Man and woman 

There is no reception against "scrap". What are the terrible armor-piercing sub-caliber shells. Types of projectiles and the principle of their action Design of modern sub-caliber and armor-piercing projectiles

And passive (pallet), made according to the caliber of the gun. In the first BPS, the pallet was an integral part of the projectile, but already in 1944, British ammunition designers developed their modern modification - armor-piercing sub-caliber projectile with a separating pallet from the active part after it exits the bore. BPS with a detachable pallet is the main anti-tank projectile in the ammunition of modern tanks. Armor-piercing sub-caliber shells with an integral pallet also continue to be used, but in more as ammunition for automatic small-caliber guns, where the implementation of a pallet separating from the active part is difficult or impossible. There are BPS stabilized in flight by rotation and plumage.

English designations for BPS types

In foreign, and after them in domestic publications on the relevant topic, the following abbreviations are often used English designations BPS types:

  • APCR - A rmour- P iercing C composite R igid (armor-piercing composite hard) - BPS with an integral pallet and more solid active part(core);
  • APCNR - A rmour- P iercing C composite N on- R igid (armor-piercing composite non-rigid) - BPS with an integral collapsible pallet and a harder active part (core) for artillery pieces with a conical bore;
  • APDS - A rmour- P iercing D iscarding S abot (armor-piercing sub-caliber with a detachable pallet);
  • APFSDS, APDS-FS - A rmour- P iercing D iscarding S abot- F in- S tabilized (armor-piercing feathered sub-caliber with a detachable pallet).

Armor-piercing feathered sub-caliber projectiles (BOPS, OBPS)

With the adoption of the T-62 medium tank, the USSR became the first country in the world to massively use armor-piercing feathered armor in tank ammunition. sub-caliber ammunition(BOPS). Due to the extremely high speed and long range direct shot.

Armor-piercing shells for the 115-mm gun U-5TS (2A20) were superior in armor penetration at an angle of 60 degrees. from the normal, the best sub-caliber shells for rifled guns by 30% and had a direct shot range 1.6 times greater than regular ones. However, unitary shots for the GSP U-5TS did not allow to fully realize the potential for rate of fire and reduce the internal reserved volume of a promising tank, in addition, due to increased gas contamination fighting compartment T-62 designers were forced to resort to a mechanism for removing spent cartridges, which somewhat reduced the rate of fire of the tank. Thus, the problem of automating the process of loading a tank gun became urgent, which, along with an increase in the rate of fire, significantly reduced the internal volume, and, consequently, security.

At the beginning of 1961, work began on the creation of 115-mm separate-loading rounds with OBPS, cumulative and high-explosive fragmentation shells for the D-68 (2A21) gun.

Completion of work on the creation of separate loading shots for the D-68 gun, installed in a new medium tank with mechanized loading, was successfully completed, and the newly created ammunition was put into mass production in 1964.

In 1966, the T-64 tank with the D-68 gun and new shots for it was put into service.

However, for a number of reasons, the 115 mm caliber gun of the T-64 tank was considered insufficient to ensure guaranteed destruction of promising foreign tanks. Perhaps the reason was an overestimated assessment of the armor resistance of the new, most powerful English tank of that period, the Chieftain, as well as fears of the imminent entry into service of the promising American-German MBT-70 tank, which was never put into service. For these reasons, an improved version of the T-64 tank was created, which received the designation T-64A and was adopted by the Soviet Army in May 1968. The tank was armed with a 125 mm D-81T (2A26) gun developed in 1962 at the plant number 172 (Perm) in OKB-9 under the leadership of F.F. Petrov.

Subsequently, this gun, which deserved a lot positive feedback for their high technical and performance characteristics underwent numerous upgrades aimed at further growth of its characteristics. Upgraded versions guns D-81T (2A26) such as 2A46M, 2A46M-1, 2A46M-2, 2A46M-4 are the main armament domestic tanks to this day.

The beginning of the 60s and the end of the seventies, the adoption of OBPS stabilized by plumage.

The late 1960s and late 1970s were characterized by evolutionary development foreign tanks, the best of which had a homogeneous armor shield within 200 (Leopard-1A1), 250 (M60) and 300 (Chieftain) millimeters of armor. Their ammunition included BPS for 105 mm L7 guns (and its American counterpart M68) and 120 mm L-11 rifled gun of the Chieftain tank.

At the same time, a number of OBPS for 115 and 125 mm GSP tanks T-62, T-64 and T-64, as well as 100 mm smoothbore anti-tank guns T-12, entered service in the USSR.

Among them were shells of two modifications: solid-shell and having a carbide core.

One-piece OBPS 3BM2 for PTP T-12, 3BM6 for GSP U-5TS of the T-62 tank, as well as one-piece OBPS for 125 mm GSP 3BM17, which was intended primarily for export and crew training.

OBPS with a carbide core included 3BM3 for the GSP U-5TS of the T-62 tank, 125 mm OBPS 3BM15, 3BM22 for the T-64A / T-72 / T-80 tanks.

Second generation (late 70s and 80s)

In 1977, work began to improve the combat effectiveness of tank artillery rounds. The staging of these works was associated with the need to defeat new types of reinforced armor protection developed abroad for a new generation of M1 Abrams and Leopard-2 tanks. The development of new design schemes for OBPS has begun, ensuring the destruction of monolithic combined armor in a wide range of angles of impact with the armor, as well as overcoming remote sensing.

Other tasks included improving the aerodynamic qualities of the projectile in flight in order to reduce drag, as well as increasing its muzzle velocity.

The development of new alloys based on tungsten and depleted uranium with improved physical and mechanical characteristics continued. The results obtained from these research projects made it possible at the end of the 70s to begin the development of new OBPS with an improved master device, which ended with the adoption of the Nadezhda, Vant and Mango OBPS for the 125-mm GSP D-81.

One of the main differences between the new OBPS compared to those developed before 1977 was a new master device with sectors of the "clamp" type using aluminum alloy and polymer materials.

In OBPS, before that, leading devices with steel sectors of the "expanding" type were used.

In 1984, the OBPS 3VBM13 "Vant" was developed with a 3BM32 projectile of increased efficiency, "Vant" became the first domestic monoblock OBPS made of a uranium alloy with high physical and mechanical properties.

OBPS "Mango" was developed specifically to destroy tanks with combined and dynamic protection. The design of the projectile uses a highly effective combined core made of tungsten alloy placed in a steel casing, between which there is a layer of low-melting alloy.

The projectile is able to overcome dynamic protection and reliably hit the complex composite armor of tanks that entered service in the late 70s and until the mid-80s.

plan for the development of BOPS in the period from the late nineties was carried out big job, the backlog of which was BOPS 3BM39 "Anker" and 3BM48 "Lead". These projectiles were significantly superior to such BOPS as the Mango and Vant, the main difference was the new principles of the guidance system in the bore and the core with a significantly increased elongation.

The new projectile guidance system in the bore not only allowed the use of longer cores, but also made it possible to improve their aerodynamic properties.

It was these products that served as the basis for the creation of modern domestic OBPS of a new generation. The results obtained from these works served as a basis for the creation of new, modern projectiles.

After the collapse of the USSR in the early 90s, a sharp degradation of the domestic military-industrial complex began, which had a particularly painful effect on the industry for the production of new types of ammunition. During this period, the issue of modernizing the ammunition load of both domestic and exported tanks arose. The development, as well as small-scale production of domestic BPS, continued, however, mass introduction and large-scale production of new generation BPS samples were not carried out. Positive trends in some aspects of this issue have emerged only recently.

Due to the lack of modern BPS, a number of countries with a large fleet of domestic tanks armed with a 125 mm gun have made their own attempts to develop BPS.

This article will look at the various types of ammunition and their armor penetration. Photographs and illustrations of the traces of armor remaining after being hit by a projectile are given, as well as an analysis of the overall effectiveness of various types of ammunition used to destroy tanks and other armored vehicles.
When studying this issue, it should be noted that armor penetration depends not only on the type of projectile, but also on the combination of many other factors: firing range, muzzle velocity, type of armor, armor slope angle, etc. mm armor plates of various types. The shelling was carried out with 75-mm armor-piercing shells in order to show the difference in the resistance of armor of the same thickness, but of different types.

The iron armor plate had a brittle fracture of the rear surface, with numerous spalls in the area of ​​the hole. The impact speed is chosen in such a way that the projectile is stuck in the plate. Penetration is nearly achieved with a projectile speed of just 390.3 m/s. The projectile itself was not damaged at all, and will certainly work properly, breaking through such armor.

Iron-nickel armor, without hardening according to the Krupp method (that is, in fact - structural steel) - demonstrated plastic failure with a classic "envelope" (cross-shaped tear on the rear surface), without any traces of fragmentation. As you can see, close to the previous test, the projectile impact speed no longer even leads to through penetration (hit No. I). And only an increase in speed to 437 m / s leads to a violation of the integrity of the rear surface of the armor (the projectile did not penetrate the armor, but a through hole was formed). To achieve a result similar to the first test, it is necessary to bring the speed of the projectile to the armor up to 469.2 m/s (it would not be superfluous to recall that the kinetic energy of the projectile grows in proportion to the square of the speed, i.e. almost one and a half times!). At the same time, the projectile was destroyed, its charging chamber was opened - it will no longer be able to work properly.

Krupp armor - the front layer of high hardness contributed to the splitting of shells, while the softer base of the armor deformed, absorbing the energy of the projectile. The first three shells collapsed almost without even leaving marks on the armor plate. Projectile No. IV, which hit the armor at a speed of 624 m / s, also completely collapsed, but this time almost squeezing out the “cork” in its caliber. We can assume that with a further, even a slight increase in the speed of the meeting, a through penetration will occur. But to overcome the Krupp armor, the projectile had to be given more than 2.5 times more kinetic energy!

Armor-piercing projectile

The most massive type of ammunition used against tanks. And as the name implies, it was created specifically for breaking through armor. According to their design, armor-piercing shells were solid blanks (without an explosive charge in the body) or shells with a chamber (inside which an explosive charge was placed). Blanks were easier to manufacture and hit the crew and mechanisms of an enemy tank only at the point of penetration of the armor. Chamber shells were more difficult to manufacture, but when armor was pierced, explosives exploded in the chamber, causing more damage to the crew and mechanisms of an enemy tank, increasing the likelihood of detonation of ammunition or arson of fuel and lubricants.

Also, the shells were sharp-headed and blunt-headed. Equipped with ballistic tips to give the correct angle when meeting with sloped armor and reduce ricochet.

HEAT projectile

Cumulative projectile. The principle of operation of this armor-piercing ammunition is significantly different from the principle of operation kinetic ammunition, which include conventional armor-piercing and sub-caliber shells. A cumulative projectile is a thin-walled steel projectile filled with a powerful explosive - RDX, or a mixture of TNT and RDX. At the front of the projectile, explosives have a goblet-shaped recess lined with metal (usually copper). The projectile has a sensitive head fuse. When a projectile collides with armor, an explosive is detonated. At the same time, the cladding metal is melted and compressed by an explosion into a thin jet (pestle) flying forward with extremely high speed and armor piercing. Armored action is provided by a cumulative jet and splashes of armor metal. The hole of the HEAT projectile is small and has melted edges, which has led to a common misconception that HEAT projectiles “burn through” the armor. The penetration of a HEAT projectile does not depend on the velocity of the projectile and is the same at all distances. Its production is quite simple, the production of the projectile does not require the use a large number scarce metals. The cumulative projectile can be used against infantry and artillery as a high-explosive fragmentation projectile. At the same time, cumulative shells during the war years were characterized by numerous shortcomings. The manufacturing technology of these projectiles was not sufficiently developed, as a result, their penetration was relatively low (approximately corresponded to the caliber of the projectile or slightly higher) and was characterized by instability. The rotation of the projectile at high initial speeds made it difficult to form a cumulative jet, as a result, the cumulative projectiles had a low initial speed, small effective range shooting and high dispersion, which was also facilitated by the non-optimal form of the projectile head from the point of view of aerodynamics (its configuration was determined by the presence of a notch). The big problem was the creation of a complex fuse, which should be sensitive enough to quickly undermine the projectile, but stable enough not to explode in the barrel (the USSR was able to work out such a fuse suitable for use in powerful tank and anti-tank guns, only at the end of 1944). The minimum caliber of a cumulative projectile was 75 mm, and the effectiveness of cumulative projectiles of this caliber was greatly reduced. Mass production of HEAT shells required the deployment of large-scale production of hexogen. The most massive HEAT shells were used by the German army (for the first time in the summer-autumn of 1941), mainly from 75 mm caliber guns and howitzers. Soviet army used cumulative shells, created on the basis of captured German ones, from 1942-43, including them in the ammunition of regimental guns and howitzers that had a low muzzle velocity. The British and American armies used shells of this type, mainly in heavy howitzer ammunition. Thus, in the Second World War (in contrast to the present time, when improved projectiles of this type form the basis of the ammunition load of tank guns), the use of cumulative projectiles was quite limited, mainly they were considered as a means of anti-tank self-defense of guns that had low initial speeds and low armor penetration by traditional projectiles (regimental guns, howitzers). At the same time, other anti-tank weapons were actively used by all participants in the war. cumulative ammunition- grenade launchers (illustration No. 8), air bombs, hand grenades.

Sub-caliber projectile

Sub-caliber projectile. This projectile had a rather complex design, consisting of two main parts - armor-piercing core and pallet. The task of the pallet, made of mild steel, was to disperse the projectile in the bore. When the projectile hit the target, the pallet was crushed, and the heavy and hard sharp-headed core made of tungsten carbide pierced the armor. The projectile did not have an explosive charge, ensuring that the target was hit by core fragments and armor fragments heated to high temperatures. Sub-caliber shells had a significantly lower weight compared to conventional armor-piercing shells, which allowed them to accelerate in the gun barrel to significantly higher speeds. As a result, penetration sub-caliber shells turned out to be significantly higher. The use of sub-caliber shells made it possible to significantly increase the armor penetration of the existing guns, which made it possible to hit more modern, well-armored armored vehicles even with outdated guns. At the same time, sub-caliber shells had a number of disadvantages. Their shape resembled a coil (there were shells of this type and a streamlined shape, but they were much less common), which greatly worsened the ballistics of the projectile, in addition, a light projectile quickly lost speed; as a result, at long distances, the armor penetration of sub-caliber shells fell sharply, turning out to be even lower than that of classic armor-piercing shells. Sub-caliber shells did not work well on sloped armor, because under the action of bending loads the hard but brittle core easily broke. The armored effect of such shells was inferior to armor-piercing caliber shells. Sub-caliber projectiles of small caliber were ineffective against armored vehicles that had protective shields made of thin steel. These shells were expensive and difficult to manufacture, and most importantly, scarce tungsten was used in their manufacture. As a result, the number of sub-caliber shells in the ammunition load of guns during the war years was small, they were allowed to be used only to destroy heavily armored targets at short distances. The German army was the first to use sub-caliber shells in small quantities in 1940 during the fighting in France. In 1941, faced with heavily armored Soviet tanks, the Germans switched to the widespread use of sub-caliber shells, which significantly increased the anti-tank capabilities of their artillery and tanks. However, the shortage of tungsten limited the release of shells of this type; as a result, in 1944, the production of German sub-caliber shells was discontinued, while most of the shells fired during the war years had a small caliber (37-50 mm). Trying to get around the problem of tungsten, the Germans produced Pzgr.40(C) sub-caliber projectiles with a steel core and Pzgr.40(W) surrogate projectiles, which were a sub-caliber projectile without a core. In the USSR, a fairly mass production of sub-caliber shells, created on the basis of captured German ones, began at the beginning of 1943, and most of the shells produced were of 45 mm caliber. The production of these shells is over large calibers was limited by the shortage of tungsten, and they were issued to the troops only when there was a threat of an enemy tank attack, and a report was required for each expended projectile. Also, sub-caliber shells were used to a limited extent by the British and American armies in the second half of the war.

high-explosive projectile

High-explosive fragmentation projectile. It is a thin-walled steel or steel-cast iron projectile filled with an explosive (usually TNT or ammonite), with a head fuse. Unlike armor-piercing shells, high-explosive shells did not have a tracer. Upon hitting the target, the projectile explodes, hitting the target with fragments and a blast wave, either immediately - a fragmentation action, or with some delay (which allows the projectile to go deeper into the ground) - a high-explosive action. The projectile is intended mainly to destroy openly located and covered infantry, artillery, field shelters (trenches, wood-and-earth firing points), unarmored and lightly armored vehicles. Good armored tanks and self-propelled guns are resistant to high-explosive fragmentation shells. However, projectile impact large caliber can cause the destruction of lightly armored vehicles, and damage to heavily armored tanks, consisting in cracking of armor plates (illustration No. 19), jamming of the turret, failure of instruments and mechanisms, injuries and shell shock to the crew.

Literature / useful materials and links:

  • Artillery (State Military Publishing House of the People's Commissariat of Defense of the USSR. Moscow, 1938)
  • Artillery Sergeant's Manual ()
  • Artillery book. Military publishing house of the Ministry of Defense of the USSR. Moscow - 1953 ()
  • Internet materials

IN game world of tanks equipment can be provided different types shells, such as armor-piercing, sub-caliber, cumulative and high-explosive fragmentation. In this article, we will consider the features of the action of each of these shells, the history of their invention and use, the pros and cons of their use in a historical context. The most common and, in most cases, regular shells on the vast majority of vehicles in the game are armor-piercing shells(BB) caliber device or sharp-headed.
According to the Military Encyclopedia of Ivan Sytin, the idea of ​​​​the prototype of the current armor-piercing shells belongs to the officer of the Italian fleet Bettolo, who in 1877 proposed using the so-called " bottom shock tube for armor-piercing shells"(Before that, the shells were either not equipped at all, or the explosion of the powder charge was calculated on heating the head of the projectile when it hit the armor, which, however, was far from always justified). After breaking through the armor, the damaging effect is provided by shell fragments heated to a high temperature, and armor fragments. During the Second World War, shells of this type were easy to manufacture, reliable, had a fairly high penetration, and worked well against homogeneous armor. But there was also a minus - on the inclined armor, the projectile could ricochet. The thicker the armor, the more armor fragments are formed when pierced by such a projectile, and the higher the lethal force.


The animation below illustrates the action of a chamber sharp-headed armor-piercing projectile. It is similar to armor-piercing pointed projectile, however, in the back there is a cavity (chamber) with a bursting charge of TNT, as well as a bottom fuse. After breaking through the armor, the projectile explodes, hitting the crew and equipment of the tank. In general, this projectile retained most of the advantages and disadvantages of the AR projectile, featuring a significantly higher armor effect and slightly lower armor penetration (due to the lower weight and strength of the projectile). During the War, the bottom fuses of the shells were not perfect enough, which sometimes led to a premature explosion of the shell before penetrating the armor, or to the failure of the fuse after penetration, but the crew, in case of penetration, rarely became easier from this.

Sub-caliber projectile(BP) has a rather complex design and consists of two main parts - an armor-piercing core and a pallet. The task of the pallet, made of mild steel, is to accelerate the projectile in the bore. When the projectile hits the target, the pallet is crushed, and the heavy and hard sharp-headed core made of tungsten carbide pierces the armor.
The projectile does not have a bursting charge, ensuring that the target is hit by fragments of the core and armor fragments heated to high temperatures. Sub-caliber projectiles have a significantly lower weight compared to conventional armor-piercing projectiles, which allows them to accelerate in the gun barrel to significantly higher speeds. As a result, the penetration of sub-caliber shells is significantly higher. The use of sub-caliber shells made it possible to significantly increase the armor penetration of the existing guns, which made it possible to hit more modern, well-armored armored vehicles even with outdated guns.
At the same time, sub-caliber shells have a number of disadvantages. Their shape resembled a coil (there were shells of this type and a streamlined shape, but they were much less common), which greatly worsened the ballistics of the projectile, in addition, a light projectile quickly lost speed; as a result, at long distances, the armor penetration of sub-caliber shells dropped dramatically, turning out to be even lower than that of classic armor-piercing shells. During the Second World War, sabots did not work well on sloped armor, because under the influence of bending loads, the hard but brittle core easily broke. The armor-piercing effect of such shells was inferior to armor-piercing caliber shells. Sub-caliber projectiles of small caliber were ineffective against armored vehicles that had protective shields made of thin steel. These shells were expensive and difficult to manufacture, and most importantly, scarce tungsten was used in their manufacture.
As a result, the number of sub-caliber shells in the ammunition load of guns during the war years was small, they were allowed to be used only to destroy heavily armored targets at short distances. The German army was the first to use sub-caliber shells in small quantities in 1940 during the fighting in France. In 1941, faced with heavily armored Soviet tanks, the Germans switched to the widespread use of sub-caliber shells, which significantly increased the anti-tank capabilities of their artillery and tanks. However, the shortage of tungsten limited the release of shells of this type; as a result, in 1944, the production of German sub-caliber shells was discontinued, while most of the shells fired during the war years had a small caliber (37-50 mm).
In an attempt to get around the problem of tungsten shortages, the Germans produced Pzgr.40(C) sub-caliber shells with a hardened steel core and surrogate Pzgr.40(W) shells with an ordinary steel core. In the USSR, a fairly mass production of sub-caliber shells, created on the basis of captured German ones, began at the beginning of 1943, and most of the shells produced were of 45 mm caliber. The production of these shells of larger calibers was limited by the shortage of tungsten, and they were issued to the troops only when there was a threat of an enemy tank attack, and a report was required for each spent shell. Also, sub-caliber shells were used to a limited extent by the British and American armies in the second half of the war.

HEAT projectile(CS).
The principle of operation of this armor-piercing ammunition differs significantly from the principle of operation of kinetic ammunition, which includes conventional armor-piercing and sub-caliber projectiles. A cumulative projectile is a thin-walled steel projectile filled with a powerful explosive - RDX, or a mixture of TNT and RDX. At the front of the projectile, explosives have a goblet-shaped recess lined with metal (usually copper). The projectile has a sensitive head fuse. When a projectile collides with armor, an explosive is detonated. At the same time, the lining metal is melted and compressed by an explosion into a thin jet (pestle), flying forward at an extremely high speed and penetrating armor. Armored action is provided by a cumulative jet and splashes of armor metal. The hole of the HEAT projectile is small and has melted edges, which has led to a common misconception that HEAT projectiles “burn through” the armor.
The penetration of a HEAT projectile does not depend on the velocity of the projectile and is the same at all distances. Its manufacture is quite simple, the production of the projectile does not require the use of a large amount of scarce metals. The cumulative projectile can be used against infantry and artillery as a high-explosive fragmentation projectile. At the same time, cumulative shells during the war years were characterized by numerous shortcomings. The manufacturing technology of these projectiles was not sufficiently developed, as a result, their penetration was relatively low (approximately corresponded to the caliber of the projectile or slightly higher) and was characterized by instability. The rotation of the projectile at high initial speeds made it difficult to form a cumulative jet, as a result, the cumulative projectiles had a low initial velocity, a small effective range and high dispersion, which was also facilitated by the non-optimal form of the projectile head from the point of view of aerodynamics (its configuration was determined by the presence of a notch).
The big problem was the creation of a complex fuse, which should be sensitive enough to quickly undermine the projectile, but stable enough not to explode in the barrel (the USSR was able to work out such a fuse, suitable for use in powerful tank and anti-tank guns, only at the end of 1944 ). The minimum caliber of a cumulative projectile was 75 mm, and the effectiveness of cumulative projectiles of this caliber was greatly reduced. Mass production of HEAT shells required the deployment of large-scale production of hexogen.
The most massive HEAT shells were used by the German army (for the first time in the summer-autumn of 1941), mainly from 75 mm caliber guns and howitzers. The Soviet army used cumulative shells, created on the basis of captured German ones, from 1942-43, including them in the ammunition of regimental guns and howitzers that had a low muzzle velocity. The British and American armies used shells of this type, mainly in heavy howitzer ammunition. Thus, in the Second World War (in contrast to the present time, when improved projectiles of this type form the basis of the ammunition load of tank guns), the use of cumulative projectiles was quite limited, mainly they were considered as a means of anti-tank self-defense of guns that had low initial speeds and low armor penetration by traditional projectiles (regimental guns, howitzers). At the same time, all participants in the war actively used other anti-tank weapons with cumulative ammunition - grenade launchers, aerial bombs, hand grenades.

High-explosive fragmentation projectile(OF).
It was developed in the late 40s of the twentieth century in the UK to destroy enemy armored vehicles. It is a thin-walled steel or steel-cast iron projectile filled with an explosive (usually TNT or ammonite), with a head fuse. Unlike armor-piercing shells, high-explosive shells did not have a tracer. Upon hitting the target, the projectile explodes, hitting the target with fragments and a blast wave, either immediately - a fragmentation action, or with some delay (which allows the projectile to go deeper into the ground) - a high-explosive action. The projectile is intended mainly to destroy openly located and covered infantry, artillery, field shelters (trenches, wood-and-earth firing points), unarmored and lightly armored vehicles. Well-armored tanks and self-propelled guns are resistant to high-explosive fragmentation shells.
The main advantage high-explosive projectile is its versatility. This type projectiles can be used effectively against the vast majority of targets. Also, the advantages include lower cost than armor-piercing and cumulative shells of the same caliber, which reduces the cost of combat operations and firing practice. On a direct hit on vulnerable areas(turret hatches, radiator of the engine compartment, knockout screens of the aft ammunition rack, etc.) HE can disable the tank. Also, the hit of large-caliber shells can cause the destruction of lightly armored vehicles, and damage to heavily armored tanks, consisting in cracking of armor plates, jamming of the turret, failure of instruments and mechanisms, injuries and contusions of the crew.

MOSCOW, July 23 - RIA Novosti, Andrey Kots. If modern tank fired with an armor-piercing "blank" from the Second World War, then, most likely, only a dent will remain at the site of the hit - penetrating through is practically impossible. The "puff" used today composite armor confidently holds such a blow. But it can still be pierced with an "awl". Or "crowbar", as the tankers themselves call armor-piercing feathered sub-caliber shells (BOPS). About how these munitions work - in the material of RIA Novosti.

Awl instead of a sledgehammer

From the name it is clear that the sub-caliber ammunition is a projectile with a caliber noticeably smaller than the caliber of the gun. Structurally, this is a "coil" with a diameter equal to the diameter of the barrel, in the center of which is the same tungsten or uranium "scrap" that hits the enemy's armor. When leaving the bore, the coil, which provided the core with sufficient kinetic energy and accelerated it to the desired speed, is divided into parts under the action of oncoming air flows, and a thin and strong feathered pin flies at the target. In a collision due to the smaller resistivity it penetrates armor much more effectively than a thick monolithic blank.

The armored impact of such a "scrap" is colossal. Due to the relatively small mass - 3.5-4 kilograms - the core of the sub-caliber projectile immediately after the shot accelerates to a significant speed - about 1500 meters per second. When hitting the armor plate, it punches a small hole. The kinetic energy of the projectile is partly used to destroy armor, and partly converted into heat. Red-hot fragments of the core and armor go into the armored space and spread like a fan, hitting the crew and internal mechanisms of the vehicle. This creates multiple fires.

An accurate hit of the BOPS can disable important components and assemblies, destroy or seriously injure crew members, jam the turret, break through fuel tanks, undermine the ammunition rack, destroy the undercarriage. Structurally, modern sabots are very different. Projectile bodies can be both monolithic and composite - a core or several cores in a shell, as well as longitudinally and transversely multilayered, with various types plumage.

Leading devices (those same "coils") have different aerodynamics, they are made of steel, light alloys, and composite materials - for example, carbon composites or aramid composites. Ballistic tips and dampers can be installed in the head parts of the BOPS. In a word, for every taste - for any gun, under certain conditions tank battle and a specific goal. The main advantages of such ammunition are high armor penetration, high flight speed, low sensitivity to dynamic protection, low vulnerability to active protection systems, which simply do not have time to react to a fast and inconspicuous "arrow".

"Mango" and "Lead"

Under the 125-mm smoothbore guns of domestic tanks in Soviet time developed a wide range of feathered "armor-piercing". They were engaged after the appearance of the potential enemy tanks M1 Abrams and Leopard-2. The army, like air, needed shells capable of hitting new types of reinforced armor and overcoming dynamic protection.

One of the most common BOPS in the arsenal of Russian T-72, T-80 and T-90 tanks is the ZBM-44 "Mango" high-power projectile, which was put into service in 1986. Have enough ammo complex structure. A ballistic tip is installed in the head part of the swept body, under which there is an armor-piercing cap. Behind him is an armor-piercing damper, also playing important role in penetration. Immediately after the damper are two tungsten alloy cores held inside by a light-alloy metal jacket. When a projectile collides with an obstacle, the shirt melts and releases cores that "bite" into the armor. In the tail of the projectile there is a stabilizer in the form of a plumage with five blades, at the base of the stabilizer there is a tracer. This "scrap" weighs only about five kilograms, but is capable of penetrating almost half a meter of tank armor at a distance of up to two kilometers.

The newer ZBM-48 "Lead" was put into service in 1991. Standard Russian tank autoloaders are limited by the length of the shells, so Lead is the most massive domestic tank ammunition of this class. The length of the active part of the projectile is 63.5 centimeters. The core is made of a uranium alloy, it has a high elongation, which increases penetration, and also reduces the impact of dynamic protection. After all, what more length projectile, the smaller part of it interacts with passive and active obstacles at a certain point in time. Sub-caliber stabilizers improve the accuracy of the projectile, and a new composite "coil" drive device is also used. BOPS "Lead" is the most powerful serial projectile for 125-mm tank guns, capable of competing with leading Western models. The average armor penetration on a homogeneous steel plate from two kilometers is 650 millimeters.

This is not the only such development of the domestic defense industry - the media reported that especially for newest tank T-14 "Armata" created and tested BOPS "Vacuum-1" with a length of 900 millimeters. Their armor penetration came close to a meter.

It is worth noting that probable adversary also does not stand still. Back in 2016, Orbital ATK launched a full-scale production of an advanced armor-piercing feathered sub-caliber projectile with a fifth-generation M829A4 tracer for the M1 tank. According to the developers, the ammunition penetrates 770 millimeters of armor.

The term "sub-caliber projectile" is most often used in tank troops. Such shells are used along with cumulative and high-explosive fragmentation. But if earlier there was a division into armor-piercing and sub-caliber ammunition, now it makes sense to talk only about armor-piercing sub-caliber projectiles. Let's talk about what a subcaliber is and what are its key features and principle of operation.

basic information

The key difference between sub-caliber shells and conventional armored shells is that the diameter of the core, that is, the main part, is less than the caliber of the gun. At the same time, the second main part - the pallet - is made according to the diameter of the gun. The main purpose of such ammunition is to defeat heavily armored targets. Usually this heavy tanks and fortified buildings.

It is worth noting that the armor-piercing sub-caliber projectile has increased penetration due to the high initial flight speed. Also increased the specific pressure when breaking through the armor. To do this, it is desirable to use materials having the highest possible specific gravity as the core. For these purposes, tungsten and depleted uranium are suitable. Stabilization of the flight of the projectile is implemented by plumage. There is nothing new here, since the principle of the flight of an ordinary arrow is used.

Armor-piercing sub-caliber projectile and its description

As we noted above, such ammunition is ideal for firing at tanks. It is interesting that the subcaliber does not have the usual fuse and explosive. The principle of operation of the projectile is completely based on its kinetic energy. In comparison, it is something like a massive high-velocity bullet.

The subcaliber consists of a coil body. A core is inserted into it, which is often made 3 times smaller than the caliber of the gun. High-strength metal-ceramic alloys are used as the core material. If earlier it was tungsten, today depleted uranium is more popular for a number of reasons. During the shot, the pallet takes over the entire load, thereby ensuring the initial flight speed. Since the weight of such a projectile is less than a conventional armor-piercing one, by reducing the caliber, it was possible to increase the flight speed. These are significant values. So, a feathered sub-caliber projectile flies at a speed of 1,600 m/s, while a classic armor-piercing projectile flies at 800-1,000 m/s.

The action of a sub-caliber projectile

Quite interesting is how such ammunition works. During contact with the armor, it creates a small diameter hole in it due to high kinetic energy. Part of the energy is spent on the destruction of the target's armor, and the projectile fragments fly into the armored space. Moreover, the trajectory is similar to a divergent cone. This leads to the fact that the mechanisms and equipment of the equipment fail, the crew is affected. Most importantly, due to high degree Pyrophoric depleted uranium causes numerous fires, which in most cases leads to the complete failure of the combat unit. We can say that the sub-caliber projectile, the principle of which we have considered, has increased armor penetration at long distances. Evidence of this is Operation Desert Storm, when the US Armed Forces used sub-caliber ammunition and hit armored targets at a distance of 3 km.

Varieties of PB shells

Currently, several effective designs of sub-caliber projectiles have been developed, which are used by the armed forces of various countries. In particular, we are talking about the following:

  • With non-separable tray. The projectile passes all the way to the target as a single whole. Only the core is involved in the penetration. This solution has not received sufficient distribution due to increased aerodynamic drag. As a result, the armor penetration rate and accuracy drop significantly with the distance to the target.
  • With non-detachable tray for conical implements. The essence of this solution is that when passing through the conical shaft, the pallet is crushed. This allows you to reduce aerodynamic drag.
  • Sub-caliber projectile with detachable pallet. The bottom line is that the pallet is torn off by air forces or by centrifugal forces (with a rifled gun). This allows you to significantly reduce air resistance in flight.

About cumulatives

For the first time, such ammunition was used by Nazi Germany in 1941. At that time, the USSR did not expect the use of such shells, since their principle of operation, although known, was not yet in service. Key Feature similar projectiles was that they had high armor penetration due to the presence of instantaneous fuses and a cumulative recess. The problem, which was encountered for the first time, was that the projectile rotated during the flight. This led to the dispersion of the cumulative arrow and, as a result, reduced armor penetration. In order to exclude negative effect, it was proposed to use smoothbore guns.

Some interesting facts

It is worth noting that it was in the USSR that arrow-shaped armor-piercing sub-caliber shells were developed. This was a real breakthrough, as it was possible to increase the length of the core. Almost no armor protected from a direct hit of such ammunition. Only a successful angle of inclination of the armor plate and, consequently, its increased thickness in the reduced state could help out. In the end, BOPS had such an advantage as flat trajectory flight at a distance of up to 4 km and high accuracy.

Conclusion

A cumulative sub-caliber projectile is somewhat similar to a conventional sub-caliber. But in its body it has a fuse and an explosive. When breaking through the armor, such ammunition provides destructive action both equipment and manpower. Currently, the most common shells for cannons with a caliber of 115, 120, 125 mm, as well as artillery pieces of 90, 100 and 105 mm. In general, this is all the information on this topic.