Nikon reflex camera. Choosing a digital camera: Canon or Nikon
Every day I get questions like ‘ which Nikon DSLR to buy‘. In this article, I will share my experience in this regard. I have shot with almost all Nikon DSLRs with different lenses and in different conditions. Some things in choosing a camera for beginners may not be obvious, but believe me, in this article I have thought out everything as much as possible and adjusted it to the best and most truthful options.
To begin with, I advise you to understand what is a camera for, after which you need to determine the most suitable class of cameras that are suitable for the selected tasks.
All Nikon digital SLR cameras are very simply divided into 4 classes:
- Amateur cameras (entry level)- these cameras are aimed at people who just need to get a high-quality photo without delving into the intricacies and settings of the camera. These are the so-called cameras – ‘ pointed and removed. Most often, amateur cameras are best suited to people who do not take photographs professional but just want a good camera for home, leisure, travel, family, nature, etc.. The main requirements for such a camera are lightness, ease of use, reasonable price.
- Advanced amateur cameras (advanced level)- these cameras have advanced functionality with a large number of specific settings that can be dealt with for a long time. These cameras are suitable for advanced amateurs who at least basic understanding of camera settings or want to get a good potential for mastering skills in photography. These cameras are noticeably more expensive, heavier, but still with the same intuitive controls as entry-level cameras.
- Professional cameras (high end cameras)- these cameras are designed for people who are professional photographers, who know a lot about photography and are not afraid of manual settings. Typically, such cameras have a much better body, functionality and support for additional extensions and features. These cameras are not suitable for hobbyists as do not have automatic shooting modes and have specific professional management with few tips.
- Flagship professional cameras(TOP cameras) - these are cameras with extraordinary workmanship and functionality, they are needed exclusively for professional purposes. These are the cameras that everyone else looks up to as a ‘flagship’. These cameras are not suitable for beginners and amateurs.
Nikon itself makes the distribution even simpler, only professional and amateur cameras exist on the official Nikon website, but wikipedia also divides Nikon cameras into 4 levels. By the way, the word 'camera', 'camera' and 'camera' in this article, and in many others, mean the same thing. View a graphical distribution of cameras by category can .
The camera is hard technical device and technology is not standing still. It so happened that in my ranking cameras from Nikon traced a clear relationship between the camera's output into the light The newer the camera, the better it is. For 2017, following this logic and other details, the best amateur camera is Nikon D5600, this can be seen from the plate below.
When choosing a camera, I do not recommend paying much attention to the number of megapixels, in most cases a large number of megapixels are not in demand and even unnecessary (these issues are covered in more detail, and). Again capital letters- think about the fact that megapixels in amateur-level SLR cameras do not solve anything at all.
Among advanced amateur cameras, the best is full-frame. If you don’t want to mess with a full frame, then the best option among cropped cameras is Nikon D7500.
| Model | Rating | Exit time | Number of MP | fps speed | Focus points. | Video | Comment |
| (FX) | 1 | September 2014 | 24,3 | 6,5 | 51 | Full HD 60p with autofocus | The best option for an advanced amateur camera. Full frame. |
| (FX) | 2 | October 2013 | 24,3 | 6,0 | 39 | Full HD 30p with autofocus | A very good option for an advanced amateur camera. Full frame. |
| (FX) | 3 | November 2012 | 24,3 | 5,5 | 39 | Full HD 30p with autofocus | A good option for an advanced amateur camera. Full frame. |
| D7500 | 4 | April 2017 | 20,2 | 8 | 51 | 4K autofocus | The best cropped advanced amateur camera. |
| 5 | March 2015 | 24,0 | 6 (7) | 51 | Full HD 30p (DX) and 60p (1.3x) with autofocus | A very good version of a cropped advanced amateur camera. | |
| 6 | February 2013 | 24,0 | 6 (7) | 51 | Full HD 30p (DX) and 60i (1.3x) with autofocus | A good option for a cropped advanced amateur camera. | |
| 7 | November 2010 | 16,2 | 6 | 39 | Full HD 24p with autofocus | A good option for a cropped camera | |
| 8 | October 2008 | 12,3 | 4,5 | 11 | HD 720p, no autofocus | Good, bad video | |
| 9 | September 2006 | 10,2 | 3 | 11 | Not | Old camera with good features | |
| 10 | April 2005 | 6,1 | 3 | 5 | Not | ||
| 11 | January 2004 | 6,1 | 3 | 5 | Not | Obsolete camera, has a small display, few focus points |
Advanced amateur cameras, D7500 are cameras. Cameras are full-length, Nikon class FX. Unlike amateur cameras, all advanced hobby cameras have and can use non-motorized, sometimes cheaper type optics (optics may also be suitable). These cameras have a monochrome display for quick adjustment of all major functions, an additional selector below the shutter button, a depth-of-field preview button, and their built-in flash can . All advanced amateur cameras, except, are very useful when using external flashes.
A good option for an advanced camera would be the model that I recommend as Nikon's first SLR camera for advanced users who want to get a lot of functionality for not a very large amount of money. There are also pleasant controls, a huge 3-inch display, the ability to control flashes through, Live View mode and high-quality video shooting.
About filming: auto focus on all Nikon SLR cameras does not work well or not very well when shooting video. This is because the DSLR mechanism is not well adapted to focusing with the mirror up, which is required by video mode. Usually focusing when recording video occurs by contrast, and not using the camera's phase sensors. You need to be prepared for the fact that autofocus speed will sometimes be hundreds of times worse than on conventional compact cameras. If the speed and accuracy of focusing for video is very important, then I recommend to consider buying Nikon Z6, Nikon Z7 mirrorless cameras.
Nikon Z mount mirrorless cameras
Nikon has full-frame mirrorless cameras Nikon Z6 and Nikon Z7, as well as a small fleet of lenses for them. In general, these cameras are at the level of the SLR or even slightly above it. These cameras can be used with lenses from SLR cameras using a Nikon FTM adapter. If there are a lot of problems with accurate information, it’s better to ask me about these cameras in the comments.
Equipment
Usually the camera is sold separately from the lens, this is called body, and sometimes the camera is sold with a lens, this is called, and the lens supplied is called ‘ whale lens‘. Attention: take pictures with one camera body you can’t, you should always take pictures with a lens.
Important: Usually, if you buy a camera together with a kit lens (Kit kit), then such a kit will cost less than buying a camera and lens separately.
Regular (whale) lens
List of all professional lenses for Nikon cameras DX can be found (there are only 4 of them).
The choice of other non-universal lenses requires a separate large article, but in addition to the standard (universal kit) lens, I recommend getting a high-aperture discrete lens. Such a lens does not know how to zoom, but it has a very high . A huge one will allow you to easily shoot in low light conditions, control the depth of field (create), create an effect, get brighter and richer colors in your photos. In good light, such a lens allows you to shoot at a very short distance, thereby.
- (for any Nikon DX cameras)
- (for any cameras)
- (for any focus)
Usually the first such lens is the so-called ‘ ‘ (the list contains the last two). Whole the lineup fifty dollars for Nikon cameras can be found.
You will find a complete list of all Nikon DX lenses.
You will find thoughts on choosing an additional one in the section
How to check the camera upon purchase is described in the ‘ ‘.
Nikon or Canon? I have raised this issue in a series of articles on this issue:,.
My experience
I personally had many Nikon cameras at my disposal: (about 4 years old), (3 years old), (2 years old), (2 years old), (1 year old), (half a year), (half a year), (half a year), ( 2 years), Canon (1 year), Canon 300D (half a year), (1 year), (about a year), (), many cameras from other brands (like Sony a7). Due to the fact that I write and work as a professional photographer, I held and shot in my hands on almost all models of Nikon and Canon SLR cameras.
Over the past 2-3 years, I shoot all orders on or (I take from friends). Also, I like, which I use for the needs of this site. For home in 2015, I bought myself, which I love very much for a pleasant color rendering. In 2017 I bought and, which is not a pity to use in any conditions, the gallery of pictures from this camera is located just below. In 2018, in fact, I got it for nothing, you can look at the pictures from it. I am not shy about shooting with old cameras, because I know for sure that the final result depends more on other factors ().
From personal experience I can add that choosing a camera is not an easy task, it is especially difficult to choose the first camera, then everything becomes simpler and choosing something else becomes very, very simple. Take my advice - do not chase megapixels, they practically do not solve anything. I wish everyone to find exactly 'their best camera', and also remember that, and not by what means.
Alternative versions at the lowest price
If you have a desire to take pictures in your blood, and the budget for the purchase of a SLR camera is very limited, then I recommend looking towards used cameras. Used There is nothing wrong with cameras. For example, for only 100 c.u. you can buy used (or , or , or , or ) with a kit lens. Even such an old DSLR will be in many ways better than some modern digital cameras and even advanced cameras with interchangeable lenses, for example, such as .
All images were taken with and . or .
Here you can see my gallery of shots, obtained with , paired with a very cheap and simple universal zoom lens from a third party manufacturer -
© 2018 website
In view of the severity of the topic I am raising, I will try to be as objective and impartial as possible. This means that I will not make a final judgment about which manufacturer of photographic equipment - Nikon or Canon - is the best, but only using specific facts as an example, I will try to show how Nikon really differs from Canon, and how they are similar. You can read about the history of development and mutual confrontation between the two companies in the article “Nikon and Canon: Comparative History”.
Nikon and Canon are worth each other. Both systems are good, but good in different ways. Anyone who seriously claims the unequivocal advantage of one brand over another is either a fool or financially interested in promoting a particular brand. Participation in the Nikon vs. Canon” is for technophile newcomers, for whom photography is a fashionable hobby, and not at all a way of artistic expression.
A self-respecting photographer does not make a cult out of his tools. He won't wear a Canon or Nikon jersey (at least he won't do it for free). He chooses photographic equipment based on personal preferences and creative or professional tasks which it is called upon to solve. If the system he uses ceases to cope with the duties assigned to it, then with a clear conscience he can take a device of a different brand, or even change the entire system without feeling like a traitor.
Both Nikon and Canon make excellent cameras and lenses - the best in the professional small format digital camera market. Among the photographers who prefer the products of either of the two photo giants, there are quite a few both successful professionals and talented amateurs.
By number of digital SLR sales Canon cameras and Nikon occupy first and second places, respectively, managing to remain, it seems, the only two companies for which the production of photographic equipment is now not unprofitable.
Nikon (Americans pronounce "Nikon", Japanese - "Nikon") is a relatively small corporation with an annual turnover of about $7 billion and a staff of 25,000 employees. At the same time, Nikon is part of the giant Mitsubishi Group. In addition to cameras and photographic lenses (both small and large format), Nikon manufactures binoculars, spotting scopes, optical rangefinders, medical optics, microscopes, scanners, and photolithographic steppers for the semiconductor industry. However, it is photographic equipment that brings Nikon three-quarters of his income.
Canon - much more big company(annual turnover of 27 billion dollars, the number of employees 198 thousand), for which the production of cameras is no longer priority. Canon produces video and film cameras, as well as cinematographic and television lenses (which cost an order of magnitude more expensive than photographic ones), printers, scanners, copiers, calculators, medical and photolithographic equipment.
No company other than Canon and Nikon can afford to dedicate virtually unlimited resources to camera development. First of all, this concerns optics, where Nikon and Canon, with their vast experience, have no equal. They are somewhat conservative in terms of implementation innovative technologies(touch screens, Wi-Fi and GPS modules built into the camera, etc.), but they are traditionally distinguished by the closest attention to image quality, camera ergonomics, flexibility and versatility of the system as a whole.
Both Nikon and Canon have both professional and amateur models to suit all tastes and pockets. The differences between directly competing models of the two brands are not in quality, but in control features, in the menu structure, in the settings logic, i.e. in things that cannot be quantification, but being the object of individual preferences and habits. Below I am concrete examples I will illustrate the features of Canon and Nikon's approach to photography, but first, a few words about the attitude of both companies to different types of cameras.
Compact cameras
Both Canon and Nikon produce many models of compact cameras: from the simplest point-and-shoot cameras to ultra-zooms and compacts with large sensors (Canon has a richer choice in terms of the latter). In fairness, it should be noted that compact cameras from Nikon and Canon do not fundamentally differ from each other or from soap dishes from other companies. Both Nikon and Canon have both very successful and frankly failed models. However, compact cameras from Sony, Fujifilm or Panasonic, in fact, are no worse. Soap dishes are not part of a larger system like DSLRs, and therefore the photographic heritage of Nikon and Canon gives them almost no competitive advantage.
It should be understood that the market for compact cameras is going through hard times. Progress does not stand still. Everyone who used to shoot for the protocol on a soap dish got smartphones with a built-in camera and see no reason to pay for a separate device. “Advanced” amateur photographers (the target audience of ultrazooms and pseudo-DSLRs) are switching either to cheaper SLR cameras or to mirrorless cameras that are gaining popularity. There remain a few enthusiasts for whom the capabilities of a mobile phone are not enough, but who do not want to get involved with interchangeable optics.
Mirrorless cameras
It wasn't until 2018 that Nikon and Canon finally decided to take mirrorless cameras seriously, almost simultaneously introducing completely new full-frame mirrorless systems: Nikon Z and Canon EOS R. Obviously, in the near future, when we say "Nikon" or "Canon", we we will have in mind primarily these systems, but at the moment it is still difficult to call them mature due to the extremely meager choice of cameras and lenses.
The pioneer in terms of full-frame mirrorless cameras and the most serious competitor to Nikon and Canon is Sony.
Since 2012, Canon has also been trying, with varying success, to promote the APS-C mirrorless system (crop factor 1.6) - Canon EOS M. Due to the fairly large matrix, EOS M cameras are not inferior to DSLRs in image quality, but lose to them in ergonomics, and are more expensive for comparable parameters.
The Nikon 1 system, which was introduced in 2011, stopped being updated after five years. However, she never enjoyed great popularity outside of Japan. The small sensor (crop factor 2.7) and soapy controls made the entire Nikon 1 system unacceptable for any serious use.
In any case, Fujifilm X, Sony α or Olympus Micro 4/3 cropped mirrorless systems still compare favorably with what Canon and even more so Nikon offer, so the oldies have something to work on.
SLR cameras
It is in this area that the toughest and most intense struggle takes place. Nikon and Canon have driven out almost all competitors from the market of SLR cameras and now they are trying not to concede to each other in anything. The consequence of this battle for the hearts and wallets of photographers is the fact that the price-performance ratio of both brands is about the same. Two cameras of equal cost will have comparable capabilities. However, equal does not mean equal. Cameras manufactured by Nikon and Canon are distinguished by a great many small nuances, which may be insignificant individually, but in their totality make each particular photographer clearly prefer one brand to another. We will talk about these features.
Matrix Format
In 2018, both companies launched full-frame mirrorless cameras with new mounts: Nikon Z and Canon RF. In both cases, old lenses designed for SLR cameras can be mounted on new mirrorless cameras using adapters. However, if in the case of Canon all EF lenses are unconditionally compatible with EOS R cameras, then Nikon again backfired on the 86th year, and the old autofocus lenses without a built-in motor, although they sit on Nikon Z cameras, are focused only manually. But manual lenses from 1959 work perfectly.
Lenses
Both companies produce a wide variety of lenses. The richest choice optics is the main reason to prefer Nikon or Canon to other brands. It's impossible to talk about the advantage of one over the other, since you will have to work hard to find a Nikon lens that cannot be found a worthy alternative among Canon lenses, and vice versa. But there are some nuances here, mainly related to budget models.
The Canon system lacks a normal fast prime for cropped cameras, while Nikon has a great 35mm f/1.8 DX lens. Canon's equivalent is the full-frame EF 35mm f/2, but it's more expensive and not as good optically.
But Canon has a wonderful and cheap "fifty kopeck" EF 50mm f / 1.8 II, which can work on all Canon cameras without exception. A similar lens from Nikon - 50mm f / 1.8D - will not focus on cameras without a built-in focusing motor, and the newer Nikon 50mm f / 1.8G, which can work properly even on lower models of cameras, costs twice as much as Canon's fifty dollars.
The simplest standard lens 18-55mm, with which many start, Nikon's performance is both sharper and better.
In both systems, to my greatest regret, there are no light wide-angle fixes for crop. The first person to release a compact DX or EF-S equivalent in 24mm f/2.8 will really grow in my eyes. By the way, most competitors have such lenses, which does not honor Nikon and Canon.
I don't like superzooms, but the Nikon system is full of them. Both the 18-200 f/3.5-5.6G VR DX II and the 18-300 f/3.5-5.6G VR DX are very solid lenses. Canon EF-S 18-200 f/3.5-5.6 IS differs not in better side. For full frame Nikon makes the 28-300 f/3.5-5.6G VR a very well balanced amateur lens. The luxurious Canon EF 28-300 f/3.5-5.6L IS USM is only good in theory, being twice as heavy and three times as expensive as the Nikon.
Canon produces autofocus lenses with maximum aperture up to f/1.2 (in the past - up to f/1), and Nikon - only up to f/1.4 (with manual focus - up to f/1.2).
Canon TS-E perspective distortion correction lenses (tilt-shift) are much more practical than comparable Nikon PC-E lenses.
There are many such examples, but in general, I repeat, the Nikon and Canon systems are quite equivalent and do not let each other down.
Filter diameter
In the good old days (60-70 years) everyone Nikon lenses had a thread for filters with a diameter of 52 mm. Today, Nikon cares little about standardization and uses nine (!) Different sizes: 52, 55, 58, 62, 67, 72, 77, 82 and 95 mm.
Canon is not much better. Canon lenses have filter threads in the following seven diameters: 49, 52, 58, 67, 72, 77 and 82mm.
Both should have gone the extra mile and reduced the number of diameters used to at least three, but Nikon and Canon prefer to ignore the problem.
Ergonomics and control
Ease of management is the best important characteristic any photographic system, since it is in many situations that it depends on it whether you can take a picture or miss this opportunity. Everyone has their own preferences: for some, the Canon interface seems more friendly, and for some it is easier to manage Nikon. I advise you to at least try cameras from both manufacturers before deciding which one will allow you to work faster and more comfortably.
Dials and buttons
The main governing bodies of most Nikon cameras are two disks rotating around vertical axes. The main dial is located at the back, in the upper right corner of the camera body, under thumb, and the auxiliary disc is in front, within the reach of the middle finger. Thus, the photographer is able to rotate both dials without removing the index finger from the shutter button. The rear (main) dial controls shutter speed in S and M modes, and program shift in P mode. The front (auxiliary) dial controls aperture in modes A and M. To compensate for exposure, press the +/- button located next to the shutter button with your index finger and, while holding it, twist the rear dial with your thumb.
On younger Nikons, there is no front control dial, and the only rear dial is responsible for controlling both shutter speed and aperture, depending on the selected mode.
Canon's older devices also have two disks, but they rotate around horizontal (or rather, sagittal) axes. The main disk is located on top, directly above the shutter button, and the auxiliary disk is at the back, but not in the corner, as on Nikons, but below and slightly to the left, under the pad thumb. I find this arrangement not very convenient, since it is difficult to reach any of the disks without changing the position of the hand.
The rear disc is equipped with a safety lock to prevent accidental rotation.
Unlike Nikon cameras, where the main dial always controls shutter speed and the secondary aperture, Canon's main (top) dial controls either shutter speed (Tv and M modes), or aperture (Av mode), or program shift (P mode). ). The rear (auxiliary) dial controls aperture in M mode, and in all other modes it is used for exposure compensation.
There is no rear dial on the younger Canon models, and you have to set the exposure compensation with your index finger using the top dial, while holding the +/- button located on the back of the camera with your thumb.
On Canon's mirrorless cameras, the rear dial has moved up, and its axis is now oriented vertically, like Nikon's.
In addition, Canon RF lenses are equipped with an additional control ring with which you can control aperture, ISO, exposure compensation, etc.
Both in Canons and in Nikons for operational management other camera functions—white balance, ISO sensitivity, autofocus and flash modes, shutter release modes, metering methods, image size, and image quality—use the same command dials, but in conjunction with the appropriate button or buttons. If older models have a separate button or switch for each function, then amateur cameras have reduced controls and many important buttons may be missing, which makes the photographer constantly refer to the menu and waste time.
In general, younger Canons have more buttons than Nikons: in particular, there are usually buttons for setting ISO, white balance, shutter modes and autofocus.
For amateur Nikons, the controls are rather sparse: there are only buttons for selecting shutter and flash modes. In addition, there is a programmable Fn button, which can be used to control ISO, white balance, or something else.
Functions that do not have their own buttons are set through the menu, and here it should be remembered that many Canon and Nikon models are equipped with touch screens that somehow compensate for the lack of real buttons and switches, although they do not fully replace them.
Flash
Flash control is more convenient in Nikons, if only because even the cheapest Nikon cameras have a separate button for switching flash modes and setting flash exposure compensation. In Canon, all this has to be done through the menu.
Nikon cameras are much less likely to make mistakes with fill flash power, although they often force the photographer to resort to compensation.
The approach to controlling flash exposure compensation is also different. With Nikon, flash compensation controls the difference between overall exposure and flash exposure, while exposure compensation itself controls exposure in general, changing both external and flash exposure at the same time, while maintaining the difference between them. With Canon, exposure compensation controls only external exposure, and flash compensation only controls flash exposure, without regard to the main exposure compensation.
autofocus
Autofocus works fine, both in Nikons and Canons. I could say that Canon has faster autofocus, while Nikon has more accurate, but maybe I'm wrong - the difference is so insignificant and subjective.
The number of focus sensors varies from model to model and is for Nikon - from 11 to 153 for cropped cameras and from 39 to 153 for full-frame cameras, while for Canon - from 9 to 19 and from 11 to 61, respectively. All this is more than enough.
In cropped models of both brands, the focusing points cover a fairly large part of the frame, while in full-frame models they are pressed close to the center of the viewfinder.
Most Nikon cameras have an autofocus assist lamp that turns on when there is a lack of ambient light. Canon, in a similar situation, raises the built-in flash and fires a series of pulses to help the autofocus find its target. I recommend that you always turn off this absurd feature so as not to annoy others.
All SLR cameras allow back button focusing. Personally, I always separate focus and shutter release, and therefore the shutter button has nothing to do with autofocus for me.
Older models from both Nikon and Canon have a dedicated AF-ON button on the back that you can press with your thumb to activate autofocus. On younger models, there is usually no AF-ON button, but its duties can be assigned to the exposure lock button, which I personally never use for its intended purpose anyway.
I have to admit that on Canon devices, the AF-ON button is somewhat more convenient, and, by the way, the back button focusing function was first implemented by Canon in 1989 in the Canon EOS 630 camera.
Nikon versus human thoughts
We are all used to the fact that almost any scale is read from left to right. If you look at the Canon exposure meter scale (at least in the viewfinder, even on the LCD screen), you will see a completely logical and expected picture: smaller values on the left, large ones on the right. Again, to decrease the exposure, turn the corresponding dial to the left, and to increase it, to the right. But Nikon is the opposite! Minus is on the right, plus is on the left. Accordingly, the disks must be turned in a direction unexpected for an unprepared person. Fortunately, the direction of rotation of the dials, as well as the orientation of the exposure meter scale, can be reversed according to common sense using a special menu item, which I always do.
It is a pity that not all such tricks can be neutralized through the menu. Remember how most threaded and bayonet connections work? That's right, they are tightened clockwise. In other words, to the right - they are twisted, to the left - they are unscrewed. Similarly, when attaching a lens to a Canon camera, you turn it clockwise until it clicks into place. The lens is removed by pressing the button and turning the lens counterclockwise. Simple and clear. But the gimlet rule is not a decree for Nikon, and Nikon lenses should be twisted to the left (looking from the side of the lens), and unscrewed to the right. I understand that sometimes the technique is forced to use a left-handed thread to avoid self-unwinding (for example, the left pedal of a bicycle), but what kind of self-unwinding can we talk about in the case of a bayonet lens mount, which is unlikely to experience any significant rotational loads?
As a consequence of the left mount, rear caps also fit counter-clockwise on Nikon lenses. On cheap lenses, this can even be dangerous, because trying, according to many years of habit, to screw or unscrew the cap in the wrong direction (from Nikon's point of view), you risk breaking the fragile plastic mount.
Thanks to Nikon that at least the thread for the filters and for the tripod has a traditional direction. But why not follow world standards in everything? Being original and different from competitors is good and commendable, but not at the expense of convenience and common sense!
The zoom, focus, and, on older lenses, the aperture ring also rotate in a non-standard direction. However, if we look at these rings from the side of the viewfinder (namely, this is how we usually hold the camera when shooting), then the direction of their rotation makes sense: by rotating the ring to the right, we increase the focal length, focusing distance, or aperture value, and turning to the left - decrease.
 |
 |
| Canon | Nikon |
 |
 |
But hoods on Nikon lenses are put on by the usual clockwise rotation. Lord! If you are doing everything the other way around, then at least be consistent!
In fact, at constant use Nikon cameras get used to all these nuances very quickly and stop noticing them, but they can confuse a beginner, causing him at first acquaintance with the system not so much physical as psychological inconvenience.
User settings
In amateur models, both Nikon and Canon, with the preservation of individual settings, everything is very bad: for each situation, the camera has to be manually reconfigured, wasting precious time. In more serious cameras, very convenient user settings modes appear, allowing you to save individual presets for different scenes and, if necessary, call them up in an instant. For Canon, user modes are denoted by the letter C (Custom), for Nikon - U (User). One can only regret that the number of user presets is small (from one to three, depending on the model), while I would prefer to have at least five of them.
Strangely, the most expensive professional Nikon models use a settings banks system, which, in my opinion, is less convenient than the user modes (U1, U2) of simpler cameras.
Shooting video
Shooting video is more convenient with Canon. I'm not a big fan of DSLR videography, but don't let me kill the videographer in you. Canon's new cameras use a hybrid phase-contrast autofocus system in LiveView and video, which is both faster and more accurate than conventional contrast autofocus. Silent stepper focusing motors of the latest Canon lenses are useful, first of all, when shooting video. Yes, and Canon has plenty of experience in the production of video and movie cameras.
Build quality
Both Nikon and Canon make very high quality products. Much here depends not on the brand, but on the specific model and its purpose. Top professional cameras and lenses are as reliable as a Kalashnikov assault rifle and designed for the harshest operating conditions. They are not afraid of rain, dust, accidental bumps or falls. Cheap amateur models are almost entirely made of plastic and are unlikely to withstand asphalt, but they are made quite soundly and have a margin of safety sufficient for most normal photographic situations.
Remember that digital cameras become obsolete faster than they physically wear out, especially in the hands of an amateur who blows dust off the camera and is afraid of the slightest scratch on the lens to the point of convulsions. Professional photographers are ruthless and pragmatic with their tools, but even they rarely use up their camera. And, of course, the strength of the camera is directly proportional to its weight and cost.
Appearance
Well, the exterior of the camera is definitely a matter of taste, and has little effect on the pictures, although it is important for the emotional mood of the photographer. I would say that Nikon's design has a touch of classics, while Canon's design has a touch of modernism. Nikon's junior cameras tend to look more expensive than they really are, while the amateur Canon's design is more straightforward and utilitarian. Some cameras can be ordered not only in black, but also in red, gray or bronze. I hope you don't.
Canon's best L-series telephoto lenses are painted white (supposedly to keep them from overheating in the sun), and you can see the photographer with the expensive Canon a mile away. Nikon optics are mostly black.
Perhaps someone will find it curious that Giorgetto Giugiaro took part in the design of many Nikon cameras, if this name tells you something.
Price
Both manufacturers occupy the same price niche, otherwise there would not be such fierce competition between them. Jokes that “Canon is Nikon for the poor” were relevant in the 80s of the last century, but today they have no basis. Almost any Nikon model is opposed by a Canon model similar in cost, quality and characteristics. As a rule, you get what you pay for, although there are exceptions. A model that has just been released to the market is always overpriced. It comes to the fact that the newest entry-level device is more expensive than the more advanced model of the previous generation, which objectively surpasses it in all respects. Digital cameras are getting cheaper quickly, especially amateur ones. Since new models are released asynchronously by Canon and Nikon, cameras of the same class may be in different phases of their market life cycle and, therefore, cost differently. Today it is more profitable to buy Canon, tomorrow - Nikon, but, in general, prices for similar models remain approximately at the same level.
From the foregoing, it can be seen that neither Nikon nor Canon have any unconditional advantages over each other, but differ only in small things, although there are quite a few of these small things. Both are good enough that, regardless of your choice, you won't have any reason to regret it.
Thank you for your attention!
Vasily A.
post scriptum
If the article turned out to be useful and informative for you, you can kindly support the project by contributing to its development. If you did not like the article, but you have thoughts on how to make it better, your criticism will be accepted with no less gratitude.
Do not forget that this article is subject to copyright. Reprinting and quoting are permissible provided there is a valid link to the original source, and the text used must not be distorted or modified in any way.
If you or your loved ones already have photographic equipment and optics Nikon, then in order to save on lenses, it would be preferable to get a DSLR from this manufacturer.
Nikon lenses from the 70s and 80s are compatible with many modern cameras so you can use them for many years to come. You get high-quality glass at a relatively inexpensive price.
Whether it's Nikon or Canon, you need to understand that you are choosing a camera with a great range of lenses. If you have friends or family members who shoot with one brand or another, and you will often contact them, then this is already a good enough reason to give preference to any of these brands.
What doesn't matter
At the time of this writing, there are 4 cameras in Nikon's arsenal from which you can choose: D3200, D5200, D90 or D7100. In addition to modern models, consider purchasing older generation equipment to save money. We will talk about this below.
But before we focus on the features of individual models, let's start by listing those things that you should stop paying attention to. This will make your decision making process easier.
Megapixels
If you have not purchased a camera for a long time, then most likely, when choosing, you first of all pay attention to the number of megapixels.
Please stop.
Any new camera these days has enough megapixels. Even more than you need. Even if the low-end camera has 10-12 MP, it will give you enough detail to print poster-sized images without any serious problems. Also, how often do you need this format?
good to have more flexibility, but as soon as you use 24 MP resolution, the file sizes will be huge. You won't often shoot at the highest quality level, simply because it's not practical.
Full frame vs crop
Are you new to photography? Then don't go after a full frame sensor. In other words, for Nikon cameras, you can immediately exclude the D600, D800 and D4 models.
Why?
They're big. They are expensive. And if you are not a professional photographer, this will be too much for you.
Therefore, it is better to save your money on buying new lenses.
To appease your mind, we note that, for example, inexpensive Nikon DSLR The D3200 delivers image quality that, in most shooting situations, will be very close to what you'd get with the most expensive camera, the D4. In most cases, with more expensive models, the user gets more control options and other things that professionals need.
(module Yandex direct (7))
Video
Shooting video is a specification that can make a difference. But for most of you, this shouldn't be a problem.
Have you ever shot a video with a SLR camera? Many beginners haven't done this yet. It is not so easy.
And if you've been shooting, you probably know what it's like when the sound is terrible and the autofocus doesn't work as it should.
If you're looking for a good camera that shoots video, check out the Canon S110 pocket camera. It is easy to use and will provide you with excellent video recording.
Just think about how important video is to you.
If you're savvy and have additional devices you can use with your DSLR to break into more professional video settings, that's great. Otherwise, you should look elsewhere.
Finding the best camera for your needs
We will not go through all the technical specifications of each camera. Let's take a look at the different types of Nikon camera users, and then you can figure out which model suits you best.
The best photo quality at the lowest price?
As we mentioned above, in most cases good lighting image quality with an entry-level DSLR can rival its more expensive counterparts. So if you want good quality at minimal cost, then the Nikon D3200 is fine for you.
If the price is very, very important to you, then you can find an older model - D3100, which is still well-reviewed. In doing so, you are compromising on build quality and lower screen resolution compared to newer models.
We do not recommend the D3000, as we did not find anything impressive in it.
Taken with NIkon D3200 - Krabi, Thailand
Experienced DSLR owner looking to upgrade without breaking the bank?
Let's face it. Price is not an unimportant issue for most of us. Let's say you're ready to move from your D3100 or D5000 that you've been using for a couple of years to something more advanced to elevate your professional level. You already have a few lenses, but you don't want to spend too much money.
Experienced HDR photographer?
If you're a more experienced HDR photographer, then the D7100 is a must.
It contains several key features which make this camera the best for HDR.
First, you can get 5 frames of bracketing. As you become more familiar with HDR, you will find that 3 frames is often not enough to cover the entire range of lighting needed. The D7100 lets you add two more shots with ease.
Plus, this camera shoots at up to 7fps, so if you're trying to bracket on the fly and you don't have a tripod, the results will be much better. But the use of a tripod is still not excluded.
The abundance of options for camera control and settings suits the more experienced photographer and makes it much easier to take pictures.
The D7000 has three exposure bracketing, so in this case it's still better to prefer the D7100.
Taken with Nikon D7100, HDR - Sun River, Oregon
(module Yandex direct (9))
An upgrade from a soap dish to the first mirror?
If you've always shot with a soapbox and decide to switch to a DSLR, this can seem like a bit of a daunting task. But don't worry, it's not quite like that.
The great thing about the D3200, which is aimed at beginners, is that it has a very clear menu. This camera is capable of much of what its more advanced brethren do. And in it, just like in a soap dish, it is easy to navigate through the menu. There's even a button that will explain the camera's various features when you're not sure about them.
If you want a little more control, but keep the menu simple and clear, then you should look to the D5200. It will certainly give you more room to grow than the D3200.
Taken with Nikon D5000 Havana, Cuba
Got a lot of old Nikon lenses?
Perhaps you or your relatives still have old optics, for example, 50mm f/1.2. Almost any lens from 1977 onwards will pass the autofocus test.
So if you have a lot of old lenses, don't sell them. You just need a new camera body.
Canon is the world leader in the photo and video market. Almost a century of history of the company often becomes a decisive factor when choosing a camera. The Canon logo is found on budget compact digital cameras and professional DSLRs. But it is important to consider that the company has taken up the production of "soap dishes" relatively recently, therefore it does not have such advantages over competitors as in the production of SLR cameras. Canon is taking its first steps towards mirrorless technology, but it is still a long way from market leaders.
The company's forte is SLR cameras. Fans of the brand note the intuitive menu and pleasant color reproduction in warm colors. It is said that the world of photographers is divided into "canonists" and "nikonists", but this is due more to force of habit than significant differences. Under any brand, more or less successful models can be hidden. In order not to make a mistake with the choice, read reviews of the best cameras.
Best Canon Compact (Digital) Cameras
Compact cameras are the most inexpensive and mobile representatives of Canon photographic equipment. Smaller and lighter than mirror models, they are great for travel and family photo albums. The weight of most of them ranges from 400 to 600 grams. At the same time, the case of digital devices is devoid of fragile protruding parts, which makes it easy to transport them in a bag or suitcase.
Despite their small size and relatively low cost, these Canon developments are as good as some beginner DSLRs in terms of image quality. After all, the best representatives of the category are equipped with a decent matrix with enough a large number photosensitive points to compare with more expensive devices.
3 Canon PowerShot SX620HS
Bargain. Good combination of light weight and run time
Country:
Average price: 12,989 rubles.
Rating (2018): 4.5
The most successful low-cost model confidently entered the ranks of the best thanks to a practical weight of 182 grams, a thin body of 2.8 centimeters and an excellent image stabilizer. With all this, a compact camera runs on battery longer than its neighbors in the rating and other representatives of the class. On average, the battery lasts for 295 photos. Connoisseurs of shooting in low light will definitely be pleased with Canon's built-in flash, which retracts into the body. Also, the camera is good for fans of experiments with optical effects. The presence of a special thread on the lens allows you to install a variety of attachments and filters.
Thanks to its practicality, this Canon has become one of the brand's most popular budget cameras. In addition to autonomy and clear shots on the go, the reviews note convenience, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth support. The quality of the photo, of course, is inferior to professional models, but for its price it is the best.
2 Canon PowerShot SX540HS
The best shooting speed. User Choice Award. Optical super zoom
Country: Japan (made in China)
Average price: 19 890 rubles
Rating (2018): 4.6
Although compact cameras are traditionally considered not too powerful and not functional enough, a relatively inexpensive model belonging to the middle price segment surprisingly combines these important features and more. With a splendid 50x optical zoom that allows you to shoot from distances that would require binoculars, Canon also pleases with an excellent sensor with a resolution of 21.1 megapixels, which is slightly more than some beginner SLR cameras. In addition, the device stands out from its peers with its burst shooting speed, which reaches almost 6 frames per second. Improved speed also went to the video function, so that the camera shoots video at a speed of 60 frames per second.
All users rate the compact camera with the best scores and leave extremely positive feedback. In their opinion, this is an excellent choice for its price.
1 Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II Kit
The best quality among compact digital cameras
Country: Japan
Average price: 45,490 rubles.
Rating (2018): 4.8
The camera has been on the first lines of the ratings since 2014. This is the choice of quality connoisseurs who are willing to pay for it and are looking for a compact digital camera. The main advantage is high-quality optics. A bright lens (aperture opens up to F2) at close distances will allow you to shoot without a flash in low light.
Among other technical parameters, we note a 5x optical zoom, a macro mode, an impressive crop factor of 1.85 for a compact, Full HD video, Wi-Fi and a swivel touch display.
The PowerShot G1 X Mark II could be called the perfect compact digital camera, but it lacks a viewfinder. Enthusiasts can purchase it separately, but the purchase will increase the cost of the camera by one and a half times.
The best Canon DSLRs for hobbyists
Contrary to the opinion of many beginners, SLR cameras are far from the same. Therefore, for those who are just starting to master photography, it is recommended to give preference to models for beginners. Unlike more sophisticated advanced and professional cameras, they are richer in ready-made modes and filters than in manual settings, which makes it much easier to create unique photos with improved properties. This allows you to gradually learn the possibilities of photographic equipment, without getting confused in options that are not always necessary for a beginner, requiring experience and certain knowledge.
Although easy to use, Canon cameras for beginners offer a lot of possibilities, supporting a number of interfaces and add-ons. The best of them, among other things, are characterized by the maximum resolution available to the camera.
3 Canon EOS 1300D Kit
Price quality. Flash bracketing mode
Country:
Average price: 24,840 rubles.
Rating (2018): 4.6
The bronze of the review was earned by one of the most inexpensive cameras, which, despite its affordability, has received many advantages that make it the best solution for beginners among relatively budget devices. Decent color reproduction combined with a resolution of 5184 by 3456 pixels provides good image quality. Also, this Canon model is equipped with a good set of ISO modes that allow you to experiment with light, and even flash bracketing, which most competitors do not have. This auto mode, which changes flash output with each shot, is used in continuous shooting to create a series of shots, each with a unique light level.
Also, according to numerous reviews, the SLR camera is very convenient to use, endowed with an intuitive menu, holds a charge well and transmits the smallest details. But stabilization was not his forte.
2 Canon EOS 750D
Hybrid autofocus. Maximum flash range. battery pack
Country: Japan (manufactured in Taiwan)
Average price: 46,620 rubles.
Rating (2018): 4.7
One of the most expensive Canon developments for beginners - worthy representative premium class. Equipped with a very rare autofocus system known as hybrid, the SLR combines best features two other systems and supports useful mode live view. It allows the photographer to track the subject in real time, making it easier to choose angles and settings. At the same time, the pictures are quiet and quite clear even in low light conditions. Powerful flash with a flash range of up to 12 meters is convenient for close-ups and medium range. Another advantage of Canon was the ability to connect a battery pack to increase battery life.
The main feature of the camera for beginners, many users call high quality photos. A rich package, including a set of lenses and a program for working with images in RAW format, will also please the buyer.
1 Canon EOS 200D Kit
The best novelty of 2018. Capacious battery and Time-lapse. The thinnest and most compact
Country: Japan (made in China)
Average price: 36,570 rubles.
Rating (2018): 4.8
With a maximum 25.8 megapixels for this category, Canon is ideal for both beginners and amateurs who continue to slowly master photography. Despite the excellent image quality and functionality, the novelty of 2018 can be called inexpensive, in comparison with analogues. Also, the camera is equipped with a capacious battery, designed for autonomous shooting up to 650 photos, which makes it one of the most energy-efficient in the category. Time-lapse mode for shooting at long intervals for creating time-lapse videos. At the same time, the camera is thin, and its weight does not exceed 456 grams. Therefore, it is convenient to take it to outdoor photo shoots.
Among other things, in the reviews, the strengths are often called flash illumination for focusing in poor lighting conditions, mobility, and touch control. Overall performance and excellent build complete the look best model newcomers.
The best Canon DSLRs for advanced users
Models for advanced photographers are a reasonable choice for those for whom the functionality of a camera for beginners is already cramped, but there is still not enough experience and knowledge to work with full-fledged professional equipment. Also, a significant factor in favor of this category can be the price, because semi-professional devices are many times cheaper and often with approximately the same properties. At the same time, Canon DSLRs successfully combine amateur auto modes with manual settings, giving the owner a huge selection of filters, lighting levels and so on.
All this does not prevent advanced Canon cameras from being relatively compact and in some cases not even heavier than digital counterparts. Therefore, for location shooting or a photo report about the trip, they are the best fit.
3 Canon EOS 7D Mark II Body
Best reportage camera
Country: Japan
Average price: 98,890 rubles.
Rating (2018): 4.5
For reportage shooting, the EOS 7D Mark II is the best option, it’s not for nothing that the camera is compared to a machine gun. In the latest version, the rate of fire has been increased to a record 10 frames per second. And this is not just a marketing ploy: frame processing occurs instantly without a limit on the number of shots. At this speed, the shutter resource increased to 200 thousand is relevant.
Autofocus to match reportage model: 65 cross-type focus points. The lever on the body for adjusting the focus will help you not to miss important point in a series of rapidly changing events. The accuracy and speed of autofocus is reflected in the quality of video recording. To record scenes, the necessary connectors and settings are provided. The speed is 50/60 fps at Full HD resolution.
Improved protection against dust and moisture, a reliable metal body of a SLR camera will allow you to shoot in difficult conditions without the risk of damaging your equipment.
2 Canon EOS 70D Kit
Profitable price
Country: Japan
Average price: 69,100 rubles.
Rating (2018): 4.7
A successful DSLR has been in the ratings of the best cameras for several years. In addition to quality characteristics, the model provides dust and moisture protection. High image quality, pleasant color reproduction, working ISO up to 1600. The camera is famous for its shooting speed - 7 frames per second, and the electronics manage to process the material without hanging.
In terms of the number of focus points (19), autofocus is inferior to competitors, but this has almost no effect on convenience. The camera quickly picks up subjects and focuses. Beginner photographers will love the simple menu and touch screen, while professionals will appreciate the ergonomics. Separately, we note the demanded Wi-Fi, which provides communication with mobile devices.
1 Canon EOS 80D Body
The best ratio of price and quality
Country: Japan
Average price: 72,920 rubles.
Rating (2018): 4.8
The new Canon model is rapidly conquering the market. It is separated from professional full-frame equipment by one key difference - a crop factor of 1.6. Compared to the previous version, the SLR camera turned out to be even more perfect. The sensor size has grown from 20.9 to 24.2 megapixels, and 45 focus points (instead of 19) ensure precise focusing, even when objects are located at the edges of the frame. The phase detection autofocus system allows you to comfortably shoot photos and videos. By the way, the frame rate in Full HD in the EOS 80D is increased to 60 frames. The novelty will help out the photographer during reportage work: the shooting speed is 7 frames per second.
Among other innovations, we will add an electronic level, Wi-Fi and NFC modules. it Best offer in the market of advanced SLR cameras in terms of price and quality ratio.
The best Canon DSLRs for professionals
It is impossible to be called a professional photographer without having the appropriate equipment. Therefore, despite the numerous advantages of relatively inexpensive cameras for beginners and advanced users, Canon's SLR models for the pros are the best solution for those who decide to make photography their life's work. After all, this category is characterized the largest number megapixels of the matrix, an abundance of manual adjustments and additional features, extended continuous shooting, the highest quality sound when shooting video and other advantages.
Surprisingly, with such rich functionality, many professional cameras hold a charge longer than representatives of other categories. At the same time, they support most of the known formats.
3 Canon EOS 5DSR Body
The best SLR camera for studio shooting. Matrix 50.6 megapixels
Country: Japan
Average price: 195,990 rubles.
Rating (2018): 4.6
The SLR camera is aimed primarily at studio and advertising photographers and expands the possibilities of commercial shooting. The camera occupies a leading position in the ratings, thanks to an improved matrix with a resolution of 50.6 megapixels.
In addition to high resolution, the Canon EOS 5DSR is famous for its speed, but is inferior to its closest competitors in light sensitivity. But if you take into account the use of pulsed light in the studio, then the disadvantage will seem insignificant.
A feature of a full-frame camera is the ability to shoot with crop factors of 1.3 and 1.6. Another useful option is the horizon level in the viewfinder. Canon EOS 5DSR will be the best for studio photographers, but the options for outdoor work are limited. According to photographers, the model is demanding on optics, the potential of the "carcass" is revealed with new L-series lenses.
2 Canon EOS 6D Body
The best ratio of price and quality
Country: Japan
Average price: 94,990 rubles.
Rating (2018): 4.7
An affordable full-frame DSLR is comparable to premium cameras at half the price. Proven electronics went on sale in 2012, became a breakthrough of its time. In particular, the presence of timely installed Wi-Fi and GPS modules helps to occupy the first places in the ratings.
When using top-end lenses, a SLR camera will allow you to achieve excellent detail. The low noise level and high working ISO allow you to shoot at dusk and in dimly lit rooms. The rate of fire is less than that of competitors - 4.5 frames per second, but this is enough for most creative tasks. The camera decently writes video, buyers have no complaints about the sound and detailing of the picture.
The affordable cost of a "full frame" was reflected in ergonomics. Compared to older models, the button functionality is truncated and does not allow you to quickly adjust the set parameters. But these shortcomings cannot be called significant. If you're short on cash, the Canon EOS 6D is your best bet.
1 Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Body
most popular DSLR
Country: Japan
Average price: 223,090 rubles.
Rating (2018): 4.8
The full-frame EOS 5D Mark IV went on sale in September 2016. It became a continuation of the legendary Canon line. The fourth generation of 5D has become even more perfect. Compared to its predecessor, the model received an increased number of 31.7 megapixels, Wi-Fi modules, GPS, the ability to record video in 4K format and a touch screen.
For other parameters, there are no fundamental differences. In the right hands, Canon can do wonders with top-of-the-line optics. Ringing sharpness, spectacular background blur, shooting in low light conditions. Even picky experts call ISO values up to 3200 working.
Like its predecessor, Mark IV has a metal case with dust and moisture protection. The equipment is not afraid of light blows and the vagaries of the weather, and the metal prevents radio interference, reducing the amount of interference from mobile phones. The DSLR is praised for its lightning-fast focusing speed: autofocus rarely falters even when shooting dynamic scenes.
However, some critics considered the changes made insufficient and say that the Mark IV is losing ground in the ratings. The disadvantages include a small buffer size and a rather weak processor: the electronics do not have time to process video in 4K format. Despite this, sales of the legendary digital camera are growing.
The best Canon mirrorless cameras (with interchangeable lenses)
Mirrorless models are great for those who understand photography well enough to master the nuances of interchangeable lenses. However, professional knowledge is not required to master the majority of cameras in the category. Interchangeable-lens models are few and far between, and most come in the Kit variant, which means that the device comes with at least one carefully chosen lens, and sometimes a whole set.
The lack of a mirror gives cameras of this type some advantages over the mirror type when recording video. However, they are much smaller and lighter. Therefore, this is a good intermediate option between a DSLR and a digital model.
3 Canon EOS M10 Kit
The lowest price. Lightweight and compact
Country: Japan (made in China)
Average price: 22,890 rubles.
Rating (2018): 4.5
The top three cameras with interchangeable lenses are opened by the most affordable and practical development of a Japanese company. Costing several times cheaper than some competitors, this Canon is nevertheless not inferior to many of them in a number of ways. Of course, in terms of the quality of the matrix, this mirrorless model is somewhat simpler than professional ones. SLR cameras. However, the presence of a sensor cleaning function, a swivel touch screen and a resolution of 5184 by 3456 pixels make Canon, given the cost, a rather tempting purchase. Moreover, this camera weighs less than not only DSLRs, but also digital devices. The weight of 301 grams and a modest thickness of only 3.5 centimeters make it possible to comfortably transport a compact device even in a small handbag.
The convenience of the camera in all respects is confirmed by numerous reviews. Users praise it for its quality, miniaturization, functionality, modes and reliability.
2 Canon EOS M100 Kit
The largest maximum series of shots. Image quality. Fast autofocus
Country: Japan (made in China)
Average price: 30,030 rubles.
Rating (2018): 4.6
The stylish novelty of 2018 differs from its competitors not only in its original corrugated body and bright retractable flash, but also in the power of some functions. First of all, the camera will please the owner with the best number of effective light-sensitive elements of the matrix in the category, which reaches a figure of 24.2 megapixels, as well as a resolution of 6000 by 4000 pixels. Therefore, there can be no doubt about the quality of the pictures and the possibility of their enlargement or printing in a large format. The strength of the camera was also continuous shooting. The speed of more than 6 frames per second, as well as the maximum number of shots of 21 for RAW format and 89 for JPEG, which is familiar to everyone, will be useful for sports shooting.
In addition, according to numerous reviews, this Canon model has a sharp and very fast autofocus, good stabilization and photo quality. Also, many note the pleasant ergonomics, intuitive menu, autonomy.
1 Canon EOS M50 Kit
The best fast shooting speed. Microphone input. Flash shoe
Country: Japan (made in China)
Average price: 42,990 rubles.
Rating (2018): 4.7
The leader of the best cameras with interchangeable lenses is becoming a powerful device with additional features, found mainly only in not too cheap professional and semi-professional DSLRs. Unlike competitors, this model It is not deprived of the ability to connect additional flashes. A special device called a shoe allows you to connect and synchronize any external portable flash with the camera, thereby giving a good field of activity for lovers to experiment with light. The presence of a microphone input will significantly improve the sound of video materials. Canon is also good at burst shooting, reaching speeds up to 10 frames per second.
At the same time, in the reviews, buyers note an abundance of settings that are suitable not only for beginners, but also for advanced users. In addition, the camera received an excellent electronic viewfinder and convenient button layout.
There are a number of activities that you can do endlessly: look at fire, at water, click seeds and ... compare Canon and Nikon DSLRs. For all their differences between firms and branded lines of cameras, they have a lot in common (tens of years of competition were not in vain). In our last study, we did a general comparison of firms and their potential in terms of camera production. Today we will focus on specific models released at the beginning of the second decade of the 21st century. So the ice has broken...
Comparison of Canon 600D and Nikon D5100
With a small margin from each other, giant companies released budget-class DSLRs in 2011, which became incredibly popular among beginners and experienced photographers. The price of the devices is approximately the same.
Before proceeding to the comparison, we can give you advice: go to the store right now and just try to figure it out, hold it in your hands a little, “play” both models minimally. It may turn out that on an intuitive level you will like one of them and the problem will disappear by itself.
The fact is that the models are competitors so similar that you simply wonder, and in order to feel this difference between them, you need to sweat a lot. The second question is whether the difference will be an advantage or just a feature of a particular model. So, as we can see, you continue to read the article. So the issue remains relevant.
A question of price and taste
Canon, although not as striking, is cheaper. And last but not least, this is due to the price of components. Nikon optics have always cost more than Canon. The same Canon lens at 50mm 1.8 costs half as much as Nikon's. Some people prefer Nikon optics because it is believed to give a sharper picture (however, is it always so necessary, this clear picture?! No one has canceled artistic photography that requires a smoother picture). The dynamic range and ISO of the Nikon D5100 is also ahead of the Canon 600D.
But the Canon 600D is equipped with a built-in autofocus (“screwdriver”), which only more expensive Nikon models have. The Canon D600 also has an EF-S mount, it is easy to choose the right optics for it.
Performance
One of the determining factors is speed: photographing and saving photos. To be fast, efficient and reliable. The Canon 600D processor works without problems and saves photos in both JPEG and RAW, works in Live View mode, it processes video material quite quickly, at maximum settings, and even when using special effects. There are disadvantages that appear during continuous shooting (Nikon, in turn, they do not appear) - it happens that the device “freezes” a little for a couple of seconds. The consequences of this kind can be prevented by slightly reducing the resolution of the final images. Pro tip: set to 6 megapixels, not 18, as it is by default.
By the way, if we take in terms of megapixels, the Nikon D5100 has the maximum possible number of 16, while the Canon EOS 600D has 18. Apparently, in terms of performance, Nikon also thought of everything better. The device has a built-in processor EXPEED2, it allows you to save pictures immediately. A fraction of a second - and you can continue the photo hunt further. And with serial shooting, apparently, there are no problems.
Some users note some slowdown when shooting video, to which professionals respond: “Buy and install high-speed SD (Ultra) memory cards and you will be happy.
crop factor
For Canon 600D, it goes at 1.5, for Nikon - 1.6. The difference is completely insignificant. Both cameras have a CMOS sensor. Within one tenth, cameras shoot the same way.
ISO
According to the declared official characteristics, the ISO range for both Canon and Nikon is the same. But the test results show that Nikon is better in terms of noise reduction. When shooting at high ISO values (for example - 6400), the Nikon D5100 performs better than the Canon EOS 600D. If you lower the ISO to 3200, the difference is significantly reduced, although Nikon still has a slight advantage. If you shoot not in JPEG, but in RAW, then noise can be removed in Photoshop or Lightroom. Looking at the scale we have given, you can understand at what point the useful signal prevails over the noise level. The more harmonious the signal-to-noise ratio, the clearer the image. +6dB means that the noise level is halved. The discrepancies between the measurement points and ISO values \u200b\u200bare somewhat different, due to the fact that there is a difference between the sensitivity of the matrix declared by the manufacturer and the real one. Now let's move away from these tedious numbers and just summarize: the declared matrix parameters and the real ones for the Canon 600D and Nikon D5100 are the same, but in practice Nikon is a little in the lead. But it only shows up at higher ISOs. As we have already said in another article, it is better not to shoot at extreme indicators at all, but to seek the necessary balance empirically.
Shutter speed range
With this, there are no differences between the models. What Canon has, what Nikon has, it ranges from 1/4000 to 30 seconds.
Shooting video
Both Canon 600D and Nikon D5100 have a maximum resolution of 1920/1080. Both cameras allow you to shoot excellent Full HD video with good sound. Only Full HD videos on Nikon are obtained with a maximum duration of 20 minutes, while Canon has only 12 minutes (since the file cannot “weigh” more than 4000 Mb.
In general, HD resolution with parameters of 1280x720 will be enough for a decent result, and this will significantly expand the timing. At Nikon, to start filming, you need to activate Live View, and then click the “Record” button. The position of the disk with the mode selection does not play a role in this case. Canon 600D before filming is switched to the “video recording” position, after which “Record” is pressed.
Also, both models have the ability to make MPEG-4 videos. Both cameras have autofocus. That the one that the other he is not perfect. If you fill your hand and shoot your eye, then you can completely use manual focus. Also that the Canon 600D, that the Nikon D5100 has the ability to use an external microphone.
Why Canon is still better for video
We continue our comparison of Canon and Nikon DSLRs, extremely popular in 2011, which are still in demand today. And this subsection will turn out to be a little more dramatic than the previous ones, where we, in spite of everything, reconciled the competitors. There is an indisputable fact that for shooting video Canon, in particular - this model is more suitable. In the case of the 600D, there is an option to manually set the exposure (ask any pro and they'll tell you why that's a good thing). The Canon EOS 600D also has a digital zoom.
Do not rush to spit - in the case of “soap dishes”, “zoom” is considered a bonton, in the case of a DSLR, this is an additional arsenal of expressive means. An image obtained from an 18 MpX matrix can be stretched without loss to a two-megapixel crop.
There is another unique option for the Canon 600D. It consists in shooting video material at a speed of about 60 frames per second, however, this can be done when shooting regular HD video. So, here are the obvious advantages of the Canon 600D over its equally stellar competitor: the ability to digital zoom, high-speed shooting and manual exposure control.
Compare Canon 60D and Nikon D5200
To compare these two equally popular models, we did a little research and turned to a popular site where such comparisons are honored. For starters, the most basic. Nikon's autofocus system wins. Now for the rest of the parameters.
Sensor size and more
Canon's sensor size is larger, which speaks in favor of better image quality. But the Nikon D5200 has more focus points (more than four times!), Which means that the device has more flexible focusing capabilities. In addition, it makes it easier to find a more favorable angle for focusing in automatic mode. In terms of ISO, the situation is the same as for the Canon 600D and Nikon D5100: the Nikon D5200 model can raise the sensitivity to a higher level than the Canon 60D. But, as we have already said, you can shoot in RAW format and easily edit yourself in Photoshop or Lightroom.
Another option is fast continuous shooting when working with moving objects. Here Canon is not much, but superior to its competitor. The output quality of the picture (photo and video) is better with Nikon. Canon This model does not have a stereo microphone, which can allow you to record high-quality sound without using an external device. There is also such an indicator as a dynamic indicator. So, it is better with Nikon D5200. What does he even give? And it gives the best detail of objects at the output, even if you shoot in poor light.
Now let's dwell on those points on which Nikon and Canon are equal. Both that and that model have tracking focus (it allows you to focus correctly if the object is moving). The Canon 60D and Nikon D5200 are also equipped with a two-stage shutter, which allows you to focus when you press the shutter button halfway, and take pictures when you press it fully.
Summarizing
Did it become a little clearer after our mini-research? This may well be, and yet it is a dispute without end and edge. Whoever undertakes a comparison of Canon and Nikon SLR cameras, he still comes to the conclusion that this is a matter of taste. In some parameters, this or that model is superior to its counterpart, produced by another company. But she cannot surpass her in everything, as well as in the opposite case.