion?
  • Can a person become an individual in isolation from society?
  • How do you understand G. Freytag’s statement: “In the soul of every person there is a miniature portrait of his people”?
  • Is it possible to violate social norms?
  • What is the place of a person in a totalitarian state?
  • How do you understand the phrase: “one head is good, but two is better”?
  • Are there people whose work is invisible to society?
  • Is it difficult to maintain individuality in a team?
  • Do you agree with W. Blackstone’s statement: “Man is created for society. He is unable and does not have
    courage to live alone"?
  • Confirm or refute the statement of D. M. Cage: “We need communication more than anything else”
  • What is equality in society?
  • Why are public organizations needed?
  • Is it possible to say that a person’s happiness depends solely on the characteristics of his social life?
  • Do you agree that society shapes a person?
  • How does society treat people who are very different from it?
  • How do you understand the statement of W. James: “Society degrades if it does not receive impulses from individuals”?
  • How do you understand the phrase “social consciousness”?
  • What is missing in modern society?
  • Do you agree with I. Goethe’s statement: “Man cannot live in solitude, he needs society”?
  • How do you understand T. Dreiser’s statement: “People think about us what we want to inspire them with”?
  • Do you agree that “there is nothing more dangerous in society than a person without character”?

Based on project materials

(356 words)

What's happened individual in an endless network public relations? This is the main element of society that constantly interacts with it. From childhood we socialize, adapt and live according to the rules that society dictates to us. It is no coincidence that the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle called man a “social animal.” But society does not always have a beneficial effect on the individual; sometimes, under its influence, he loses his individuality and more.

Thus, in Kuprin’s story “Olesya,” the heroine becomes a victim of social prejudice. The peasants believe that she is a witch because she lives in the forest and collects medicinal herbs. People hate the poor girl just because she is different from them. In an attempt to get closer to the team for the sake of her lover, she leaves the secluded region and goes to church. Then the crowd attacked her and almost killed her. This is how an attempt to enter the system of social relations almost ended in tragedy for the heroine, and such treatment often forces a person to submit to pressure and become the same as everyone else. Flight saved Olesya from such a fate, but not everyone can use this radical method.

The inhabitants of the shelter, the heroes of Gorky’s play “At the Lower Depths,” have nowhere to run. If we consider each of them separately, then we have before us a good person, and nothing in his life foreshadowed such a fate. But all together the people of the bottom formed a cesspool from which none of them could escape. For example, Satin was a successful and prosperous person until he punished his sister’s offender, resulting in a prison sentence. Even there, the man retained his dignity, served his sentence, but when he was free, he discovered that he was no longer considered a human being, and society normal people turned away from him. In order not to die of hunger, he could only continue to walk along the crooked path. Yes, alone social group she ruined him with her indifference, and the other pulled him into her vicious net, not allowing him to cleanse himself. Satin is a victim of a society that thinks in prejudices and stereotypes.

So, situations often arise when a person is not able to live normally in the existing system of social relations. Sometimes he struggles with the point of view and behavior of the majority, but most often he forgets about personal opinion and broadcasts collective attitudes. However, of course, people should strive to change society in better side, while not being afraid of reproaches and censures on his part. Only then can progress be made.

Interesting? Save it on your wall!

The relationship between man and society is one of the most frequently raised topics in Russian literature. Many writers in their works created the image of a “fighter against the system,” an extraordinary personality who, for some reason, was not satisfied with the usual way of life. Based on the reader's experience, we will speculate on whether one person can resist the whole society.

The images of “heroes of our time” that have already become classics, characters whose names have long since become household names, are remembered by most readers as the same “fighters against the system”, but this confrontation can hardly be called successful. It's about, for example, about the main character of the novel A.S. Pushkin "Eugene Onegin". He positioned himself as a person separate from society. On the one hand, Onegin was a black sheep among socialites and did not differ much from those who were fans of balls and theatrical performances. But with the onset of the blues, Evgeniy very quickly cut himself off from everything secular society and moved to the village. There he, too, at first not wanting to come into contact with anyone, after a short period of time was already dancing at Tatyana’s name day. Such inconsistency hardly fits into the concept of “resistance to society,” but Onegin often openly expressed his position as a loner, not taking into account anyone’s opinion and rejecting the typical methods of entertainment and leisure for many. But the duel with Lensky showed that the opinion of the village residents matters even to Evgeniy, because he took this step, including being afraid of conversations behind his back.

Attempts to change society and resist established norms were made by the hero of the novel F.M. Dostoevsky "Crime and Punishment". As a young and promising student, tired of widespread evil, bile and dirt, Raskolnikov created his own theory, with the help of which, it seemed to him, it would be possible to completely change the world. This theory about “trembling creatures” and “having the right” was supposed to become the hero’s weapon in opposition to society, but even such a radical approach had no prospects. As the actions developed, it became clear that, firstly, the theory itself was so inhumane that the very character of Raskolnikov, an inherently good-natured person, rejected such a method of fighting the system as murder. And therefore the pangs of conscience for a long time tormented the hero until he himself admitted the inconsistency of the method he had invented to change the world. And secondly, it seems to me that it was a very rash step to start a fight against society without like-minded people. After all, a person, by his nature, always needs approval of his thoughts and actions from the outside. But Raskolnikov met only Sonya on his difficult path, who, on the contrary, convinced Rodion and directed his thoughts in a completely different direction.

So can one person stand up to an entire society? History knows many similar attempts, but in the example literary heroes one can understand that in order to resist society, it is not enough just to have a desire. “Alone in the field is not a warrior,” says folk wisdom, and it seems to me that in any struggle you need a “team” strong in spirit individuals who are confident in their thoughts and actions and are ready to sacrifice themselves for the sake of an idea.


Personally, I believe that it is impossible to abstract ourselves from society while being a human being, that is, a biosocial being. Vladimir Ilyich Lenin himself said this. One way or another, we are all born into society. We are also dying in society. We have no choice, everything is already predetermined before we are born, before we have the opportunity to choose. But in everyone’s hands is their future and, possibly, the future of the people around them.

So can one single person change society?

Personally, I believe that nothing is impossible, that absolutely any person can achieve something and then control the masses, thereby deforming society and the social system. But if you are very poor, unknown, uneducated, then it will be very difficult for you to change anything without making a huge effort. Pondering the question of this essay, I immediately remembered several works of art, in which the problem of the relationship between man and society is raised.

Thus, the main character of Turgenev’s “Fathers and Sons,” Evgeny Bazarov, is a vivid example of a person who goes against society, against the established foundations in this very society.

As his comrade Arkady said: “He is a nihilist.” This means that Bazarov rejects everything, i.e. he is a skeptic. Despite this, he is unable to come up with anything new. Evgeny is one of those people who only criticize, attracting more and more people to his views, but without any specific, alternative ideas and views. Thus, as we see throughout the novel, Bazarov only argues with the older generation, without saying anything concrete in return. His job is to deny, but others will “build.” As we see in in this example Bazarov fails to change society - he dies at the end of the novel. Personally, I think that the main character was ahead of his time, born when no one was ready for change.

In addition, let us remember the novel “Crime and Punishment” by F. M. Dostoevsky. Main character In this work, Rodion Raskolnikov develops his own theory about “trembling creatures” and “those who have the right.” According to it, all people in the world are divided into “lower” and “higher”. The former can be killed by the latter without any consequences or punishment. The main character cannot be one hundred percent sure of it, which is why he decides to check it himself. He kills the old pawnbroker, thinking that this will only make things better for everyone. As a result, for a long time after the murder the hero is tormented by mental anguish and conscience, after which Rodion confesses to the crime and receives his second punishment. In this example we see how the main character had his own own idea, a theory that did not spread among people and died in the head of its creator. Rodion could not even overcome himself, so he could not change society in any way.

Reflecting on the problem of this essay, I came to the conclusion that one person cannot change the entire society. And the examples given from the literature helped me with this.

Updated: 2017-10-25

Attention!
If you notice an error or typo, highlight the text and click Ctrl+Enter.
By doing so, you will provide invaluable benefit to the project and other readers.

Thank you for your attention.